[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 189 (Monday, December 14, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S13156-S13157]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                           HEALTH CARE REFORM

  Mr. DODD. Madam President, I wish to resume the conversation about 
the pending health care proposal.
  We have had a lot of talk, going back for 60 years, I guess, about 
health care. But in the last year, if we tried to calculate the number 
of times there have been meetings and conversations, not including the 
ones that occur here on the floor of the Senate but throughout the 
Capitol, both in the other body as well as here, between Members and 
staffs, it has been voluminous, to put it mildly. We are coming down to 
what appears to be the remaining few hours before we will decide as a 
nation whether to move forward or to leave things as they are with the 
hope that one way or the other things may correct themselves in terms 
of the cost, affordability, and quality of health care. So the next few 
days of debates could largely determine whether, once again, the 
Congress of the United States, Democrats and Republicans, as well as 
the administration and all of the others who have grappled with this 
issue now for many months, will succumb to what has afflicted every 
other Congress and every other administration and every other group of 
people since the 1940s. That is our inability to answer the question of 
whether we can do what almost every other competitor nation of ours 
around the world did decades ago--provide decent, affordable health 
care for our fellow citizens.
  If nothing else, this debate has proven how complex this issue is and 
it has demonstrated the wide variety of viewpoints that exist among 
those not only in this very Chamber but among people across the 
country. Certainly, that was evident during this summer's townhall 
meetings. I held four of them in my State earlier this year. I know 
most of my colleagues either did telemeetings or conducted them in 
their respective States. Because this issue affects one-sixth of our 
economy and 100 percent of our constituents, not only those here today 
but obviously the millions yet to come, our debates have been spirited 
and our disagreements at times emotionally charged, not only here in 
this Chamber but across the country.
  So to my Democratic colleagues who still have concerns over aspects 
of the legislation, as all of us do; to any of my Republican colleagues 
who still desire to put people, as I know they do, ahead of 
partisanship; and to my fellow Americans who worry that politics will 
once again triumph over progress, which it has for six decades, let me 
offer some context for the debate that begins again this afternoon and 
will arrive at a closure in a matter of hours and days. The answer 
ultimately will be whether we move forward and do what I think the 
majority of our fellow citizens want us to do or fall back, once again, 
into the same paralysis that affected Congresses, administrations, and 
generations before us.
  The consensus we have already reached as a Senate is that health care

[[Page S13157]]

reform would represent a significant victory for the American people--I 
think we all agree on that point--and it would be a significant moment 
in our Nation's history.
  I think all of us can agree that insurance companies should not be 
allowed to deny coverage because of a preexisting condition, that these 
same companies shouldn't be able to ration the benefits a family 
receives, and that citizens of the United States should be guaranteed 
that the coverage they pay for will be there for them when they need 
it. I think all of us in this Chamber, regardless of party or ideology, 
agree that reform should make insurance more affordable; that it should 
protect Medicare and keep it solvent so that it will be there for 
future generations; and that it should improve the quality of health 
care for all Americans, focusing on preventing diseases, reducing 
medical errors, and eliminating waste from our system so that our 
health care dollars are used more effectively. I think all of us can 
agree as well, regardless of which side of this debate one is on, that 
reform should empower families to make good decisions about purchasing 
insurance; empower small businesses to create jobs; empower doctors to 
care for their patients instead of filling out paperwork; and empower 
the sick to focus on fighting their illnesses instead of fighting their 
insurance companies. These are the commonsense reforms that will make 
insurance a buyer's market, keep Americans healthier, and save families 
and the government an awful lot of money in the years ahead. I think 
all of us share these views--at least that is what I have heard in the 
last year I have been so intensely involved in this debate and 
formulating the policy that is now before us.
  If we listen to the distinguished minority leader, our good friend 
from Kentucky, we might be surprised to learn that his conference has 
decided to not just oppose our legislation but, unfortunately, to 
obstruct even further progress. After all, he called for a reform bill 
that incentivizes workplace wellness, allows people to purchase 
insurance across State lines, and reduces costs. Our bill does all 
three things. Let me be specific. On page 80, our bill includes a 
bipartisan proposal allowing employers to offer larger incentives for 
workplace wellness programs. On page 219 of our bill, it includes a 
Republican proposal allowing health plans to be sold across State 
lines. On page 1 of the Congressional Budget Office analysis of this 
bill, the Congressional Budget Office concludes that our bill would cut 
the deficit of our Nation by $130 billion over the next 10 years--the 
single largest budget deficit reduction since 1997.
  In a body of 100, as we are, in which both parties claim to agree on 
these principles, we should be able to achieve, one would think, a 
bipartisan consensus on a matter of this magnitude. But, sadly, it 
would seem our colleagues--many of them, again, on the other side of 
this divide--don't seem to care what is in this bill specifically.
  I am reminded again, as others have been, of what is actually 
included in this bill--not that I would expect them or anyone on this 
side of the divide to agree with everything that is here. We don't. 
There is not a single Member of this body who would not write this bill 
differently if he or she could. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever 
about that. But we serve in a collegial body of 100 where we have to 
come to consensus with each other even when we don't agree with every 
single aspect of this bill.
  Yet, when I read the words of the chairman of the Republican National 
Committee--and again speaking on behalf of a party, this is why I find 
this so disheartening. At a time such as this, I expect there to be 
full debate and disagreement over various ideas. But read, if you will, 
the words of the national chairman of a major political party in this 
country. Here is what he is suggesting his party ought to be doing at 
this critical hour:

       I urge everyone to spend every bit of capital and energy 
     you have to stop this health care reform. The Democrats have 
     accused us of trying to delay, stall, slow down, and stop 
     this bill. They are right.

  Let's hear that again:

       The Democrats have accused us of trying to delay, stall, 
     slow down, and stop this bill. They are right.

  It is awfully difficult to hear my colleagues talk about wanting to 
get a bill done, wanting to come together, when the chairman of their 
national party is recommending they do everything in their power to 
stop a bill that, in fact, includes many of the very reforms they 
themselves embrace.
  Make no mistake, if the status quo prevails, one thing I can say with 
absolute certainty--if we do what too many of our friends on the other 
side and clearly what the chairman of the Republican National Committee 
are recommending--I can predict with absolute certainty the outcome, 
and that is that premiums will go up dramatically, health costs will 
continue to wreak havoc on small businesses, our deficit will grow 
exponentially, and Americans will see premiums nearly double in the 
next 4 years. In my state of Connecticut, a family of four is paying 
$12,000 a year right now. It is predicted that those premiums will jump 
to $24,000 within 7 years if we do nothing. That much I can guarantee.
  For those who argue for the so-called status quo or keeping things 
where they are, know that more and more people will lose their health 
insurance. More families will be forced into bankruptcy. Hundreds of 
thousands of Americans are going to die unnecessarily, in my view, in 
the name of that obstruction. I don't think we can let that happen. So 
it has fallen to the majority to do alone the job we are all sent here 
to do collectively--the hard and honest work of legislating, as 
difficult as it is.
  The factors that make this work so hard are not new or unique to this 
debate, and, as history shows, they will not be what is remembered a 
generation from now. The words that have been spoken here in this 
Chamber, the charts, the graphs--all of these things are slowly 
forgotten by history.
  Today, we hold Medicare up as an example of a program worth 
defending. How many speeches have been given in the last 2 or 3 weeks 
about the glories of Medicare? I only wish those Members who are here 
today had been present in 1965. We might have been able to pass that 
bill without the partisan debate that took place in those days.
  Today, no one talks about the 50 years it took to bring Medicare to 
the floor of the Senate. No one talks about what the polls said in 1965 
when it took a lengthy debate involving more than 500 amendments, by 
the way, to achieve consensus on Medicare. I might add, nobody attacks 
it as socialized medicine as they did in 1965.
  It is always easier to envision the legislation we want than it is to 
pass legislation we need. Such is the case here this afternoon. We 
won't end up with a bill that I would have written if it were up to me, 
and it won't be the bill that any one of our colleagues would have 
written either.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
  Mr. DODD. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent for 2 more 
minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. DODD. But it will be a bill that improves the health care of all 
Americans. It will be a bill that makes insurance more affordable, 
improves the quality of care, and helps create jobs in our Nation. It 
will be a bill that saves money and saves lives. And it will be a bill 
that decades from now we will remember not for the differences we had 
in this Chamber but for the differences it made in our Nation and for 
the differences it made for our fellow citizens.
  To get there, we must build on the consensus we have already reached, 
not tear it down with the petty weapons of political gamesmanship. We 
must answer not the call of today's poll or tomorrow's election but the 
call of history that we have been asked to meet, that other 
generations, other Congresses have failed to meet but we are on the 
brink of achieving.
  My hope is that all of us will come together in these closing hours 
and do that which many predicted we could not do: pass legislation that 
we need.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Dakota.

                          ____________________