[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 131 (Wednesday, September 16, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9391-S9392]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              HEALTH CARE

  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, the debate over health care continues 
to be a top concern for most Americans, but it is important to realize 
that this debate is not taking place in a vacuum. It is taking place in 
the context of a nation that is increasingly concerned about the size 
and the scope of government.
  Over the past year, Americans have seen the government take over 
automakers and insurance companies. They have seen government spend 
hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out banks and other financial 
institutions. They have seen government run up unprecedented debt. And 
now they are seeing the government trying to take over health care.
  If the White House wants an explanation for all the unrest it is 
witnessing across the country, all the worry and concerns Americans 
have about their health care plans, this is a crucial piece. Democrats 
in Washington may see all these government

[[Page S9392]]

programs and interventions as separate, individual events. But to most 
Americans who are weathering a recession, it seems as if every time 
they pick up a newspaper or turn on the television, Democrats in 
Washington are pushing another trillion-dollar bill, calling for more 
spending, more taxes, and more debt. That is why people are becoming 
more vocal, and that is why they have been delivering a consistent 
message for weeks: no more government takeovers, no more spending money 
we do not have, no more tax increases, and no more debt. Americans are 
concerned about government running their lives and ruining their 
livelihoods, and they do not get the sense that either the 
administration or Democrats on Capitol Hill are listening.
  Nowhere is this disconnect between the people and the politicians in 
Washington more apparent than in the debate over health care. Americans 
do not think a bigger role for government in health care would improve 
the system. Yet despite this, every single proposal we have seen would 
lead to a vast expansion of the government's role in the health care 
system.
  It is not that the Democrats in Congress do not sense the public's 
unease about a new government plan for health care. I think they do. It 
is the primary reason some of them are backing away from proposals that 
include it. What some Americans do not realize, however, is that even 
without a government plan, the health care plans Democrats are 
proposing would still vastly expand the government's role in our health 
care. That is what I would like to discuss in a little more detail this 
morning.
  Let me list just a few examples of how government's role in health 
care would expand even without a government-run plan.
  Even without a government plan, the proposals we have seen would 
force employers to pay a tax if they cannot afford insurance for their 
employees. Employers have warned that this provision would kill jobs. 
At a time when the Nation's unemployment rate stands at a 25-year high 
of 9.7 percent, we should help businesses create jobs not kill them.
  Even without a government plan, these proposals would require all 
Americans to choose only from health insurance plans with standards set 
by the government and would let government bureaucrats dictate what 
benefits are available to families. On this point, Americans have been 
equally clear. People want more choice and competition in the health 
care market so they can pick a plan that will work for their family, 
not one dictated by politicians in Washington. Yet even without a 
government plan, that is what they would get under the proposals we 
have seen. Anyone who saw any of the townhall meetings last month knows 
this idea is about as popular as chicken pox.

  Even without a government plan, these health care proposals would 
require States to expand their Medicaid Programs, something the Senator 
from Tennessee, who is here on the floor, has spoken about frequently. 
Governors from both political parties have expressed serious concerns 
about the effect this particular proposal would have on their State 
budgets. They think these kinds of decisions should be left up to them, 
the States, not the Federal Government, and, frankly, so do most 
Americans.
  Even without a government plan, these health care proposals would 
impose new taxes on small businesses and on individuals. Under the 
House bill, for example, taxes on some small businesses could rise as 
high as roughly 45 percent, a rate that is approximately 30 percent 
higher than the rate for big corporations. Under the same House bill, 
the average combined Federal and State top tax rate for some 
individuals would be about 52 percent--more than half of their 
paychecks.
  Finally, the President has said his plan will not require any 
Americans to give up the health insurance they have and like. But what 
about the 11 million seniors who are currently enrolled in Medicare 
Advantage? Nearly 90 percent of them say they are satisfied with it. 
This program has given seniors more options and more choices when it 
comes to their health care. Yet under the administration's plan the 
government would make massive cuts to Medicare Advantage, forcing some 
seniors off this plan that so many of them have and like. When it comes 
to Medicare Advantage, Democratic rhetoric just does not square with 
reality.
  Let me sum it up. While getting rid of the government plan would be a 
good start, the Democratic bills we have seen would still grant the 
government far too much control over the health care system.
  Over the past few months, Americans have been saying they have had 
enough of spending, enough of debt, and enough of government expansion. 
How are the Democrats in Washington responding? By trying to rush 
through another trillion-dollar bill Americans do not even want and 
cannot afford.
  The American people do want health care reform--not with more 
government but with less. They do not want a new government-run system; 
they want us to repair the system we have.
  On all of these points, the American people are sending a clear and 
persistent message. It is time we in Congress started to listen.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.

                          ____________________