[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 87 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6486-S6488]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          SUPERFUND IN KANSAS

  Mr. ROBERTS. Madam President, I rise today to discuss an issue that 
is one of these ``believe it or not'' issues of waste and abuse 
concerning billions of tax dollars and stimulus funding. I have some 
good news and then I have some bad news to report.
  First the good news. In the last 24 hours, we have been able to 
reverse a policy that would have used stimulus money to pave the same 
road twice within a matter of months. I said yesterday that did not 
pass the Kansas commonsense test or, for that matter, any State's 
commonsense test, and would be a huge abuse of taxpayer dollars. We 
have reversed this plan, this silly plan, in a bipartisan way.
  I wish to personally thank Vice President Biden, the man charged with 
overseeing all of the stimulus spending, for taking action to correct 
this abuse after I contacted him. I really thank the Vice President 
because the White House moved and the Vice President moved in an 
expeditious fashion, and I, quite frankly, didn't expect they could 
move that fast, but they got the job done.
  The Vice President will be in Kansas today, and I asked him to review 
this rather ridiculous example of wasteful spending occurring in 
Cherokee County, KS, just a short 2-hour drive south on U.S. Highway 96 
from where the Vice President will be. You see, a section of old 
Highway 96 would have been

[[Page S6487]]

resurfaced with stimulus funds. Then portions of an EPA Superfund site 
would have been cleaned up with stimulus funds, and the heavy equipment 
used for the cleanup would have damaged the newly resurfaced highway, 
so they would have to go back in and do the highway again. Once this 
cleanup was complete, additional stimulus funds would have gone to 
repair the road damage caused by the heavy trucks. Taxpayers would have 
paid almost $1 million to fix this road twice.
  Fortunately, in working with the Vice President, we now have media 
reports that the Superfund cleanup will occur prior to any roadwork. 
That is the good news. Again, I credit the Vice President and his staff 
and his team.
  Now for the bad news. While this spending issue has been fixed, there 
is a much larger spending issue affecting dozens of Kansas families in 
Cherokee County, KS, and that is still a major problem. I am going to 
urge the Vice President to again provide leadership. He is the self-
proclaimed new sheriff in town. I am an honorary sheriff of Dodge City, 
KS, my hometown. So from one sheriff to another, I would simply say to 
the Vice President: Sheriff, I will ride shotgun or you can ride 
shotgun. We have the problem only half solved.
  You see, in April, EPA Region 7 issued a press release saying 
Cherokee County would receive up to $25 million from the stimulus. 
According to the press release:

       By starting or speeding up cleanup at Superfund sites, the 
     [stimulus] funding is also increasing the speed with which 
     these sites are returned to productive use. When a Superfund 
     site is redeveloped, it can offer significant economic 
     benefits to local communities, including future job creation.

  Unfortunately, for fewer than 100 residents living in the city of 
Treece, the stimulus funding for this project is literally going down a 
sinking hole. The city of Treece, KS, sits on the Kansas-Oklahoma 
border. This small, rural community was once a world leader in lead and 
zinc mining, mining that lasted for nearly 100 years. As the mining 
companies shut down in the 1970s, the groundwater began to rise and the 
pillars that supported the soil above the mine shafts began to collapse 
and you had a giant sinkhole. Shortly thereafter--in 1983, to be 
exact--the EPA placed over 500 square miles in southeast Kansas, 
northeast Oklahoma, and southwest Missouri on the National Priorities 
List of the Superfund list, including the city of Treece. In total, 
Cherokee County, KS, where Treece is located, has 115 square miles in 
the Superfund Program.
  Last summer, during a listening tour of this part of Kansas, I saw 
firsthand how 100 men and women and children are living in absolute 
blight. They live day by day not knowing when--and I mean when, not 
if--their homes will collapse into the earth below into a giant 
sinkhole. They remain there despite the loss of businesses and 
infrastructure because their homes have no market value and they cannot 
sell them to fund a new home or even rent one.
  As parts of Cherokee County have been on the Superfund list for the 
last 26 years, the EPA has removed and replaced contaminated topsoil. 
According to their stimulus press release, the EPA will continue to 
remove lead-contaminated residential soil at more than 380 acres in 
Baxter Springs and Treece. That probably sounds like an admirable thing 
to do, but as the ground below it caves in, the exposed soil that has 
not been cleaned up will rise, so essentially this is a never-ending 
process. You are cleaning up topsoil on a single home, and after the 
sinkhole sinks, obviously the topsoil is going to be contaminated with 
the contaminated soil underneath the new topsoil. If you get all that, 
I think you got the problem. This is a never-ending process.
  I have worked very long and hard with other members of the Kansas 
delegation to determine how best to address this situation. The only 
satisfactory answer anyone has been able to give me is to relocate the 
town to protect the residents from a complete cave-in. The Federal 
Government needs to buy out the land from the remaining homes and 
business owners and then prohibit any future construction on the 
property affected by the contamination. This is exactly what we did 
with Pitcher, OK, on the other side of the State line, just a few years 
ago. Most estimates indicate we could relocate the entire town with $3 
million in Federal funding and $500,000 in State funding--funding the 
State of Kansas has already set aside. During the previous Congress, I 
introduced legislation to address the Federal portion of this funding.
  Fast forward to today, with an economy experiencing a lot of 
turbulence and a so-called stimulus bill that everyone in this body 
heard was an absolute necessity and not only a job maintainer but a job 
creator. So I asked the EPA to use $3 million of already allocated 
stimulus funding to relocate the community--$3 million. I was told no.
  Instead of solving this problem and relocating the families of Treece 
to a safe facility, the EPA, with the assistance of the stimulus 
package, continues to spend even more money, $25 million--eight times 
the amount needed to relocate the community, the 100 people who live in 
blight and fear that their homes will sink into a sinkhole--to put new 
soil--this is what they are currently going to do--onto contaminated 
soil, which is then going to collapse and recontaminate all the soil. 
This doesn't make sense.
  I have had an ongoing dialog with EPA, and they have told me:

       The wastes are causing great environmental harm to 
     southeast Kansas--

  We, of course, knew that--

     as evidenced by the documented impacts to birds, fish, 
     mussels, macro-invertebrates, and horses. There is also 
     evidence of harm to humans as it is related to elevated blood 
     lead levels.

  The letter went on to say:

       EPA Region 7 believes the situation at the adjacent Region 
     6 Tar Creek Superfund site in Oklahoma materially differs 
     from the Cherokee County Superfund site, and that is what 
     drives different decisions for the Tar Creek Site.

  I am going to refer to a couple of charts here.
  This is a picture of Treece, KS, located right here. You can see all 
of these white objects here. Basically, that is the chat material that 
has come out of many mines over 100 years.
  Here is Treece, KS, and here is Pitcher, OK. Here is a giant chat 
pile in between. I have been there. You see many little ponds and 
winding roads, and I advise you not to go fishing in any of those 
ponds. You might catch a three-eyed fish. At any rate, it is all 
contaminated, all a sinkhole, whether it is from Treece, KS, in Region 
7 with the EPA or whether it is Pitcher, OK, in Region 6 in Dallas. I 
don't know what the difference is. If this is contaminated, and it is, 
and this is contaminated and looks the same, and it is, what the heck 
is the difference?
  Let me show another angle so you can appreciate what I am talking 
about. This is what the people of Treece see every day as the Sun rises 
and sets. This is a giant chat mountain--all of this contaminated soil. 
This side of the chat mountain is Treece, the other side is Oklahoma--
the same situation, same problem, same contaminated soil, same 
sinkhole, and the same thing on the other side, except EPA 7 in Kansas 
City can't get it through their heads that this is identical to the 
same problem over here.
  Instead of spending $25 million to clean up and put topsoil on 
contaminated soil that will sink, why can't we spend $3 million to save 
the community of Treece and relocate these people? Basically, EPA 
Region 7 does not have a factual basis, according to them, ``that would 
allow the use of regular or [stimulus] funds for a residential buy-out 
at the Treece subsite.'' Why? We were going to spend money for a road 
to be built twice. We are spending $25 million to put topsoil on a 
sinkhole. Why can't we put $3 million to relocate this town?
  Here is my question. EPA acknowledged there is evidence of harm to 
humans. They listed a whole series of other animals and wildlife, and 
so on and so forth, that they are worried about. I understand that. But 
why not provide assistance to relocate fewer than 100 people from 
harm's way?
  Furthermore, EPA told me that ``a 10-year timeframe is estimated for 
complete waste remediation.'' Due to the continual mine collapses, I 
wonder if the environmental cleanup will ever be completed.
  I think it is in the best interests of all taxpayers to quit throwing 
money down sinkholes and provide an opportunity for 100 folks who have 
no other

[[Page S6488]]

options to move, as their homes are worth nothing. We do not need to 
spend, again, $25 million on a problem that will not be solved--topsoil 
on top of the sinkhole. We need to take care of these people and spend 
$3 million to let them get on with their lives. While American 
taxpayers are spending untold millions to prevent mortgage collapses, I 
can see no better use for the stimulus plan than to get the residents 
of Treece into safe homes.
  I said once before, I am an honorary sheriff of Dodge City. I have a 
badge. You can go to Dodge City and you can meet the marshal, you can 
see Miss Kitty. You can go down to the Long Branch. We are used to 
taking care of problems ourselves. Kansas has appropriated $500,000 to 
do this. All we are asking for is $3 million, not the $25 million that 
I don't think is going to ever really result in any long-term cleanup.
  You have to be there to realize just how bad this is, the pools of 
water and all. People will tell you: Senator, we are going to take you 
around this way. Don't walk this way.
  So I would just ask Sheriff Joe, who is the self-declared sheriff on 
stimulus money, help me out here. Ride sidesaddle or you can drive the 
stage. Help me get $3 million. You have already stopped the ridiculous 
situation of building the road twice after we had destroyed it with 
stimulus money. That is the good news. But the rest of the story is 
that the citizens of Treece need to be relocated. We can do this for $3 
million.
  This remains an awful way to treat any community. I think it is not a 
wise use of taxpayer money. It does not pass the Kansas commonsense 
smell test.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________