[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 86 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H6522-H6523]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                     THE TYRANNY OF GOOD INTENTIONS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Duncan) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. DUNCAN. Mr. Speaker, 3 or 4 years ago, if I had told people that 
we would be facing this year a budget of $3.6 trillion and facing a 
deficit of $1.870 trillion, people would have thought that I was crazy. 
But that is what we're facing.
  And because of the terrible financial condition of the Federal 
Government, all of our expenditures are related, even though they may 
sound at first like they're unrelated. And so I want to speak tonight 
briefly on two issues of national significance, even though they may 
sound unrelated at first.
  President Reagan used to say frequently in speeches that government 
was not the solution; government was the problem. And certainly, there 
also is an expression called the ``tyranny of good intentions.'' And 
that cannot be seen more clearly in anything than in the Federal 
Student Loan Program.
  When I go to speak at the University of Tennessee or other colleges 
and I tell them that my first year at the University of Tennessee it 
cost $90 a quarter, and then $105 and then $120 and $135 a quarter, 
$405 for the whole year my senior year at the University of Tennessee, 
gasps go through the room.
  But back when I went to college, anybody who needed to could work 
part-time and pay all of their college expenses. Nobody got out of 
college with a debt.
  But around that time, or maybe a little bit before, the Federal 
Student Loan Program kicked in. And the colleges and universities 
across the country have used that as a means or an excuse to raise 
their tuition and fees three or four or five times the rate of 
inflation every year since that program came in.
  If I went into any college campus and told those students that the 
Federal Student Loan Program is one of the worst things that ever 
happened to them, they would stare at me probably in disbelief. And yet 
it really is one of the worst things that ever happened to them, 
because throughout our history, college tuition and fees went up very, 
very slowly, and went up at the rate of inflation or even less until 
that loan program came in. And now, ever since that program came in, 
today, tuition and fees are 3- or 4- or 500-percent higher than they 
would have been if we'd just left the thing totally alone.
  As I said, it's called the ``tyranny of good intentions.'' And the 
only way to correct that now is to punish colleges and universities 
that continually raise their tuition and fees at three or four or five 
times the rate of inflation by saying that we're going to limit or cut 
off the loans at those universities and colleges that continually raise 
their tuition and fees above the rate of inflation.
  The second thing, and it seems a little unrelated except, as I say, 
when you're talking about matters that there are significant Federal 
expenditures on, all these things are somewhat related.
  And I'll give another example from my own life. In the early 
nineties, I went to a reception in Lebanon, Tennessee, and the doctor 
who delivered me came and brought my records. And I asked him how much 
he charged back then, and he said he charged $60 for 9 months of care 
and the delivery, if they could afford it.
  And I told him that he probably didn't get anything for me then 
because my parents didn't hardly have any money at that point.
  But we took what was a very minor problem in the mid-sixties and 
turned into a major problem for everybody. Nobody but Bill Gates and 
Warren Buffett and Sheldon Adelson, the casino man, people of that 
rank, could afford or survive a catastrophic medical expense of some 
sort.
  We took what was a very minor problem for a very few people and 
turned it into a major problem for everybody. Before the Federal 
Government got heavily into medical care, medical care was cheap and 
affordable by almost everyone. I started following politics and 
government very closely in the mid-sixties, and I remember when they 
came in with Medicare, and they said that was going to be the saviour 
of the system. Instead, costs exploded.
  Then I remember in the mid- and late seventies when they started 
talking about Medicaid, and they came in with that, that was going to 
be the saviour of the system. Instead, costs exploded.
  Now we're talking about the government getting even more into medical 
care now, and costs will explode again, and they will explode to a 
level far higher than the predictions of what the costs will be, 
because when they first started Medicare, they said it would cost $9 
billion after 25 years. And now we're at 400 and, I think, $42 billion 
on Medicare.

[[Page H6523]]

  The same thing has happened in regard to Medicaid. And it's really 
sad what we have done to the American people, and especially to the 
poor and the lower-income and the working people of this country in 
these two programs. And if we don't--if we aren't very careful, and if 
we don't put many free market and free enterprise-type measures and 
reforms into these bills, then these costs are going to explode, and 
the poor and the lower-income people and the middle income people are 
going to be hurt even more by programs that are, as I say, the 
``tyranny of good intentions.''

                          ____________________