[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 58 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4470-S4471]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                             GITMO CLOSURE

  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, yesterday, I pointed out that the 
President's war funding request contains up to $80 million to close the 
U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay. The administration says 
Guantanamo will be closed by next January. What they haven't told us is 
what they plan to do with these killers once it closes. Well, Americans 
want some assurances that closing Guantanamo will not make them less 
safe. Frankly, that is a very important and understandable request.
  Guantanamo currently houses some of the most dangerous men alive. 
These are men who are proud of the innocent lives they have taken and 
who want to return to terrorism. One person who is there, and whom we 
don't know what we will do with, is Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the 
mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. We captured him while he was planning 
followup attacks to 9/11, including plots to destroy a West Coast 
skyscraper and to smuggle explosives into New York. If we hadn't 
captured him, he may have succeeded in launching the same type of 
attack on the west coast that he carried out on the east coast. This is 
a man who brags about decapitating the American journalist Daniel 
Pearl, with the following quote: ``. . . with my blessed right hand.'' 
How does transferring Khalid Shaikh Mohammed make the country safer?
  Another person at Guantanamo that the administration doesn't know 
what it will do with in 9 months is Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, who served as 
a key lieutenant for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed during the 9/11 operation. 
How does transferring him make the country safer?
  Then there is Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. He was al-Qaida's operations 
chief in the Arabian Peninsula and the mastermind behind the attack on 
the USS Cole which killed 17 sailors in 2000. How does transferring or 
releasing him make our country safer?
  These are just 3 of the 240 terrorists that the administration 
doesn't know what to do with. The one thing they do know is that they 
claim they are going to close Guantanamo in 9 months, even though they 
can't say yet whether the alternative is as safe and secure. All of 
this, despite the fact that after visiting Guantanamo for the first 
time recently, Attorney General Holder said he was ``impressed by the 
people who are presently running the camp'' and that ``the facilities 
there are good ones.''
  That was certainly my impression when I went there a few years ago.
  The administration needs to tell the American people what it plans to 
do with these men if it closes Guantanamo. Two years ago, the Senate 
voted 94 to 3--94 to 3--against sending these men to the United States. 
Foreign countries have so far been unwilling to take any of them in 
significant numbers--understandably. Even if countries were willing to 
take them, there is an increasing probability that some of these 
murderers would return to the battlefield. The Defense Department 
recently confirmed that 18 former detainees had returned to the 
battlefield and said that at least 40 more are suspected of having done 
so. These are people we have already released who are back on the 
battlefield.
  Earlier this year, the Saudi Government said that nearly a dozen 
Saudis who were released from Gitmo are believed to have returned to 
terrorism.
  The administration has made a priority of closing Guantanamo, but its 
first priority should be to assure the American people that the 
detainees at Gitmo will never again be able to harm Americans.


                          Entitlement Spending

  Mr. President, I wish to say another word in addition to my comments 
yesterday about the President's welcome gesture on wasteful spending. 
The Cabinet has been asked to find $100 million in savings over the 
next few months and this is clearly a step in the right direction, but 
it is just a step. Current levels of Government spending and debt are 
completely and totally out of control and the threat of a fiscal 
catastrophe is very real. The only way to address this out-of-control 
spending is to get at the heart of the problem, which is entitlement 
spending. A lot of people do not realize that nearly 70 percent of the 
money the Federal Government spends every year is mandatory spending on 
very popular programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and 
on the interest we have to pay on the national debt.
  Entitlements are the heart of the problem. As Willie Sutton put it: 
That's where the money is. And if we don't find a way to address this 
spending, we will be in very serious trouble as a nation. Fortunately, 
Senators Gregg and Conrad have a proposal on the table that addresses 
entitlement spending head on, by forcing Democrats and Republicans to 
come together and make the kind of tough choices necessary to steer the 
country out of an otherwise inevitable financial shipwreck. It deserves 
much more attention than it has received, and it deserves a vote here 
in the Senate.
  Cutting $100 million in waste is certainly good, but let's put it in 
context. The amount of money the President asked the Cabinet to save 
yesterday,

[[Page S4471]]

$100 million, is about how much we will spend every single day on 
interest on the stimulus bill we passed a while back. Mr. President, 
$100 million in savings is certainly good. It amounts to about 33 cents 
for every single American. Compare that to entitlement spending where, 
in order to meet all our current and future entitlement promises, we 
would have to extract $495,000 from every American household--$495,000 
from every American household. The way I see it, there is simply no 
question as to where the priority should be.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________