[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 47 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[House]
[Page H3610]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




               DISPELLING THE MYTHS OF HEALTH CARE REFORM

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Murphy) is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, as we begin a potentially 
transformational debate about health care this year, I think it is 
critical that we start making policy based on facts and empirical data, 
rather than anecdotes. Currently, our Nation's conversation about the 
future of health care is a little sloppy when it comes to backing up 
interesting stories with actual data. The result is that dozens of 
myths both about our own health care system and about that of other 
countries with systems of universal care have become so dangerously 
prevalent as to risk becoming accepted truth.
  So, I thought it might be useful for the next few months to try to 
come down to this floor and dispel some of those myths and to put hard 
cold facts back on the table as we begin to move forward with a better 
way of providing health care for this country.

                              {time}  1700

  So let's start with this. Over and over I have heard the health care 
reform skeptics tell stories about people that they know or that they 
have heard of living in Canada or living in England waiting for care, 
who had to wait weeks or months or maybe even years to get to see a 
doctor or to get to have a procedure done.
  Every time I hear these stories I think to myself, ``Well, they are 
right; that one person probably did encounter that type of resistance 
from the system.'' But then I also think to myself that it doesn't 
matter, because in this place we need to make policy not on anecdote, 
we need to make policy based on true, real, aggregated data.
  So I think it is time that we started talking about this idea, often 
promulgated by menacing stories of people waiting in other countries 
for a necessary surgery, that a health care system run or overseen by a 
public entity comes automatically with unreasonably long wait times for 
care. The fact is not only is that idea a myth, but the very idea that 
our own health care system delivers the speediest care in the world 
might be an even bigger myth.
  So here are the facts.
  Mr. Speaker, a Commonwealth Fund study of six industrialized nations 
showed that the U.S. actually ranked fifth out of six in patients 
reporting that they could receive a same day or next-day appointment 
for an immediate medical problem. We were behind New Zealand, Great 
Britain, Germany, and Australia, just in front of Canada. In fact, the 
difference between us and England was astonishing, especially because 
many of the stories that you hear about wait times come from the 
British system.
  In England, 71 percent of patients receive a next-day appointment for 
a nonroutine or emergency care visit. In the United States, that number 
is 47 percent. That means, in other words, that more than half of 
Americans when they believe that they have an immediate need to see a 
doctor have to wait at least 48 hours to get in to see that physician.
  Here's another fact. A study by the Institute for Health Care 
Improvement cited in a recent speech by a medical director of a large 
U.S. insurer showed that, on average, Americans are waiting nearly 70 
days to see a health care provider. That same medical director noted 
that many people who are diagnosed with cancer are waiting over a month 
to get in for their first appointment for care.
  Compare that to Canada, a country with a system of universal health 
care most often cited as having unreasonable wait times. Canada's 
national statistics agency reports that its citizens are now waiting 
about 3 weeks for elective surgery, a week less than many people in the 
United States are waiting for cancer treatment. And today in Canada, 
there are no wait times for emergency surgery.
  Now as Paul Krugman points out, it is true that across the board, 
Canadians do wait longer for nonelective surgeries. For instance, in 
one case, the facts back up the claim that hip replacement and knee 
replacement surgeries happen more quickly in the United States. And, in 
fact, there probably are people from Canada traveling to the United 
States to get those procedures done. But you know who pays and 
schedules those procedures here in the United States? You guessed it, 
the government. As it turns out, in America's government run health 
care system, Medicare, which pays for those hip replacement and knee 
replacement surgeries, wait times aren't really that much of a problem.
  The fact is, there is ample evidence to dispel the myth that 
Americans don't wait for health care, and those in government-run 
systems do. And when we looked at the Canadian, which in some cases 
does have longer wait times, we need to remember this: In Canada, they 
are spending about half as much money on a per capita basis as the 
United States. If they spent 1 percent more of their GDP, they could 
eliminate their wait times.
  The bottom line? Stories about people waiting in lines for health 
care in other countries are just that; they are stories.
  The facts, on the other hand, dispel that myth. We wait for health 
care, too. Mr. Speaker, health care reform is our chance to fix that.

                          ____________________