[Congressional Record Volume 155, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[House]
[Pages H311-H317]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


                              {time}  2045
                 HISTORY OF ISRAEL-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Ellison). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 6, 2009, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Weiner) is 
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
  Mr. WEINER. Mr. Speaker and my colleagues, we are now into our 19th 
day of the war of defense on the part of the Israelis in the territory 
called the Gaza Strip, and there has been enormous amount of coverage 
in this 24-hour news environment that we are in. And yet there has been 
a great many questions that have been raised about the origin of this 
conflict, how it might end, and whether or not it is indeed necessary 
at all.
  And the simple information that--to allow the public to understand 
this is that for the course of years, we have had a circumstance where 
residents in one small corner abutting the Nation of Israel--not part 
of Israel, not occupied by Israel, but the Gaza Strip--has been 
lobbying missiles, rockets, day-by-day, hour-by-hour, into their 
neighbors' territory killing people, injuring people, and terrorizing 
people. And it's gone on for a very long time.
  Despite the notion that sometimes we pay attention to these 
circumstances, only every so often for the residents of small 
communities who have been the recipients of these rockets, this has 
been a terrorizing period of years. In fact, there have been thousands 
of rockets that have gone from the Gaza Strip and fallen in Israel over 
the course of the last several years.
  Now, just so it's completely clear, the Gaza Strip is not occupied 
territory by any definition any more. The Israeli Government 
unilaterally decided after efforts had broken down to negotiate some 
type of a two-state solution, the Israeli Government and Israeli 
citizens said, ``You know what? We don't want to be in Gaza at all any 
more. We're leaving. We don't want to be in West Bank at all any more. 
We're leaving,'' and let the Palestinians in the territories 
essentially with what they wanted.
  It wasn't the perfect outcome. It wasn't the outcome that the 
Israelis really wanted going in, and it was, frankly, probably an 
imperfect solution. But since that time in 2005, the territories have 
been under the control of the Palestinian people.
  Now, the Palestinian people have made some decisions under a 
democracy that was remarkably well set up, and despite all of the 
concerns, the Palestinians have indeed made their choice about what 
they want. And what they did is they chose to have Hamas represent them 
in the Gaza Strip, and they chose to have Fatah represent them in the 
West Bank.
  Well, in some ways, we now have the outcome that was almost 
preordained by that choice. Hamas, you see, is an organization that is 
not dedicated to improving the lives of Palestinians, is not dedicated 
to a two-state solution. They are dedicated to the destruction of 
Israel. And to many degrees, when they were elected as representatives 
of the people via a relatively free election in Gaza, they campaigned 
on a platform of saying, ``You know what we're going to do? We're going 
to be a constant, violent thorn in the side of our neighbors in 
Israel.''
  And to some degree, what they did is exactly what they said they 
would do. Almost as soon as they got into office, they began using Gaza 
to launch weapons into their neighbors' backyard.
  Now, throughout this entire time, you might believe that, well, if 
the Israelis or if any country--heck, let's make it the United States. 
If we had even one rocket fall from Canada, or if we had one rocket 
fall from Mexico, or if the residents of New Jersey had one rocket fall 
from New York--even one--it would be reasonable to expect that the 
recipients of that violence would react. Actually that hasn't happened.
  Now, I shouldn't say there has been no reaction. There has been some 
outcry on the part of the Israeli people. The Israelis have gone to the 
United Nations and asked for help and asked for relief. The Israelis 
have pleaded to the Arab world--and this map shows some of the 
neighbors here. Says, ``See what you can do to help us with this 
problem?''
  And this is not a fabrication. In fact, this is the pile of shrapnel 
of the rockets that had landed, the Katyusha rockets just in one town 
of Sderot. This is not something that's the subject of overblown 
rhetoric. You can actually see these landing and see, unfortunately, 
the havoc that they have brought with them.
  So the question then becomes what does a country do?
  Well, first thing that Israel did was they made their best efforts to 
get Hamas to stop in nonviolent ways. But that didn't bear much fruit. 
Then they tried appealing to the international community to rally 
around Fatah, who is the--who occupies and controls the West Bank. That 
didn't seem to work. And finally, over the course of time, it got worse 
and worse and worse.
  For all of the discussion about whether or not Israel has overreacted 
to the attacks--this is a graphic visualization of attacks by Hamas 
before the war. This number here in 2008, this is before the war began. 
Look at this. Starting in 2005--I guess it was October of 2005--and 
Congressman Berkley, and she knows these facts better than I, October 
of 2005, elections happened, internationally supervised elections, and 
the Palestinians in Gaza choose Hamas to be their representatives.
  For anyone to say after that moment that much is a surprise would be 
wrong. Hamas campaigned on a reign of violence against Israel, and to 
their credit, if that's the word for it, they carried it out.
  You can see from this 946 rockets fell on Israel; 783 rockets fell on 
Israel in 2007. And this is the number--and I want to point this out. 
This has nothing to do with what might have happened recently. This is 
what happened in 2008. Even considering the fact that for a good 
portion of this 2008 there was a cease-fire that Israel agreed to 
engage in and Hamas agreed to engage in, and of course that was broken 
by Hamas when they started dropping rockets again.
  So I guess the question then becomes--and I ask any critics of Israel 
how they would answer this question--What do you do when it's your job 
to protect your citizens? It's the ultimate authority of any government 
is to protect its citizens from violence. What do you do when this type 
of violence takes place?
  But the question goes beyond whether or not Israel is within its 
right to defend itself. I think that's almost beyond dispute. But it 
does go to the responsibility of the other nations in that area.
  Now, many people have asked how could it be that this tiny piece of 
land in Gaza, how could it be that they could even have thousands upon 
thousands of rockets to launch anywhere? Well, the answer lies in its 
neighbor, Egypt.
  Egypt, through this very tiny passageway through the Sinai Desert, 
has permitted tunnels to be dug for thousands upon thousands of rockets 
to be brought in to the Gaza Strip.
  Egypt, the second largest recipient of our tax dollars in foreign 
aid. Only Israel gets more; it's about the same amount. Since the Camp 
David Accords, we, the taxpayers of the United States, have about $3 
billion a year in aid going to Egypt. Egypt is the place that many of 
these weapons are coming from into Gaza. Largely speaking, the area 
along the western border is Egypt's control and Egypt's supervision.

  Then you've got to ask, well, what is Jordan doing? Many people have 
said, ``Well, why is it that the West Bank exists? Why isn't it part of 
Jordan's control? Who are the refugees refugees from?'' Well, you go 
back historically, where they came from is Jordan. And Jordan has said, 
``We don't want them.''
  For all of this talk about the new Arab World and all of the protests 
about who it is that should help out with the Palestinian problem, 
right now the only reason that they're the Israeli's responsibility is 
because Jordan has said, ``We don't want any part of these people.''
  And where is it that Hamas is headquartered? Why is it that we read 
reports today that the citizens of Gaza are saying, ``We're okay. We 
would like to try to figure out a way to resolve this peacefully''? 
Well, the problem is

[[Page H312]]

Hamas leaders are in Damascus. They are nowhere near the action. 
Because Syria, just as they did in the War of the Rockets in 2006, 
provide harbor for the Lebanese attackers--for the Hezbollah attackers 
in Israel, Hamas has its leadership in Damascus; and they're saying, 
``Go ahead. Blow up more Palestinian homes. Blow up more of the 
Palestinian territories.''
  So then you've got Saudi Arabia. Well, Saudi Arabia is even worse 
than perhaps the other ones because what they're doing is pumping out 
more and more and more money for the terrorists at both sides of 
Israel. They want to continue the conflict as long as they can. Why? 
Well, if you were Saudi Arabia and you were the royal family and you 
had denied your citizens rights and you were like a monarchy constantly 
teetering on your point, you'd want any distraction possible. So they 
continued to fund the homicide bombers; they continued to fund the 
terrorists.
  So when you hear the protests from the Arab League, when you hear the 
protests from our feckless friends at the United Nations, the question 
should be, ``Why aren't you helping in some constructive way?''
  Israel has, over the course of time and time and again going back all 
the way to 1947 where Israel agreed to the United Nations' original 
partition plan, said, ``We'll take half this amount of land so long as 
we can live in peace.'' The Arabs said, ``No.''
  The Wye River Accord. The Palestinians said no, the Israelis said 
yes.
  All throughout the history of Israel, it has been Israel saying, ``We 
will do anything necessary to allow us to live in peace.''
  And the very reason that rockets are falling now on their citizens is 
because they said, ``We're going to give the West Bank, give the Gaza 
to the Palestinians. You govern it as you see fit.'' How have they seen 
fit? They've given aid and comfort to an organization that every day is 
making war against Israel.
  Now there's one other thing that's come up--and it is indeed a 
horrible tragedy--that there are innocent victims in this. If you are a 
child going to school, whether it be in Ramallah, whether it be in 
Gaza, whether it be in Sderot, whether it be in Tel Aviv, whether it be 
in Minneapolis, or Brooklyn, if you're a child, you've done nothing 
wrong; you don't deserve to be a victim of anything. You hold no 
political views. You are a victim.
  But in this case the question has to be asked, Who are you a victim 
of? If you are living in Gaza and Hamas is launching weapons from the 
back of a school, if they're launching weapons from someone's apartment 
building, if they're launching weapons from a public park and Israel 
responds, and unfortunately innocents get harmed, who was it that 
injured them?
  And I would argue, ladies and gentlemen, that what you've seen here 
is a systematic effort by those that are launching these rockets to 
take harbor in people's homes, in schools, and in places like that. 
They've essentially created a whole country of human shields.
  So then we return to the question, What is a country to do? What is 
Israel to do in this circumstance? And I think most of us would say, 
who think about the idea of our neighbors launching weapons upon us, 
that you've got to stop them at some point. You've got to say enough is 
enough.
  Now, looking at it historically--and this may sound almost ironic--
the solution to the conflict in the Middle East is remarkably easy. At 
the end of the day, there are some thorny historical issues, but Israel 
has said, ``If it's about land, we will give you the land that you 
desire.'' And at Camp David II that led to the second Intifada, it 
began because Israel said ``yes'' to 98 percent of what the 
Palestinians had asked for at the negotiating table.

                              {time}  2100

  If it's about who controls Jerusalem, if it's about the borders and 
where in Gaza to provide checkpoints, none of these things have the 
Israelis said they're not prepared to discuss, even though some of us 
from afar feel very strongly that the eternal, undivided, historic 
capital is Jerusalem. And I think that an argument can be made that 
only Israel has shown that they really do care about protecting that 
capital. And it does have a historic place in Jewish life that simply 
does not hold in Muslim life.
  But all of that being said, every one of these issues can be 
discussed and compromised on, provided Israel's neighbors say we're 
going to stop trying to blow you up. Even the Government of Israel has 
said even things like the Golan Heights along the border of Syria--and 
Syria, by the way, is our single greatest problem remaining in Iraq. 
These are not friends of the United States. Saudi Arabia is the country 
that funded Osama bin Laden. Syria is the one who has created a refugee 
crisis in Iraq and has allowed fighters to come in and kill our 
citizens. In Lebanon, a country that if it were left to its own devices 
could have a very bright future ahead just as it had a bright past so 
long as it's not occupied by Hezbollah. Egypt, which entered into peace 
with Israel, and despite all of its shortcomings there is a peace 
treaty that exists today. So why is it this doesn't happen? And that 
needs to be the question that American citizens ask as they watch the 
reports, why is it that you have a situation where you have people 
bombing day after day?
  Now, I think that the plight of the Palestinians is a tragedy, but 
they have become international pawns of these Arab states that seek the 
destruction of Israel. If the sentence becomes, ``Hamas agrees Israel 
has a right to exist side by side and in peace with the West Bank and 
with Gaza as neighbors as part of a Palestinian state,'' if that 
becomes the predicate for a discussion, there can be peace by the end 
of this year. There are deals to be done; I know it because Israel has 
offered them. But when you have a situation that the moment you have 
any kind of a democracy, the result of the democracy--which, again, 
began in--the Israelis left the territories here in 2005. This is what 
a democratic country has decided to do with their democratic freedoms. 
If you have this, you leave Israel with no choice except to defend 
herself.
  And let me just make one point because a couple of my colleagues are 
here and I want to yield to them because they've been leaders on this 
issue as well. You know, who do you get to help with this? Who are you 
going to call? Well, theoretically you should call the United Nations. 
The United Nations should be the place that says, you know what? This 
is just unfair, it's just not right. There is no reason that you should 
have a pile of missiles at the end of the day piled up at your town 
hall as it is in Sderot in Israel.
  But let's look at the United Nations. The United Nations has passed 
15 resolutions against Israel this session. They've done 22 of them 
that were just one-sided resolutions. The General Assembly has passed 
15 resolutions. And since 2006, there have been 22 of them. Just 
recently, in fact, they passed a resolution calling for a cease-fire in 
the Gaza conflict. That's fine. That's fine. But it said that Israel 
should stop its attacks to try to knock out the rockets, but it said 
nothing about Hamas stopping its attacks. So essentially it said go 
back to that chart that I just showed you where more and more rockets 
land.
  Now, I have to tell you, it was a bad day for the United Nations, but 
I'll be very frank, it was a bad day for the United States as well, 
because rather than voting no on that resolution, the United States 
abstained. And I'm a Democrat through and through. President Bush has 
largely been a very good President for Israel. He's had some weak 
spots. He provided unseemly amounts of funding for the Saudi Arabians, 
but by and large has stopped these bad resolutions from passing 
unanimously like this one does. So it was a bad day for the United 
States as well.
  But it's important to note that while all of this is going on, the 
United Nations--in my hometown and Congresswoman Maloney's hometown of 
New York--has not used its power to try to implore the Arab states in 
the region to be helpful. Instead, what they've done is resolution 
after resolution condemning Israel for defending itself.
  Now, I welcome a conversation about some other option that Israel 
has. Maybe it's another few more years of this. Maybe Israel should 
wait until this gets to 10,000 or 20,000. There has to be a point on 
this chart where any person would say, okay, that's enough,

[[Page H313]]

you can now respond. Well, I believe after 3,000 rockets landing upon 
its neighbors, that that point has been reached.
  Now, I see a couple of my colleagues here, neither one of them is on 
their feet. Let me yield to someone who has shown remarkable 
understanding not only of world events in the Middle East, but all 
around, someone who has shown true leadership here on a number of 
issues, including this one, the gentlewoman from New York, 
Congresswoman Maloney.
  Mrs. MALONEY. I thank my good friend and colleague from the great 
city and State of New York for yielding to me. And I am pleased to join 
him in this Special Order expressing our support for Israel.
  After 8 years of constant missile fire, Israel had to take action 
against Hamas. Every nation has the right, and I would say the duty, to 
defend its citizens from missile fire.
  For the last 8 years, more than 10,000 rockets have fallen on 
Israel's civilian population centers. This reign of terror has killed 
28 people and injured more than 700 and traumatized tens of thousands. 
Any country that remained quiet in the face of such an onslaught would 
be failing its people and running away from its responsibility to its 
citizens.
  Israel had to act. And when Hamas announced that it was ending the 
so-called lull and began an active campaign against Israel's population 
centers, Israel had no choice. I say ``so-called'' because nearly 400 
missiles fell on Israel during that period. Hamas did not allow Israel 
a single month of peace.
  I am proud that on Friday, January 9, as one of our first actions of 
the 111th Congress, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted 
in favor of a strong resolution that places the blame for the situation 
in Gaza exactly where it belongs, squarely on the shoulders of Hamas. 
Our resolution makes clear that Israel has a right to defend itself and 
that the path to peace in the region lies in the recognition of 
Israel's right to exist, the dismantling of Hamas's terrorist 
infrastructure, and the release of Gilad Shalit. I want to congratulate 
Speaker Pelosi, the author of our resolution, for having the courage to 
put before Congress such a clear statement of support.
  In 2005, Israel withdrew entirely from the Gaza Strip; Israel gave 
the land back to the Palestinian Authority. Instead of using the 
opportunity, Hamas has squandered its resources, preferring to spend 
capital on developing weapons and smuggling tunnels rather than 
investing in the country and its economic future.
  Rocket and mortar attacks on Israel increased by 500 percent after 
Israel withdrew completely from the Gaza Strip. The world sat silent as 
those missiles fell. There was no U.N. resolution condemning Hamas, not 
even after Hamas repeatedly violated the cease-fire. There were no 
international conferences to discuss what to do about the flight of the 
Israeli families. There was no call to defend Israeli children caught 
in the missiles' path. There were no human rights organizations 
worrying about the growing signs of post traumatic stress syndrome 
among the residents of Israel's south. The silence was thundering. In 
the meantime, Hamas smuggled even more powerful weapons into Gaza.

  The number of Israelis who live under threat has grown as the range 
and strength of the missiles has improved. In recent days, Hamas 
missiles have hit a kindergarten in Ashdod and a high school in 
Beersheba. Both were empty at the time, but the loss of life could have 
been devastating.
  Nearly one million Israelis now listen for the sirens signaling a red 
alert. They have 15 seconds--about as much time as it takes me to utter 
this sentence--to reach shelter. Hamas has always targeted civilians, 
preferring to kill women and children instead of trying to take out 
military targets. At the same time, Hamas violates international law by 
using its own civilian population as human shields, knowing that it 
wins the PR war as the body counts rise. By contrast, Israel builds 
shelters and early warning systems to try to protect its citizens.
  Hamas is displaying the irresponsible acts of madmen and cowards, not 
rulers who can hope to lead a nation. The United States will not accept 
a return to a situation in which Israelis are living with daily missile 
fire. I hope the international community will join us in taking a 
strong stand against the actions of Hamas.
  I would like to yield back to my distinguished colleague and thank 
him for coming before us tonight with such a thoughtful presentation.
  Mr. WEINER. Well, I thank the gentlelady for her leadership. It is a 
voice that has been loud and clear in support of Israel over the years. 
And it is one that, who knows, might be loud and clear in the other 
body at some point in the future.
  I would like to yield now to my colleague from Nevada, Shelley 
Berkley, who has, from the moment when we were elected together and 
began service in 1999, has been a spokesperson for justice, not just in 
the Middle East, but again, throughout the world. And there is a notion 
that sometimes you come to Washington and kind of the waters of the 
town wash over you and take off your edge a little bit. You, 
Congresswoman Berkley, have been someone who has kept your edge when it 
came to fighting for what you believed was right, and it is my honor to 
yield to you such time as you might consume.
  Mrs. MALONEY. Would the gentleman just yield 30 seconds to me?
  Mr. WEINER. Certainly.
  Mrs. MALONEY. I would just like to be associated with your comments 
about my good friend, Shelley Berkley, and to note that I have had the 
honor of traveling with her to Israel to study the historic sites and 
meet with the leadership about these many pressing issues. She has held 
many meetings in her home to discuss the issues in depth, not only here 
in Congress, but in her home with concerned citizens. So I congratulate 
her for her continued leadership.
  Mr. WEINER. I couldn't agree more, and I yield to the gentlelady.
  Ms. BERKLEY. Thank you very much, Congressman Weiner. And let me 
return the compliment, Congresswoman Maloney; we appreciate so much 
your strong and vocal support for issues that I consider to be 
fundamental to the survival of democracy throughout the world, so thank 
you very much.
  Mrs. MALONEY. So eloquently stated. Thank you.
  Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Weiner, coming from you that I haven't lost my edge 
is the ultimate compliment for me after 10 years in Washington, so I 
thank you very much for that.
  About three Augusts ago, a little over that, 3\1/2\ years ago, I was 
part of a congressional delegation that was on the border between the 
Gaza and Israel as the Israeli military was removing the last Israeli 
settlers from the Gaza. As you can imagine, Congressman, it was a very 
painful thing to watch, seeing families being torn apart, taken away 
from the lands that they had settled, where nothing had existed before 
they created their settlements, being taken from their neighbors and 
the villages that they created, truly oases in the desert, was hurtful. 
But I understood why the Israelis did it. They unilaterally withdrew 
from the Gaza with the hope that turning that land back to the 
Palestinians would have the desired effect of bringing peace to that 
area.
  Rather than the peace that the Israelis had hoped for, the 
Palestinians, particularly when Hamas took over, became not an area 
where one would build schools and homes and infrastructure and 
demonstrate to the world that the Palestinian people were able to 
create a state of their own, rather than demonstrating to the world 
that they were capable of self-governance, quite the opposite became 
the very harsh reality. And what you saw, instead of schools being 
built and neighborhoods flourishing and businesses being built and 
infrastructure, hospitals, basic services for the Palestinian people, 
what happened instead was that the Gaza became a launch pad for a reign 
of terror upon the Israeli people that lived on the other side of the 
border.

                              {time}  2115

  Rather than reaching out to the Israeli people in an attempt to forge 
a peaceful relationship between the two peoples, the Gaza has become a 
hellhole. It's become a hellhole for the Palestinian people, and it is 
a hellhole for the people of Israel because they

[[Page H314]]

are continually barraged by rockets well within the Israeli border.
  How many rockets are we talking about? You demonstrated it with your 
graph. We're talking 2 rockets, 10 rockets, a misfiring? We're talking 
about 7,000 rockets in the course of a few years. Who can exist, what 
peoples, what Nation would tolerate that type of continuous assault on 
their innocent population? There is not one country on the planet that 
would not respond. And yet with all the panic and the fear and the 
damage, the psychological damage, and the physical injuries and damage 
and the death that these rockets have caused, the Israeli people did 
not, did not, attack back. But at some point any government worth its 
weight in salt must defend its people, and that is exactly what Israel 
has done.
  Let me share a story with you, Mr. Weiner. A few years ago, I was 
talking to one of the Middle East ambassadors. And I said to him, Is 
there no way for you and your government to intervene and tell Hamas, 
ask Hamas, demand Hamas to stop launching Qassam rockets against the 
Israeli people?
  And his response to me incredibly, when he shrugged his shoulders, it 
was, Well, the Qassam rockets are very inaccurate.
  And I responded to the ambassador, They may be inaccurate unless one 
falls on your head, and then it's very accurate. It's deadly accurate.
  But he shrugged and he said, Well, it's no big deal.
  Well, it's a big deal if you're an Israeli and your child was just 
killed in their school by a Qassam rocket being launched by Hamas from 
the Gaza. This simply must stop.
  But I went further, and I once spoke with the Egyptian ambassador. 
And I said to him, Mr. Ambassador, is there no way for you and the 
Egyptian Government to find those tunnels and blow them up so that the 
flow of arms being supplied mostly by Iran will stop, will cease the 
flow so that Hamas will not have a ready supply of rockets to be using 
against the Israeli people?
  And again I got another shrug: We don't know where they are. We can't 
identify them.
  I said, The Israelis gave you a list. They know exactly where the 
tunnels are. You can't blow up those tunnels and prevent the death of 
innocent Israeli children?
  I got no response.
  Where was the outrage of the United Nations? Where was the outrage of 
the people throughout the world that are rioting now in their countries 
when Israeli children were being killed by Hamas' continuing barrage of 
rockets? Not a one that I can remember. Not one that I've seen on TV. 
Not one speech in the United Nations. Not one moment of outrage. It was 
Israeli children that were being killed and a very patient Israeli 
Government trying to use every diplomatic tool at their disposal before 
they had to go in. They did not want to do this. They would not have 
unilaterally left the Gaza to go back in. It is not something the 
Israeli Government wanted to do.
  When Hamas refused to renew the truce in the middle of December at a 
time that we're celebrating religious holidays throughout the world, I 
knew that we were in for an increase in the carnage being rained on 
Israel, and I'm sorry to say I was right. The Israelis, like any other 
sovereign nation, have a right to defend their people and protect the 
people of their country. Israel should not be held to a higher 
standard, although they hold themselves often enough to a far higher 
standard.
  The Israelis have made two requests of Hamas. These are the two 
requests: They want an end to the rocket attacks. I don't think that's 
an unreasonable request. And they want an end to the tunnels, blow up 
those tunnels to prevent the rearming of a terrorist organization that 
has a vice grip on the Palestinian people in the Gaza. Which one of 
those two demands is inappropriate? Which one is unreasonable? I would 
submit to you, Mr. Weiner, neither one.
  And for those that are talking about Israel's disproportionate 
response to 7,000 rockets, to death, to injury, to damage, how about 
holding the Palestinians to any standard, any measurable civilized 
standard, and put pressure on Hamas to stop launching those rockets 
into Israel? And after all of the last 2 weeks, after the pain on both 
sides, after the horror being perpetrated by Hamas on both the Israelis 
and their own people, Hamas is still launching rockets into Israel.
  Well, let me say if they might be listening today, this evening as we 
speak, we can end this thing. We can bring peace. There can be a long-
lasting truce if Hamas stops the rocket attacks and if the tunnels are 
eliminated. And that is what this body, the United Nations, and 
everyone throughout the planet, throughout this world, ought to be 
demanding of Hamas.
  The human tragedy in the Gaza, the suffering of the Palestinian 
people, let us put it squarely where it belongs: not on the State of 
Israel, not on the Israeli people. It rests squarely on the shoulders 
of the Palestinian leadership. If the Palestinian leadership wanted a 
Palestinian State, they would have had one years ago. What Hamas is 
doing is not for the creation of a Palestinian State. It is for the 
destruction of the State of Israel. And it pains me to say this, Mr. 
Weiner, but if Israel ceased to exist tomorrow, the plight of the 
Palestinians would be no better than it is today. The suffering of the 
Palestinians would not magically go away. It is the Palestinian 
leadership, the leadership in Hamas, that has caused so much pain and 
suffering for the Palestinian people.
  It would be my heartfelt hope with the beginning of a new year and 
the beginning of a new administration in this country that we can truly 
bring peace to the Middle East. It's something that I grew up fighting 
for and caring about. But this cannot stop until the Israelis are 
secure in their tiny country and free from a constant barrage of 
rockets and terrorist attacks by a terrorist organization on their 
border.
  And I thank you so much for giving me these few minutes to share my 
thoughts with you. You are truly an amazing leader, not only in 
Congress and representing your own district and State so well, but you 
make me very proud to be associated with you on these issues and so 
many more. And I thank you for all of that.
  Mr. WEINER. I thank you as well, and it's all well put.
  One of the things, Congresswoman Berkley, that people have said is, 
well, maybe if Israel takes a deep breath and they pull back and maybe 
stop the assault against these terrorists, maybe that would be the 
correct approach. Well, you know that from June until I guess it was 
the 19th of December, the Israelis did just that. They observed 
essentially a cease-fire with Hamas. And what happened? Well, they 
noticed something unusual. They knew that weapons like this, Qassams 
and Katyusha rockets, which have a range of about 12 to 13 to 15 miles, 
during the course of that cease-fire, Hamas was getting a new type of 
weapon. They were getting it from Iran, the Grad missile, which is more 
like 20 miles. Now, it's a little hard for us to get into context 
here in a tiny country the size of Israel. You're talking about your 
enemy having a reach of about a quarter to about a third of your whole 
country, maybe even more than that. And it's worth noting that you 
concluded on an appropriate point to talk about what is it that we can 
do to truly be helpful to the Palestinians here?

  No one, I think, can reasonably argue that Gaza's being under control 
of Hamas has been a good thing for the Palestinians. It has gone from a 
community that had about 750 trucks of import and export coming through 
the borders every single day. They were trying to make a go of it under 
difficult circumstances. Now none of that goes on because Hamas, 
instead of trying to build up international commerce, instead of trying 
to make a country of it, they've chosen to import guerrillas from 
places like Iran to help train their military. They chose to devote 
much of their effort to producing things like this, which are just 
articles of death, rather than trying to figure out a way to make an 
economy work. So, frankly, it is not as if Hamas can say, well, we've 
achieved a better quality of life for our citizens, that we've fought 
with a sword against Israel but at least we have been trying to build 
up a government.
  You know the tragedy is that the Palestinians have had a choice 
between corrupt and violent. That's really the only two choices they 
have had. They have got a government in the West Bank, the government 
in the West Bank here that's controlled by Fatah,

[[Page H315]]

which suddenly seems great except for the fact that they're completely 
corrupt and incompetent; and then you have a government of Hamas, which 
is governed by terrorists.
  But as we think about what the solutions might be, and I think 
ultimately it will have to be that the Israelis have to stop. When 
they're going to have to stop, though, is when they've gotten every 
rocket, when they've blown up every tunnel to Egypt, and ultimately 
they can go back to their side of the border and hope and pray that the 
Palestinian people come to their senses and say we don't want this 
anymore. We saw that start to happen in Iraq after a while. They said, 
why are we making our country just the battleground for terrorists? But 
they're going to need help. We're helping a great deal. As you know, 
much to my chagrin, hundreds of millions of dollars of international 
aid has come into the territories hoping that maybe if we put enough 
money on the barrel head, then the Palestinian people would live in 
peace with their neighbors. Unfortunately, it hasn't worked. They need 
help from other places.
  Well, we need help from Egypt starting immediately to say we're not 
going to allow these tunnels to exist anymore. Now, I don't believe we 
should sit back and hope for help. I believe we should leverage our 
substantial foreign aid to say, look, you're an ally of the United 
States in the broad sense. We provide you billions of dollars in aid. 
We're going to suspend that for a little while until you show that you 
get these under control.
  I will gladly yield.
  Ms. BERKLEY. As you know, we have attempted on numerous occasions to 
take the military aid, the $2 billion in military aid that we give the 
Egyptians every year, and take some of that away so that it would be 
humanitarian aid for the Egyptian people because I can't help but 
wonder what are the Egyptians doing with $2 billion worth of arms every 
single year?
  Mr. WEINER. I agree. And looking at it another way, Mubarak, his 
thorn in his side is the Muslim Brotherhood. They're kissing cousins 
with Hamas. It's in Egypt's interest as well.
  Ms. BERKLEY. It's in Egypt's best interest. Absolutely right.
  Mr. WEINER. Now, obviously we know what we can do with Saudi Arabia. 
We treat Saudi Arabia as if they're an ally. We provide them with 
foreign aid as well. Even more, we are about to send them the most 
sophisticated weapons around. Now, I don't know who it is they think 
they are defending themselves from. Maybe it's the giant army of Jordan 
perhaps. But that's a mistake we're making. And our own State 
Department has confirmed over and over again money going to the 
terrorists. They're a virtual Jerry Lewis telethon, sometimes 
literally, for funding of terrorists. So we in the United States should 
say to Saudi Arabia, you know, when the Crown Prince comes to Crawford, 
Texas, and takes our President by the hand and then does nothing to 
help with this matter, I said President Bush has been a good President 
for Israel.

                              {time}  2130

  He has had a blind spot when it comes to the Saudis. Syria, look, 
let's face the facts here. Syria has become a matrix of problems, 
second only to Iran, which is just off of the corner of this map. You 
know, if you consider how troublesome they have been in Iraq, how 
troublesome they have been in Lebanon, how troublesome they have been, 
if it weren't for Israel taking back the Golan Heights they would still 
be lobbing missiles in from there as well.
  Well, so the question has to be what does Syria want for itself? I 
remember when the younger Assad, when Bashir Assad came in, everybody 
said he would be much better.
  Ms. BERKLEY. Western educated.
  Mr. WEINER. He went to the Sorbonne; he is a pediatrician or 
ophthalmologist.
  Ms. BERKLEY. Ophthalmologist.
  Mr. WEINER. Whatever it is, his mother must be very proud.
  But as it turned out, they have essentially outsourced to any 
terrorist function that wants to go. Secretary of State designee 
Clinton, President-elect Obama, you know, if you want to look for your 
trouble spots, Saudi Arabia and Syria are turning out to be your next 
big problem spots, but Jordan bears a responsibility as well.
  But Jordan has been as close as there is to a moderate in that part 
of the world. They have been it. But if you look at the West Bank, and 
you look at the allegations about refugees, this used to be Jordan. If 
Jordan really cared about solving this problem, they will be doing some 
things that are more constructive.
  But I have got to tell you if they were all as good as Jordan, I 
think we would probably take it. The problem is that we are surrounded 
by people who seem to think that it is in their interest to keep the 
violence going on in the territories, and I think that that has to 
change.
  I am not sure if my colleague from New Jersey is here for this 
Special Order, because he has been a remarkable leader on the issues. 
This is truly a bipartisan issue.
  We recently had a resolution on the floor condemning Gaza and 
standing up in support of Israel. As it always is, we disagree on many 
things in this body, but I think that we have all agreed, and I have 
said previously, I think some Presidents of my party, like Jimmy 
Carter, have been a disaster for Israel. I think some Republican 
Presidents, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, have been very good.
  This is not a partisan issue. This is an issue of right and wrong.
  Ms. BERKLEY. I want to thank the Congressman again for allowing me to 
participate.
  Mr. WEINER. I thank the gentlelady.
  I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey.
  Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey. I thank the gentleman for leading this 
Special Order hour on this topic. And I was just being enlightened, 
honestly, by the comments and your wealth of knowledge on the issues.
  So I appreciate the chance just to spend a couple of minutes with you 
and a chance to talk about this topic. Today is Wednesday. Just this 
past Sunday I was back in my district, which is in the great State of 
New Jersey, and there I was honored to take part in a solidarity 
evening, a rally, if you will, for Israel, held in the Fifth District 
in the State of New Jersey. I would like to just spend a minute or two 
to share with you what was discussed and why I was there.
  Our allies in Israel, obviously, are going through a tremendous 
crisis at this period of time. That's why I was so encouraged that we 
had well over 1,000 people in the room, maybe even more. Besides the 
room we were in, I was told, there was another assembly area where it 
was on TV as well. All of these people across the region came together 
in solidarity for both the victims' families over there, as well as for 
the victims who have lost their lives in this recent conflict.
  The loss of life in this region is truly profound. As you know, when 
we have been on this floor on this issue, we are both tremendous 
advocates for the State of Israel, one of our key allies, our only 
allies in the region over there.
  As you say, it was last year that we were on the floor as well, on a 
particular resolution, I was sponsor of it, you were cosponsor of it as 
well, and there was a resolution at the time when the mortar attacks 
were picking up on the people in Sderot. There was a time that we 
passed that resolution overwhelmingly saying that the United States 
stood on the side of Israel and stood on the side of people of Sderot 
and the right to defend themselves.
  Unfortunately, the sentiments of that resolution were obviously 
ignored by Hamas. Instead, the number of rockets, instead of 
decreasing, increased it dramatically, the number of mortar attacks 
launched now from Gaza in the month of December. In the period of time 
just prior to that, Hamas, I think you were going into this a little 
earlier ago, their capacity to attack and bring violence on Israel has 
increased dramatically with the range, I saw the pictures you had up 
there before, of the mortars and rockets increasing from 20 kilometers 
to over 50 kilometers, I believe it is. Basically, if you add all the 
numbers up on the map there, it means that over 1 million Israelis and 
their lives, their families, their children, are now at risk of mortar 
attack.
  Even worse than that, Hamas' actions, I think, exhibit total 
disregard for innocent human life. Israeli civilians continue to be 
targets of those defensive actions. In addition, it's really

[[Page H316]]

a shameful use of Palestinians' innocent life as well because they are 
being used as human shields and it creates unnecessary victims of 
terror.
  This is a flagrant disregard of international human rights. It's a 
flagrant disregard for the rights of the innocent people, Gaza and 
Israeli residents as well.
  If Hamas really did care about the citizens they purport to 
represent, they should really cease all military activity, all military 
activities against Israel right now and look to international forces to 
achieve peace.
  So I have been pleased to be here in Congress and that Congress has 
not ignored the Israelis' plight, as you indicated just about 2 minutes 
ago, that we have had this resolution, they have worked on jointly on 
this to step up to the plate, and that is H.R. 34.
  Just to conclude, I commended President-elect Obama recently for 
expressing similar concerns that you and I are expressing right now, 
specifically for the people of Sderot. He did that just over a short 
period of time about a year ago when he visited Sderot last year.
  I think you and I join now in urging him to continue that effort to 
speak out, encourage him to demonstrate that unwavering support that 
you and I have for the people of Israel as a struggle against Hamas.
  I think if he takes a stand now on the Gaza issue as he did a year 
ago, as soon as possible, to eliminate any ambiguity concerning the 
resolve that the United States has to aid Israel, the President-elect 
really has an opportunity to strengthen our Nation's diplomatic hand 
and call for an end to the destruction of innocent lives. I urge him, 
as I am sure you do as well, to take that step immediately.

  But as I close here I try to remain the optimist. Despite all of the 
current challenges, I still believe that there is a potential for 
further progress.
  Israel has shown a willingness to pursue peace. Now if only the 
Palestinian Authority and the Arab governments make equal steps 
forward, we can achieve that lasting peace.
  Finally, now, Israel left Gaza a short time ago in the hopes of 
peace. Israel returned to Gaza to fight terrorism and hopefully they 
will now achieve that peace.
  I, again, commend the gentleman.
  Mr. WEINER. Well, I thank the gentleman. Very well put. I appreciate 
your leadership on this. I should point out whenever I come to the 
floor, whether it be to make sense of our foreign policy as it relates 
to Saudi Arabia, you have been always been there trying to problem 
solve, trying to figure out the way we can use a lever.
  Before I yield to my friend from Iowa, you know, very often when we 
look at these stories on television, my neighbors say, well, why is it 
our problem? Why is it a United States problem? Why do we really care? 
It's far away.
  If you think about what's going on here, and I haven't pointed this 
out yet today, and, frankly, we all take it as an article of faith, we 
don't even think about it very much, there is really only one democracy 
on this map here. There is one democracy really fighting totalitarian 
regimes and terrorist exports, really, on behalf of all of us.
  I ask you to imagine this scenario. Imagine if this wasn't Hamas, but 
it was al Qaeda. If we knew this little piece of land here was 
controlled by al Qaeda we would say, of course, you have got to be in a 
well--well, Hamas is an adjunct of the same type of influence.
  Frankly, Israel is the only country, not only in this part of the 
world, but you can make a pretty good argument anywhere that is truly 
every day dealing with the ravages of terrorism.
  We were struck on that fateful day when my city was struck on 
September 11, 2001. But if you think about it, if every single day, if 
Iowa or New Jersey or if New York were getting hit with rockets, do you 
think, really, anyone would say, oh, that was a close call, let's go 
back to work now, or anyone would say, oh, it was just a child that was 
harmed or, oh, it was just a school that was hit, big deal, let's just 
go back to work. It would never happen.
  My colleague, the gentleman from Iowa, understands these issues very 
well. Once again, this is a bipartisan effort, and I would be glad to 
yield to him.
  Mr. KING of Iowa. I thank the gentleman from New York for organizing 
this Special Order. Even though I have 60 minutes subsequent to this, I 
appreciate the yield because I would like to say a few words into the 
Record as part of this Special Order.
  This support of Israel goes back deep with me. The 1967 war was the 
year I graduated from high school. I came of age as Israel defended its 
freedom that they had achieved in 1948. My life has almost transcended, 
I am going to go through the sequential order--I was born in 1949, 
Israel was born in 1948.
  As I have watched this, as I have watched the courageous defense 
against enemies that surrounded Israel for all of these years, and I 
have watched the policies a little bit within Israel itself, it occurs 
to me that I have trouble finding a historical example where land was 
traded successfully for peace. I honor the effort that they have made, 
and I certainly honor and support and will continue to support Israel's 
effort to defend themselves.
  As you have illustrated, rockets firing in from a few miles away, New 
Jersey into New York, for example, we would not tolerate that. We 
wouldn't tolerate the second rocket. We wouldn't tolerate the first 
one. This is thousands of rockets.
  So without belaboring the point, I support and endorse the statements 
that were made in this hour, and I support the resolution, obviously. I 
will continue to do so and will stand in solidarity across the aisle to 
stand for freedom. I would submit also that the only place I can see on 
that map where an Arab can go to get a fair trial would be Israel.
  Mr. WEINER. I thank the gentleman very much for his continued 
leadership.
  Let me conclude with just a couple of brief thoughts. You know, some 
of us have turned on the television in recent days and seen that there 
has been a change in tactics on the part of the Israelis. They are no 
longer going over with planes or sending rockets themselves to try to 
hit these targets. But they have actually gone in with troops and are 
going almost literally home by home trying to find the last of these 
rockets.
  Well, when people say the Israelis should use restraint, I ask you, 
how many militaries would do that, because that is the ultimate sign of 
restraint.
  They are sending in their troops to do as surgical a job as possible 
to try to exact from the population whatever rockets are still there. 
They are in people's basements, they are in the back of schools, they 
are in supermarkets, and Israel more so than I think any nation maybe 
in the history of the planet, has always essentially taken one, two, 
three, 10 body blows before they react.
  They do something that I don't think that anyone would expect the 
United States would do, and I don't think they do anything that any 
country has ever done. Every single time that they are attacked, they 
wait, they calibrate. They very often consult with the United States 
and they try to figure out how do we prevent this from escalating.
  Whenever there is an opportunity to negotiate, it is the Israelis 
that say yes. And it is the Palestinians, with the support of these 
neighbors in the region, that say no.
  It has to end. It has to end. If you really want to end this cycle, 
there are some things that we can do. Believe me, I understand there 
are things that the Israelis have to do. And, to their credit, they 
have said time and time again they are prepared to do it.
  One final historical note, you know, the defense minister, Ehud 
Barak, has been quarterbacking this defensive effort. By the way, for 
anyone who follows this, he was very, very reluctant to strike back 
militarily.
  Ehud Barak was, in a past lifetime, he was the prime minister. He was 
the prime minister, the very same defense minister now who is leading 
this military effort was the prime minister who essentially said yes to 
everything that Yasser Arafat asked for at the time, the amount of land 
and the crossings and the control.
  He said yes. He said yes. And what happened? Once he said yes, the 
intifada began. Ehud said the thank you was not okay. We accept the 
deal as done. It was violence began again.
  So there is no one there that probably wants this to come to a 
peaceful ending more than the Israelis. They are

[[Page H317]]

tired, they are exhausted. They recognize that they can't be a 
sustainable country with this kind of circle, this kind of ring, this 
kind of enemy surrounding them. So the idea that somehow the Israelis 
are trigger happy and looking for a fight could not be any more wrong.
  So there are some things for all of us to do. One of the things to 
do, as we look at this through the lens, the western lens of why can't 
we just solve this problem, well, you know what? These are difficult 
problems, but they are solvable. They are solvable when the weapons are 
put down, when the rockets are put down. They are solvable when a child 
in Sderot doesn't have to have a blue room where they run to where they 
have 15 seconds, as Congresswoman Maloney said, to get to safety.
  We can't have a city like the one that has been referred to a few 
times here. Let me put this up one final time.

                              {time}  2145

  Sderot is this little town here, right by Gaza, that has had hundreds 
of missiles fall upon them day after day. We can't expect anyone to 
live like that.
  What we can do as United States citizens is say, listen; one, we are 
going to start talking with our wallets. We are not going to allow any 
aid to go to Gaza until they change their government there. We can't 
support a military terrorist organization.
  We have to say that we want better accountability here too. We want 
better accountability from Fattah.
  We have to demand that Egypt, in exchange for getting billions of 
dollars in aid from us, the very least they can do is make sure the 
tunnels are stopped so if and when there is a cease-fire, and, God 
willing, it is soon, weapons don't come.
  And we have to finally face the reality about places like Saudi 
Arabia and Syria. They are not our allies. Nothing could be further 
from the truth. Although we all know it about Syria, we need to 
recognize it about Saudi Arabia.
  Finally, let me just say this. One of the ways we say God bless 
America is joining with the Israelis when they say Am Yisrael Chai--the 
people of Israel live.

                          ____________________