[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 143 (Wednesday, September 10, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8277-S8279]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mr. FEINGOLD:
  S. 3461. A bill to evaluate certain certification programs, and for 
other purposes; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
Pensions.
  Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, today I introduce a simple bill that is 
the first step toward helping American workers and businesses. The 
Skills Standards Certification Evaluation Act of 2008 will require the 
Secretaries of Labor and Commerce to evaluate skills standards 
certification programs that have been developed with Federal funding.
  Skills Standards Certifications have emerged in the past 2 decades in 
response to job growth in high-technology and varied industries. The 
training or classes usually take weeks or months, rather than years. 
Often, they are developed in response to the needs of one industry or 
even one company, though the skills may be applicable more widely.
  The Federal government has taken conflicting approaches to skills 
standards certifications over the past two decades. That is why, as 
part of the Skills Standards Certification Evaluation Act, I require a 
recommendation from the Secretaries of Labor and Commerce on how 
Congress ought to move forward with funding for these certification 
programs. Both the national, top-down, and a local, bottom-up approach 
have been tried, and a thorough evaluation will make clear how we can 
move forward to get the most out of the funding the Federal Government 
provides.
  These certifications have a tremendous benefit for workers. First, 
because the training is often condensed into a few weeks with a 
flexible schedule, it allows people to complete certifications without 
leaving a current job and without the financial cost of attending a 
full-time program that lasts a year or more. In addition, these 
programs allow workers to clearly demonstrate a certain set of skills, 
and may open more doors for higher-paying employment. Because these 
programs can be completed without leaving work, they also allow workers 
to advance within a career or company to

[[Page S8278]]

more skilled positions and better wages and benefits.
  For employers, Skills Standards Certifications can simplify the 
search for employees. I have heard from numerous Wisconsin employers, 
especially small businesses with limited resources, that it is hard to 
find employees with the skills they need, or who will be dedicated and 
loyal. Skills Standards Certifications clearly show the qualification 
of an individual, of course, but also tell the employer that he or she 
is dedicated enough to invest in the course to earn the certificate. 
Very few people will spend the time and money to enroll in such a 
program if they don't intend to use the certificate.
  Lastly, these programs can help State and local governments quantify 
their skilled workforce, which can be invaluable when marketing the 
area to businesses and investment.
  This bill is a small first step in what I hope can be a continuing 
effort to help hard working Americans obtain and use high-demand work 
skills.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. Hatch):
  S. 3464. A bill to amend the Trade Act of 1974 to improve the 
international protection and enforcement of intellectual property 
rights, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I rise today to express my support for 
International Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement Act of 
2008 S. 3464, introduced by my friend from Montana, Senate Finance 
Committee Chairman Max Baucus and myself. This piece of legislation 
represents months of hard work and collaboration, and I am pleased that 
we have finally arrived at a consensus on this very important global 
issue.
  The protection of intellectual property has always been one of my top 
legislative priorities in the Senate. Now more than ever, America's 
ingenuity continues to fuel our economy, and it is imperative that we 
protect new ideas and investments in innovation and creativity. Make no 
mistake about it: piracy and counterfeiting are the new face of 
economic crime around the world, far exceeding traditional property 
crimes.
  It is estimated that U.S. intellectual property alone is worth $5 to 
$5.5 trillion, that is equivalent to about 45 percent of our GDP. In 
other words, this is greater than the entire GDP of any other nation in 
the world. Additionally, millions and millions of jobs are created 
every year by U.S. IP industries. And, I might add, these jobs earn an 
average of 40 percent more than the average pay of other U.S. jobs. 
Without doubt, America's Intellectual property drives our economy and 
is the envy of the world and we must do everything to protect our prime 
status as a world leader on this front.
  Counterfeiting and piracy aren't just about downloaded music, pirated 
software, or fake designer hand bags. It's about the health and safety 
of the American people. Indeed, counterfeiting and piracy affect all 
sectors of our economy, including pharmaceuticals, auto parts, and the 
quality and safety of our food.
  S. 3464 will serve as an important bridge in the battle to protect 
U.S. intellectual property rights overseas. With the rising tide of 
piracy and counterfeiting abroad, it is vital that we provide those 
working on the front lines with the tools they need to ensure that our 
nation's IP rights are lawfully respected by foreign countries.
  To that end, S. 3464 will require the U.S. Trade Representative, 
USTR, to press countries that violate U.S. intellectual property rights 
to take specific steps to stop violations by developing an action plan 
for each foreign country that has remained on USTR's ``Priority Watch 
List'' of intellectual property deficient countries for at least one 
year. The action plan must list the legislative, enforcement, or other 
actions that the foreign country must take in order to achieve adequate 
and effective protection of intellectual property rights.
  The legislation also provides funds to increase USTR's ability to 
partner with developing countries to improve IP protection and 
enforcement, including capacity building, activities designed to 
increase awareness of intellectual property rights, and training for 
officials responsible for enforcing the laws. Additionally, the bill 
give the President enforcement tools to deal with countries that refuse 
to fight widespread theft of our Nation's IP.
  I am committed to moving this legislation forward and hope that we 
will do so in an expeditious manner.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. FEINGOLD:
  S. 3466. A bill to improve the job access and reverse commute 
program, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
and Urban Affairs.
  Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, today I introduce another piece of my E4 
initiative, so named because it is a collection of proposals that 
address issues important to the economy, education, employment and 
energy. The piece of legislation I am introducing now focuses on the 
important supporting role that transportation can play in economic 
development by creating an environment where employers and those 
seeking employment or better employment are connected together. Having 
such a system to overcome transportation hurdles can benefit both 
employers and employees, as well as the local economy.
  In more general terms, investing in our infrastructure like roads, 
bridges and transit systems can have direct job creation impacts. This 
is one reason I have fought hard with the rest of the delegation for a 
fair rate of return for Wisconsin from the highway bill. I was glad the 
most recent 2005 bill continued a recent streak of getting at least a 
1:1 rate of return after decades of being a donor state and not getting 
a fair share.
  In addition to supporting transportation-related jobs, linking 
workers and businesses that need them can also be an important part of 
a more comprehensive job creation strategy. This can mean supporting a 
robust public transportation system or more specific programs designed 
to link low-income individuals with jobs. I have consistently done the 
former by supporting public transportation during consideration of the 
highway bill and Amtrak reauthorizations. But my specific proposal 
today focuses on the latter and improving the Job Access and Reverse 
Commute, JARC, program that links low-income workers with employers.
  I have heard good things about the JARC program and was glad that it 
was shifted away from earmarks and was made available as a combination 
formula and competitively awarded program in the last highway bill. The 
primary program goal is to locally assess the transportation needs of 
low-income workers and then plan and fund programs to help alleviate 
transportation-related barriers to employment or better employment. 
While the traditional vision for these projects may have begun as 
reverse commute projects whereby transit routes were established to 
allow city center residents to access jobs in the suburbs, the program 
actually does much more than just this and provides reliable 
transportation to low-income urban, rural and suburban workers.
  In Wisconsin, the Federal JARC program is jointly administered by the 
State departments of transportation and workforce development as the 
Wisconsin Employment Transportation Assistance Program, WETAP. 
According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, transportation 
barriers can include a lack of a dependable vehicle or bus service in 
the area, an absence of local jobs, or child care transportation 
problems.
  The State agencies in Wisconsin have found several different types of 
projects to be effective, depending on the local circumstances. These 
projects have included the traditional public transit projects such as 
extending bus lines or supporting van-pooling, along with other 
programs such as providing cars or car repairs to low-income 
individuals. Wisconsin has even found that assisting with indirect 
barriers such as transportation of children to and from child care 
facilities is critical in allowing some individuals to improve their 
job prospects.
  A recent University of Illinois Chicago study found that the societal 
benefits from this program are $1.65 per dollar spent and estimated 
lifetime benefits to low-income participants of $15 per dollar spent 
due to their ability to find and retain better paying jobs. While the 
goals of the Job Access and Reverse Commute program are important and 
the program has been found to

[[Page S8279]]

be fairly effective, there are some details that have prevented the 
program from reaching its full potential. Working closely with 
transportation officials in Wisconsin and partially based on 
recommendations from the UIC study, I've come up with some specific 
ideas to improve the program.
  With a proven effective program and continuing unmet needs by 
employers and low-income individuals seeking employment, it seems clear 
to me that JARC could use a boost in funding. So that is why my 
proposal ramps up funding by $100 million over 5 years from the current 
funding of $165 million to $265 million in fiscal year 2014.
  My proposal would also allow the Federal share of projects to 
increase to 80 percent from the current 50 percent level for operating 
expenses. The 50 percent local and State match wasn't feasible for far 
too many local governments in Wisconsin and as a result Wisconsin has 
not been able to spend all its Federal funds. The higher Federal cost 
share will better balance the need to leverage Federal funds, while 
ensuring that these critical funds are fully utilized--millions of 
dollars in an account does nothing to link people to jobs.
  Besides the challenge in coming up with a 50 percent local cost 
share, the other main issue that has kept JARC from being as effective 
as it could be is the paperwork and reporting burden required by the 
program, especially for the small nonprofit groups that often have 
never dealt with Federal grant requirements before. My proposal directs 
the Federal Transit Agency, FTA, to examine the current reporting 
requirements to see if there are ways to streamline the amount of 
paperwork required while still ensuring that the program goals are met.
  My bill also includes a pilot program funded at $10 million a year 
for 5 years in order to test a few areas that seem very promising, but 
should be evaluated more before broader implementation. The first 
portion of the pilot program builds off the regulatory streamlining 
evaluation and allows the FTA to test streamlined reporting 
requirements to help get the balance between oversight and 
administrative burden in proper balance.
  The second part of the pilot program focuses on improving education 
and employment-related transportation for teens and young adults. 
Enabling students and young people to reliably get between their high 
schools or neighborhoods and technical colleges, job training centers 
or apprenticeships can have a life-long positive impact.
  The third section of the pilot program would allow experimentation 
with combining different transit programs and integrating JARC projects 
across local political boundaries to provide a more comprehensive local 
transportation system. Instead of having one transit program to assist 
the disabled, one targeted toward the elderly and another focused on 
jobs, this pilot program would encourage funding combined applications 
to meet these needs together with one comprehensive project. There is 
even the potential for the Department of Transportation to further 
coordinate with other departments such as Health and Human Services for 
health care-related transportation. Similarly, the needs of employers 
for employees does not recognize local political boundaries, so 
encouraging greater collaboration between local entities to make a more 
robust interconnected system should ultimately provide more efficient 
and effective service.
  While the FTA already provides some technical assistance for the JARC 
program, my proposal provides a small boost in funding and some 
additional areas of emphasis. For example, after hearing about the 
struggles that some small nonprofits have with the reporting 
requirements, in addition to looking for ways to streamline the 
requirements, my proposal would direct the FTA to also provide some 
technical assistance especially targeted to this need.
  The final element of my proposal is the offset. The new spending 
authorized in the proposal is fully offset by rescinding highway and 
bridge earmarks that have not had funds spent from them despite being 
authorized over a decade ago as part of the TEA-21 highway bill. 
Helping connect workers and employers is a much better use of these 
funds than letting them sit unused in some obscure DOT account.
  Providing reliable transportation to low-income individuals only goes 
so far--it is the companies and innovators creating the jobs and the 
individuals seeking to better their lot through education or more 
challenging employment, that are doing the heavy lifting. That being 
said, transportation can clearly be a challenge for companies and 
workers and in the case of the JARC program can play an important 
supporting role.

                          ____________________