[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 107 (Thursday, June 26, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6231-S6232]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REMOVING THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS FROM TREATMENT AS A TERRORIST
ORGANIZATION
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
proceed
[[Page S6232]]
to the consideration of Calendar No. 852, H.R. 5690.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The clerk will state the bill by title.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (H.R. 5690) to remove the African National Congress
from treatment as a terrorist organization for certain acts
or events, provide relief for certain members of the African
National Congress regarding admissibility, and for other
purposes.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill,
with an amendment, as follows:
H.R. 5690
On page 2, strike line 12 through the end of line 21 and
insert the following:
(a) Exemption Authority.--The Secretary of State, after
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of
Homeland Security, or the Secretary of Homeland Security,
after consultation with the Secretary of State and the
Attorney General, may determine, in such Secretary's sole and
unreviewable discretion, that paragraphs (2)(A)(i)(I),
(2)(B), and (3)(B) (other than clause (i)(II)) of section
212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1182(a)) shall not apply to an alien with respect to
activities undertaken in association with the African
National Congress in opposition to apartheid rule in South
Africa.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I am very pleased the Senate will pass this
legislation to exempt the African National Congress from designation
under the Immigration and Nationality Act as a ``terrorist''
organization.
The historic role that the African National Congress played in ending
the era of Apartheid in South Africa is well known, and I suspect that
its designation as a terrorist organization is a surprise to many
Americans. That the organization Nelson Mandela helped create to fight
against an official policy of racism is deemed a terrorist organization
is wrong and should be corrected.
I commend Senator Kerry and Congressman Berman for their attention to
this issue, and the Members of the Judiciary Committee--Senators Biden,
Schumer, Whitehouse, Feingold, and Cardin--who have lent their support
to this effort.
The overly broad laws Congress passed in haste after September 11,
2001, continue to unnecessarily bar legitimate asylum seekers from the
sanctuary of the United States. I worked to ensure that the
administration has the authority to waive these laws for organizations
and individuals, but the administration has been unwilling to exercise
this authority of its own accord.
Secretary Rice quite rightly pointed out that her government
counterpart in South Africa must apply for a waiver of the material
support bar in order to enter the United States for an official visit,
and that it is an embarrassment. I would hope and expect that this
embarrassment is no less acute when victims of violent conflicts are
denied asylum in the United States because of these same laws.
The Judiciary Committee's recent oversight hearing with Secretary
Chertoff was an example of an administration that will only make the
tough, but correct decisions when the scrutiny or public embarrassment
becomes too much. At this hearing, Secretary Chertoff announced that
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reversed its position on a
green card denial for an Iraqi who had been admitted into the United
States on a special visa from Iraq. Salam Kareem Ahmad entered the
United States after working as a translator for U.S. Marines in Iraq,
and after receiving commendation from General Petraeus, only to be
denied a green card by the administration.
Despite all of the administration's rhetoric about its commitment to
freedom and democracy, DHS determined that Mr. Ahmad's involvement with
an anti-Saddam Hussein group, the Kurdish Democratic Party, amounted to
involvement with a terrorist organization. It should not take political
pressure and media scrutiny to do the right thing. But in light of the
administration's inattention to resolving injustices created by the
material support bars, Congress is once again compelled to do what the
administration can and should be doing on its own.
There is much work to be done by Congress and the next administration
to fully resolve the terrible consequences these laws have brought
about. I intend to continue working toward ensuring that our
immigration and asylum laws are not used in a manner to harm those who
come to the United States seeking its refuge and assistance. Our
policies concerning asylum seekers have demonstrated America's
commitment to human rights. The material support and terrorism bars
that have prevented so many from our protection are a blemish on this
legacy.
Mr. KYL. Mr. President, I rise to say a few words about the impending
passage of H.R. 5690 and my amendment to that bill. My amendment
narrows the individualized waiver provisions in the bill by excluding
from waiver eligibility persons who are convicted of controlled-
substances offenses and those for whom there is reason to believe that
they will engage in terrorist activity after entry into the United
States. The amendment also requires that the activities for which
waiver is sought have been conducted ``in association with the African
National Congress.''
With my amendment, the bill's grant of authority does not exceed that
created by section 691 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, on
which I commented on December 18 of last year. Separate legislation is
not needed to exempt Class III groups that are eligible for a waiver
under section 691, a class that surely includes the African National
Congress. I hope that in the future such matters will be addressed
administratively rather than legislatively. Nevertheless, by enacting
today's bill we impress upon the executive the importance of exercising
that authority in a prompt and thorough manner. We trust, of course,
that the executive will not use such authority to grant waivers to
persons who, for example, engaged in violence that was deliberately
targeted at innocent civilians. But we do expect the relevant agencies
to act to avoid the diplomatic embarrassments of the past. With the
changes made by my amendment, I commend H.R. 5690 to my colleagues.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the committee
amendment be agreed to, the bill, as amended, be read the third time,
passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, with no
intervening action or debate, and that any statements relating to the
matter be printed in the Record.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The committee amendment was agreed to.
The amendment was ordered to be engrossed and the bill to be read the
third time.
The bill was read the third time.
The bill (H.R. 5690), as amended, was passed.
____________________