[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 96 (Wednesday, June 11, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5461-S5462]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HIGH COST OF ENERGY
Mr. REID. Mr. President, when President Bush took office, one of the
airplanes flying us to the west coast, or to the Midwest, or to the
southern part of the States from Washington, DC, the cost of a tank of
fuel for that airplane was 15 percent of the overall cost of the
airline. Today, after 7 years and 6 months of President Bush, it now
costs those airline companies almost 50 percent of the total costs. So
it has gone from 15 percent to almost 50 percent.
All over America, airlines are eliminating flights that are full.
Why? Because those airplanes cost too much to run. Every airplane
flying across America today is losing money--every commercial airline--
because the cost of fuel is so high. Think about that. Eighty-five
percent of the cost of an airline could be other things when President
Bush took office; now it is 50 percent. Airlines are in deep trouble.
I repeat, airplanes taking off from Washington, DC, or other places
in America, and are full, with every seat taken, those flights are
being eliminated because that type of airplane uses too much fuel. They
are doing everything they can to eliminate the need for extra fuel.
They are hosing down airplanes to save a quart of fuel here and there.
Mr. President, it is a desperate situation that the American airline
industry has. In addition, our airlines are having difficulty competing
with the European airlines. They pay in euros; we pay in dollars. We
pay approximately, let's say, $1.40 per gallon--we know that is wrong,
but the mathematical calculation is the same--and Europe pays about 80
cents. We cannot compete.
Mr. President, when President Bush took office, a gallon of gasoline
in a motor vehicle was less than $1.50. Now, this morning, it is
announced that the average cost in America is over $4.05 a gallon. That
is what has happened during the Bush administration.
The day before yesterday, I met with the National Association of
Manufacturers. The biggest concern they have is the cost of energy. One
relatively small American manufacturer who has been quite successful--
totally American--said this year, so far he has to
[[Page S5462]]
borrow or come up with another $6 million--he doesn't know where he is
going to get it--just to take care of the problems attributed to rising
energy cost.
In spite of all this, in spite of the problems we face in America
today with gasoline, people are trying to take public transportation
when they can, but in rural America there is very little public
transportation. Vacations are being stopped. In spite of all this,
yesterday, the Republicans stopped us from going forward on legislation
that would ease some of the problems.
For example, in the matter we are talking about when morning business
closes, we think it is time to look at the subsidies the oil companies
get. During the past year, they made about $250 billion in profits--net
profits. Yet we subsidize these oil companies. We believe that should
be looked at closely.
We also believe we should look at a windfall profits tax. We also
believe--and there is bipartisan support for this; Senator Specter
talked about this, and Senator Kohl is our major mover on this issue on
this side--OPEC scholars believe, and members of our Judiciary
Committee believe they are violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. But
there is a question as to whether they are subject to that. What these
Senators and others want to do--and that is part of our legislation--is
make them subject to the antitrust laws in this country. They make most
of their money in America. Why shouldn't our laws apply? We were
stopped from going forward to debate that issue.
There is a school of thought today that believes the problems with
the cost of oil are based on speculation--pure speculation. If the
Presiding Officer wanted to leave and buy a share of General Motors or
Ford stock--and Kirk Kerkorian is buying about 1 billion dollars' worth
of Ford stock today--if you want to buy stock in Ford or General Motors
today, you would have to put up 50 cents, which is your margin, for
every dollar you buy. But not with oil. Some margins with oil are 3 to
5 percent. There is a lot of speculation going on.
We wanted to take a look at that but, no, the Republicans said: We
are not even going to let you legislate on that matter. It seems to me
that is what we should do. If they don't like our proposal, let's do
something they think would be appropriate. Let's legislate.
Mr. President, I think it is pretty clear we cannot produce our way
out of the problems we have with energy. Take ANWR and all of the
offshore, and we in America have about 3 percent of the oil in the
world. So it is obvious we cannot do that. Can we do a better job in
production? Of course we can. We do certain things, and we have done
certain things, such as allowing more offshore drilling off the coast
of Louisiana.
The answer to all of this is not drill, drill, drill. The answer is
to do something to help save our world. Global warming is here because
we have taken, for well more than a century, carbon out of the Earth
and put it into the sky. It has caused our Earth to be sick. We have a
fever. Global warming is here. So we not only have to face this issue
and recognize we don't need more fossil fuel, we need alternative
renewable energy. That is what we tried to move to yesterday. The
Republicans would not let us.
We have entrepreneurs in America who want to invest money in
renewable energy--the Sun, the wind, geothermal. They want to invest,
and we want to be able to give them tax credits as incentives. But, no,
not with this Republican minority, not with this Republican President.
The answer is no, no, no to directly affecting energy costs and doing
something to allow us to move to renewable energy.
If that weren't enough, yesterday, to show what is going on with the
Republicans and to indicate to the American people why they keep losing
these special elections--one in Illinois, one in Louisiana, and one in
Mississippi--look what they are doing. Yesterday, the Judiciary
Committee had a hearing on torture to find out why America--the United
States of America--why we were torturing people who were being picked
up for being suspected terrorists. All we wanted to do is hold a
hearing. No. In the Senate, if you don't want a hearing to go forward,
and we have been in session for more than 2 hours, you can stop it. So
we had to recess the Senate to go ahead with the hearing anyway.
They do not even want us to do oversight. So we are going to come
today and talk about the calamity facing America with the oil prices.
The Presiding Officer and I just left a meeting of people concerned
about food--food. Senator Dorgan from North Dakota indicated that the
cost of fertilizer in the small, sparsely populated State of North
Dakota, in 1 year, has gone from $400 million to $800 million. Those
farmers are trying to figure out a way to pay for that. People all
around that table were people concerned about food. The problem is
energy costs.
Yet in the Senate, we are not allowed to debate that because
Republicans want to maintain the status quo. The status quo will not be
maintained much longer. We may have to put up with President Bush and
his policies for 7 months, if he is not willing to work with us. We may
have to put up with the obstructionism of the Republicans for another 7
months, but the day is going to change come November when the elections
are held because we will no longer have the slim majority we have now,
and we will be able to legislate for the American people.
____________________