[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 92 (Thursday, June 5, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S5128]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ELECTED TO LEAD
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, let me say that at this moment we are on
Thursday of this workweek with the possibility and likelihood of a
cloture vote tomorrow morning in the Senate. If one looks at the
business of the Senate this week, it is a good thing we are not being
paid for piecework because we have done so little.
We had an initial motion to go to this climate security bill, which
is an important piece of legislation. That was considered early in the
week, and then a second measure, which was very brief, on adopting a
budget--an important document but one that had already been debated at
length many times in this Chamber. We burned 30 hours off the clock in
what was requested for a general debate. That, of course, took place,
and it was a good debate: a bipartisan effort to explain an important
bill involving global warming and carbon pollution which is changing
the world we live in.
Then a request was made yesterday by the Republican leader that this
bill, the Climate Security Act, be read in its entirety into the
Record. So for 8 hours, our staff had to stand and read every word of
this bill into the Record. This bill--the substitute--had been
available for days and the concepts behind it for weeks. There was no
element of surprise, no necessity for this reading, other than to burn
off an entire day in the Senate where little or nothing was
accomplished. Now we face virtually the same thing again.
Although 89 percent of the people in America say that global warming
is an important issue that should be addressed by the Senate, this week
there have been repeated efforts to make sure we never reach that
point. Those who oppose this bill should stand and vote accordingly.
Those who have amendments should bring them forward. We are still
waiting for a list of amendments to the global warming bill from the
Republican side. We have given them a list of our amendments, including
a bipartisan amendment offered by Senator Lugar, who just spoke on the
floor, and Senator Biden. We have tried to engage the minority in a
debate on this critically important bill, but instead, they have
engaged in delay tactics, including 8 hours wasted in the Senate
yesterday reading this bill in its entirety.
We finally adjourned at about 12:15 a.m. this morning to return
today. I guess it is the intention of the Republicans to stop us from
considering the global warming issue, but that will not stop the
dangers being created by global warming in the United States and around
the world. If we are truly elected to lead, I cannot understand why the
Republican minority will not engage us in a meaningful and honest
debate about this bill. That is why we are here. We should be voting on
amendments, testing different theories and policies to see what the
majority feels in the Senate, but instead, we are caught up in this
exercise: 8 hours of reading this bill--a tremendous waste of time and
energy that the Senate should have put to more productive purposes.
I yield the floor.
____________________