[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 78 (Tuesday, May 13, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4098-S4099]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FAA REAUTHORIZATION
Mr. ENSIGN. Mr. President. I wish to speak about Government barriers
to competition in the aviation sector. Like many of my colleagues, I am
disappointed that the Senate was unable to pass the legislation
reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration last week. This is a
difficult and dynamic time for the aviation industry, and it is
important that Congress review and update our Nation's aviation
policies.
Rising ticket prices and increasing delays have made the flying
experience more unpleasant for many travelers. Any inefficiencies
introduced into the system only serve to exacerbate such problems.
Therefore, I believe it is important that Congress reduce barriers to
competition whenever possible so that the marketplace can best serve
consumers and the public interest.
One issue that needs to be addressed is how Government-imposed slot
controls at a handful of U.S. airports effectively bar the entry of new
airline competitors at those airports. These federally regulated slot
controls are intended to reduce congestion-related delays; this
congestion mitigation, however, comes at the expense of open
competition.
Once slots at an airport have been doled out to the airlines, it
becomes very difficult for new entrant carriers to break into the
airport because the market has essentially been closed. Airlines with
limited operations at these airports face similar problems should they
wish to increase their presence in an effort to compete with the larger
airlines. Because the marketplace has been artificially constrained,
this leads to higher ticket prices and fewer flight options for
travelers.
It has been proven time and again that prices go down and flight
options go up when airlines are allowed to freely compete. The
Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration
should take every step possible to ensure that competition can flourish
at these slot-controlled airports. As these agencies administer
congestion programs, I hope that they will develop mechanisms that will
allow for new entrants to compete with
[[Page S4099]]
the more entrenched airlines at these airports. If they are unable to
do so, it may be up to us in Congress to provide them with legislative
guidance to ensure a more open marketplace.
Another arbitrary barrier that Congress should address is the
outdated perimeter restriction at Ronald Reagan Washington National
Airport. For over 40 years, Federal law has restricted flights at
Reagan National and delayed the arrival of competition at the airport.
With Senator Boxer and Senator McCain, I introduced an amendment to the
FAA reauthorization bill to revise Reagan National's outdated perimeter
restriction.
The American flying public has shown strong demand for more flights
between the Western United States and the Washington, DC, area.
Unfortunately, the perimeter rule prevents airlines from responding to
that demand by largely prohibiting flights to western cities such as
San Francisco, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Denver, and Seattle. Revising the
Reagan National perimeter restriction would help free-market
competition, directly benefiting consumers. While I am disappointed
that the FAA reauthorization bill was pulled from the floor before my
amendment could be considered, I will continue to work with my
colleagues to find a way to revise the perimeter restriction so that
air service between the West and Reagan National is increased in a
market-based manner.
We owe it to the American flying public to squeeze every last bit of
efficiency out of our aviation system. As the Senate considers aviation
issues in the future, I hope my colleagues will work together to reduce
the artificial barriers to competition created by well-intentioned yet
burdensome Government regulations.
____________________