[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 66 (Thursday, April 24, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Page S3393]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXPANDED DNA COLLECTION
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I was concerned to learn from the
newspapers last week that the Federal Government is getting ready to
publish a rule sanctioning the collection of DNA samples from all
citizens arrested for Federal crimes and from many people detained as
illegal immigrants. These samples may even be kept permanently as part
of the Government's DNA database even if a person is ultimately
exonerated.
I have long supported the analysis of DNA evidence to catch the
guilty and exonerate the innocent. In 2000, I introduced the Innocence
Protection Act, which included the Kirk Bloodsworth Post-Conviction DNA
Testing Grant Program for defendants. This program, where appropriate,
gave defendants access to the postconviction DNA testing necessary to
prove their innocence in those cases where the system got it grievously
wrong. As a former prosecutor, I was acutely aware that DNA testing
could help prevent both the conviction of innocent defendants, and the
criminal justice nightmare of the real wrongdoer remaining undiscovered
and possibly at large.
In 2004, Congress passed the Innocence Protection Act as an important
part of the Justice for All Act. Congress recognized the need for
important changes in criminal justice forensics despite resistance from
the current administration. The Justice for All Act authorized several
other important programs to encourage the use of DNA evidence, which I
strongly supported, notably including the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog
Grant Program to eliminate the nationwide backlog of rape kits and
other evidence awaiting DNA testing in crime labs around the country.
That important program has helped law enforcement to find the
perpetrators of terrible crimes throughout the country and to ease the
ordeal that crime victims go through.
But DNA testing, like any powerful tool--and particularly any
powerful tool in the hands of the government must be used carefully. If
abused, it can infringe on the privacy and civil liberties of Americans
while doing little to prevent crime. I am concerned that the policy
just announced may do exactly that.
When Senator Kyl proposed the legislation that formed the basis for
this policy, I said that it raised serious privacy concerns. Right now,
a person's DNA can be collected immediately upon arrest, and it can be
used immediately to search the DNA indexes for a possible ``hit.'' But
it cannot be added to the Federal index unless and until the person has
been formally charged with a crime. This new policy allows DNA to be
entered for those who have been arrested but not charged.
This change adds little or no value for law enforcement, while
intruding on the privacy rights of people who are, in our system,
presumed innocent. It creates an incentive for pretextual arrests and
will likely have a disproportionate impact on minorities and the poor.
This policy may also make it harder for innocent people to have their
DNA expunged from government databases.
Since I first spoke out against this provision in 2005, we have only
seen more examples of abuses of power by this administration, including
the Justice Department's improper firing of prosecutors for political
reasons and the FBI's abuse of national security letter power given in
the PATRIOT Act. In this light, the added power to collect and keep DNA
information from potentially innocent people gives even more cause for
concern.
I will study the proposed rules and policy carefully, and the
Judiciary Committee will perform careful oversight of its
implementation. We must ensure that DNA evidence is used aggressively
and efficiently to make us safer, but also that it is used in a careful
and appropriate way that secures our rights and increases our
confidence in our justice system.
____________________