[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 22, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3214-S3216]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
VETERANS' BENEFITS ENHANCEMENT ACT
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, of course the bill is not being held
up, and of course the majority does not need permission from us to take
up the bill. Today we will, in fact, vote on the cloture motion to
proceed to the Veterans' Benefits Enhancement Act of 2007. It is my
belief cloture should be invoked and will be invoked.
There is actually much to commend in this bill. It will improve the
lives of our veterans by supplementing the level of assistance for
disabled veterans for the purchase of automobiles and increasing
assistance for those veterans who need to modify their homes to
accommodate their disabilities.
I wish to recognize with admiration my colleague from North Carolina,
the ranking member of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and thank him
for his hard work on this bill. Yesterday, he made clear that he will
offer a substitute that seeks to correct the one glaring flaw contained
within S. 1315, a provision that would divert $221 million over the
next 10 years to create a special pension for Filipino veterans of the
Second World War living in the Philippines who have no service-
connected disability. That money, of course, would be diverted at the
expense of American veterans living in America. The Senator from North
Carolina spoke eloquently about the fact that diverting these resources
from our veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan represents
misplaced priorities, and I agree with him.
My expectation is the Senate will have a healthy debate concerning
this provision. Senators on my side of the aisle will have ample
opportunity to amend the committee bill so we can have a bill that will
pass with bipartisan support and be signed into law. It is my hope we
can work together on this bill and produce another strong, bipartisan
achievement for our veterans. I expect that to happen certainly in the
very near future. We will have an opportunity in our conference at noon
to discuss going forward, but we anticipate moving forward with the
Burr amendment early in the process. I think we are going to be able to
get a strong, bipartisan accomplishment in the very near future in the
Senate.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I want the world to hear what the Republican
leader just said: We are not holding up the bill. That simply is
without any basis of fact. That is why we are going to vote at noon on
being able to move to the bill. In years past, it was done
automatically. Rarely did we have to file a motion to invoke cloture on
the motion to proceed. It is Orwellian, what my friend just said. Of
course they are holding up the bill. And we have asked other times to
move to this legislation, as far back as November 2007.
So, Mr. President, I now ask unanimous consent that following morning
business, we move to the bill, we vitiate the need to invoke cloture on
the motion to proceed, that all germane amendments would be in order--
and certainly what Senator Burr said he wanted to do would be totally
germane. It is a striking provision.
I ask unanimous consent that following morning business, the Senate
move to the bill that is before the Senate.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection?
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I really
think any observers will find all of this quite silly, really. We are
going to discuss the measure at noon. Many in my conference are not on
the Veterans' Affairs Committee and have not had an opportunity to hear
from Senator Burr about this issue. Yesterday was a no-vote day.
Members were not around. We are going to discuss the matter at noon.
I already indicated to my good friend the majority leader that we are
going to be able to move forward, I think, with dispatch on this issue,
and we are going to get a bipartisan accomplishment. No amount of
trying to steamroll the minority into giving up its rights is going to
work. Maybe that is one of the reasons this Congress has a lower
approval than the President of the United States. My good friend the
majority leader never misses an opportunity to talk about the President
not being very popular. Every time in the future the majority leader
wants to bring up the President's popularity, I will bring up the
popularity of this new
[[Page S3215]]
majority which makes the President's popularity look really good.
What I think the American people would like for us to do is to quit
this silly sparring back and forth, and finger-pointing, and legislate.
We have a very good chance to begin this week with a strong bipartisan
accomplishment, and I think we ought to get about it. As soon as lunch
is out of the way and Senator Burr has had an opportunity to brief our
Members on this measure, with which many of them are not yet familiar,
we will sit down, as we always do, the majority leader and I, with
smiles on our faces, and figure out how to go forward. And I think we
will be able to get there in the relatively near future.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection?
Mr. McCONNELL. I object.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Objection is heard.
Mr. REID. So that it is very clear, the statement of the Republican
leader was untrue. He can talk all he wants about finger-pointing. All
we want to do is legislate. That is what we want to do. And it would
seem to me, as this legislation has been pending for 9 months--reported
out of the committee 9 months ago--that since we are dealing with the
veterans, the people for whom we want to do the very best we can
because they deserve it, that in 9 months the Republican caucus would
have been able to focus on veterans and health care and not wait until
today, April 22--or whatever today is, 9 months after the legislation
was reported out of the committee--to determine what is in the
legislation. Senators need to be briefed on how to take care of our
soldiers medically? I think that is without any foundation.
I will also say this, Mr. President: I feel very good about my job as
a Senator. I am very grateful to the people of Nevada for allowing me
to serve in the Senate. But I am never going to come to the floor and
denigrate this body, as my Republican friend obviously wants to do. The
rating of the Senate, over the history of the country, the rating of
the Congress is tied to the President. If the President is unpopular,
the Congress is unpopular, the city council is unpopular. If you have a
popular President, everybody feels good about the Government itself. So
I will never come to the Senate or anyplace else and denigrate my job
and those of my 99 colleagues. I think we have important
responsibilities, and I think we should live up to those in a manner
that is best in keeping with the Senate tradition.
I came here this morning to state a fact. I want to legislate on
behalf of the Senate on legislation dealing with the medical care of
our veterans, and it is being held up by the Republicans. That is
clear. That is what I said, and I stand on that.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. At the risk of prolonging this a little longer, I
don't think, at the end of the day, anybody in the country is going to
believe we are obstructing this bill. This is a serious effort to
legislate. Senator Burr has taken it very seriously. He has an
important amendment to be offered, which will be offered later today.
The Senate will have an opportunity to consider it.
Look, the way you get things done in the Senate is on a bipartisan
basis, and the rules around here give the minority an opportunity to be
involved. This is not the House of Representatives. I wish we had been
able to get more done last year, but one of the reasons we didn't is
because we had 34 Iraq votes. Some of my friends in the other
conference told me last year that any week they weren't voting on Iraq
was a bad week. We spent an awful lot of time on sense-of-the-Senate
resolutions on Iraq last year.
Floor time is at a premium in the Senate, as the majority leader used
to say repeatedly when he was the leader of the Democratic Party and in
the minority. The Senate is not the House. Things don't move as
speedily. Most observers of the Senate understand that. By Senate
standards, this bill is going to move forward in relatively rapid order
after the rights of the minority to offer amendments have been
protected.
So I don't know what this little back and forth this morning is all
about because I do think we are going to have an opportunity to get a
bipartisan accomplishment in the very near future.
I yield the floor.
Mr. REID. What this is all about is the truth. That is what it is all
about.
Senator Durbin, assistant majority leader, on November 8, 2007, said
this: This is Senator Durbin speaking, Mr. President.
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate may proceed to the
consideration of calendar No. 336, S. 1315, at any time
determined by the majority leader following consultation with
the Republican leader; that when the bill is considered, the
only amendments in order to the bill, other than the
committee-reported amendment, be first-degree amendments that
are relevant to the subject matter of the bill and that they
be subject to relevant second-degree amendments; that upon
disposition of all amendments, the committee-reported
substitute amendment, as amended, if amended, be agreed to;
the bill, as amended, be read the third time, passed, and the
motion to reconsider be laid upon the table.
The Presiding Officer asked: Is there objection?
The Republican side: Objection.
The objections to this go back months. So what is this about today,
the Republican leader says? It is about the truth. It is about the
Republicans stalling everything that comes up--everything--and then to
have the audacity to come to the floor and say: We are not stalling
anything.
We should have been on this bill a long time ago.
And during the period of time the Republican leader complains we were
having numerous Iraq votes, we were trying to change the course in
Iraq, Mr. President, because it needed changing, and it still does.
We have been here I don't know how many seconds this morning, but
every second we have been here we have been spending $5,000 in Iraq--
$5,000 a second or $12 billion a month. During the period of time he
complains about our offering amendments related to the war in Iraq, our
troops were getting killed at the rate of more than one a day. Tens of
thousands have been wounded. A third of them are missing eyes. Their
minds aren't good. One-fifth of them have brain problems--injuries to
their brains. We have more than 3,000 double amputees and thousands and
thousands of single amputees. We have an obligation to the American
people to talk about the war in Iraq, and we are going to continue to
do that.
So we don't apologize to anyone for the votes we took on Iraq. The
first many years of this war--a 6-year war now--the war went along with
the Republican leadership in the House and the Senate doing nothing
about the war except patting the President on the back. We have not
done that. We have been critical of the operation of the war in Iraq,
but we have done everything we can to support our troops. We were the
first to call for more body armor for the troops. We were the first to
call for up-arming the vehicles so they wouldn't be killed as easily in
those vehicles. We have done everything we can to support the troops.
We have done everything we can to change the course of the war in Iraq.
The President has not allowed us to change the course of the war in
Iraq, and we are here today for the truth. The truth is, we are trying
to legislate for the American people and change the status quo. The
Republicans want to maintain the status quo.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Republican leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, with all due respect to my good friend,
the majority leader, the American people are giving Congress such low
approval ratings principally because of the rhetoric and the tone and
the feeling that we can't accomplish anything.
I don't know why, on this particular Tuesday morning, at about the
time we are going to go to a bill on which we could achieve an
important bipartisan accomplishment, we want to engage in this kind of
rancorous debate. We will have plenty of highly contentious issues to
come before us. That is the nature of the legislative process. And
certainly we have spirited debates in the Senate. But on the measure
that we are about to go to later today, I think there will be very
little difference of opinion, and at the end of the process we are
likely to have a bipartisan accomplishment that we can all feel good
about.
So I would hope we could improve our moods and attitudes this week as
[[Page S3216]]
we go forward and see if we can't accomplish something important for
the veterans of our country.
I yield the floor.
____________________