[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 58 (Monday, April 14, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2960-S2961]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 2008
Mr. WEBB. Madam President, as we approach the anniversary of the
Virginia Tech tragedy, I am introducing legislation to implement one of
the key recommendations from the Virginia Tech Review Panel that was
formed by Gov. Tim Kaine to examine some of the issues that arose
following the shooting.
It is exactly 1 year this week when a disturbed young man took the
lives of 32 students and faculty and wounded several others on the
campus of Virginia Tech. I commend the Virginia Tech community for
pulling through such a difficult time and for the tremendous amount of
courage they displayed. I also wish to extend my continuing sympathy to
the families of the students and faculty who were directly impacted by
these shootings.
On April 19, 2007, 3 days after the Virginia Tech shooting, Governor
Kaine announced the formation of the Virginia Tech Review Panel to
perform a review of the events of April 16. This panel included
individuals with the expertise and autonomy necessary to conduct a
comprehensive review. These nationally recognized individuals brought
expertise in many areas, including law enforcement, security,
governmental management, mental health, emergency care, victims'
services, the Virginia court system, and higher education.
The genesis for the legislation I am introducing is the report
prepared by this panel and released to the public in August 2007. A
similar report was prepared for President Bush by the Attorney General
and the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and Education in
follow-up to meetings with
[[Page S2961]]
various experts across the country. Both reports documented serious
concerns from individuals in various communities throughout Virginia
and the Nation regarding the treatment of student medical records.
One main theme that kept resonating in various communities was
concern with the appropriate balance between providing for the safety
of our communities while at the same time protecting privacy rights.
Too many college administrators are unsure how to balance the right to
privacy against public safety, and Federal law and regulations are of
little help.
This bill simply attempts to clear up any ambiguity that currently
exists within the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, known as
FERPA, which allows for the sharing of student educational records in
order to protect the health or safety of a student or the general
public.
FERPA, written in 1974, was created at a time when schools did not
provide the health care services they do today. According to the
National Institute of Mental Health, half of all lifetime cases of
mental illness begin by age 14. Schools today, whether they are K-12 or
a post-secondary institution, have critical student health records in
their hands.
It is important for Congress to ensure that we provide our school
officials, administrators, and counselors clear Federal guidelines to
protect the privacy and to ensure the safety of our students. My bill
attempts to address the concerns raised by school officials,
administrators, and institutions in interpreting FERPA.
If one looks back at the recommendations of the Virginia Tech Review
Panel, one notices that a key resounding issue is the misinterpretation
of Federal and State privacy laws. My bill does three things to amend
FERPA so that tragic situations such as the one at Virginia Tech are
less likely to occur. First, it adds an explicit ``safe harbor''
provision to make clear that no violation of FERPA occurs if a school
official discloses information in a good-faith belief that it is
necessary to protect the health or safety of a student or the general
public. Second, it clarifies how FERPA applies to student treatment
records held for treatment purposes. Third, it clarifies the emergency
exception in FERPA to emphasize that in an emergency, information-
sharing is allowed if done in a good-faith belief that doing so will
protect against a possible threat to the health or safety of a student
or the general public.
This is a straightforward attempt to address several recommendations
that were made by the Virginia Tech Review Panel in clarifying the
widespread perception that information privacy laws make it difficult
to respond effectively to troubled students. It is important for school
officials to use their best professional judgment in deciding when to
disclose or not to disclose information without fear of violating
Federal educational privacy laws.
There is widespread agreement that existing law is in need of
clarification. In this regard, I note that the Department of Education
proposed a rule on March 24 of this year, which is an attempt to
clarify and give guidance to university administration on what they can
and cannot do in handling treatment records. I believe this bill is a
more direct and effective way to achieve that desired clarity.
Together with the passage of the Mental Health Parity Act in both the
House and Senate and other measures to ensure access to mental health
services, my bill will be a good step in addressing this growing issue
of mental disorders that is all too common in many communities. I look
forward to working with my colleagues in the Senate for quick passage
of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act Amendments of 2008.
Madam President, I yield the floor, I thank the Chair, and I suggest
the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the order for the
quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cardin). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________