[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 51 (Wednesday, April 2, 2008)]
[House]
[Page H1943]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1615
AMERICAN DEATH TOLL IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, when the American death toll in Iraq hit
4,000 on March 23, there was a great deal of coverage about it in the
media. But the media only seems to care about the death toll when it
reaches a special milestone. But now that the number of dead has
reached 4,012, they have packed up their cameras, they have gone back
to ignoring Iraq. Once again, our brave soldiers are dying in virtual
anonymity, surely paying the highest price.
Here at home, the administration's occupation policies are harming
American people in other ways. I am talking about the millions of
Americans who are suffering because we are spending our Nation's
treasure in Iraq rather than on vitally-needed social and economic
programs here at home. We're spending about $4,600 every second on the
occupation, or about $12 billion a month.
Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize winning economist, has calculated
that the occupation will ultimately cost $3 trillion, and that, Mr.
Speaker, is a conservative estimate. And it will certainly cost a whole
lot more if the administration gets its way and we establish permanent
bases in Iraq or the others get their way and we remain involved in
Iraq for 50 to 100 years.
This enormous drain on our resources has buried us so deeply in debt
that we cannot make investments in the programs that would really move
our Nation forward. Just think of what we could do with all of those
trillions of dollars.
We could invest in the education of the 48 million children in our
public schools. We could prepare them to compete and win in the global
economy.
We could invest in early childhood education and the childcare that
millions of poor and middle-class families so desperately need.
We could invest in the medical research needed to cure disease and to
save millions of Americans from needless suffering and from premature
death.
We could invest in our infrastructure and new green technologies
which could produce millions of jobs around our Nation.
We could produce an economic stimulus package to fulfill remaining
unmet needs.
We could help States and cities to provide their first responders
with the equipment they need to save lives in the event of terrorism or
natural disasters.
We could build more affordable housing and assist those who have been
caught up in the mortgage meltdown.
We could provide health care to our citizens, starting with SCHIP for
our children.
We could move to ensure the solvency of Social Security.
We could invest in global health. As a member of the Foreign
Relations Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health, I can tell you that
every single dollar spent on global health is a dollar spent to make
our world more peaceful and stable.
These are just a few examples, Mr. Speaker. We couldn't do them all,
but if we did just a few, we would go much further toward safeguarding
our national security than we are currently doing in Iraq.
I hope my colleagues will remember this when General Petraeus arrives
next week with his bar charts and statistics. Let us remember that the
turmoil in the Middle East is helping to spike gas prices at the pump.
It is leading us deeper and deeper into the effects of the Iraq
recession.
The responsible redeployment of our troops out of Iraq is the one
policy that makes sense, and the one policy that the great majority of
the American people support. It is high time for us to do what the
American people expect us to do, and they expect us to end our
occupation of Iraq.
____________________