[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 40 (Monday, March 10, 2008)]
[House]
[Pages H1434-H1435]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON CONSTITUTIONAL WAR POWERS RESOLUTION OF 2007
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Jones) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. JONES of North Carolina. Madam Speaker, this Thursday, March 13,
2008, the International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight
Subcommittee will conduct a hearing on ``War Powers for the 21st
Century: The Congressional Perspective.'' I would like to thank
Chairman Bill Delahunt and Ranking Member Dana Rohrabacher for
scheduling this hearing. It is my understanding that Chairman Delahunt
and Ranking Member Rohrabacher also plan to hold two additional war
powers hearings during the month of April.
I am extremely grateful for their interest in this very important
issue. Along with former Congressmen David Skaggs and Mickey Edwards,
who are cochairmen of the Constitutional Projects War Powers
Initiative, this Thursday I will testify on the legislation I
introduced in October of 2007, the Constitutional War Powers
Resolution, H.J. Res. 53.
Too many times this Congress has abdicated its constitutional duty by
allowing Presidents to overstep their executive authority. Our
Constitution states that while the Commander-in-Chief has the power to
conduct wars, only Congress has the power to authorize war.
It is for this reason that in 1999 I joined 16 of my colleagues in
Congress to file a suit against President Clinton for
unconstitutionally conducting offensive military attacks against
Yugoslavia without obtaining a declaration of war or other explicit
authorizations from Congress.
[[Page H1435]]
Now, as threats to international peace and security continue to
evolve, the Constitutional War Powers Resolution, H.J. Res. 53,
rededicates Congress to its primary constitutional role of deciding
when to use force abroad.
In 1793, James Madison said, `` . . . The power to declare war,
including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and
exclusively vested in the legislature . . . the executive has no right,
in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause
for declaring war.''
The Framers of our Constitution sought to decentralize the war powers
of the United States and construct a balance between the political
branches.
{time} 1945
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 aimed to clarify the intent of the
constitutional Framers and to ensure that Congress and the President
share in the decision-making process in the event of armed conflict.
Yet, since the enactment of the resolution, time and again Presidents
have maintained that the resolution's consultation, reporting, and
congressional authorization requirements are unconstitutional obstacles
to executive authority.
By more fully clarifying the war powers of the President and the
Congress, the legislation I've introduced, H.J. Res. 53, the
Constitutional War Powers Resolution, improves upon the War Powers
Resolution of 1973 in a number of ways. It clearly spells out the
powers that the Congress and the President must exercise collectively,
as well as the defensive measures the Commander in Chief may exercise
without congressional approval. It also provides a more robust
reporting requirement that would enable Congress to be more informed
and to have greater oversight. And it protects and preserves the checks
and balances the Framers intended in the decision to bring our Nation
into war.
Madam Speaker, I look forward to congressional hearings on this
critical issue. The time for Congress to meet its constitutional duty
is long overdue.
And with that, Madam Speaker, I would like to ask God to continue to
bless our men and women in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to ask God to
continue to bless the families of our men and women in uniform.
____________________