[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 27, 2008)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1234-S1235]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRIBUTE TO WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY, JR.
Mr. LIEBERMAN. Mr. President, this morning we learned of the death of
William F. Buckley, Jr. I wanted to come to the floor and reminisce a
bit about Bill Buckley, whom I have been privileged to know for more
than 40 years, and to pay tribute to a devoted and patriotic American,
a remarkably creative and eloquent man of letters, a person with an
extraordinary sense of humor and a kind of spirit to him that infused
anyone around him.
He was a person who believed in the power of ideas and loved the
exchange of ideas. He lived a remarkable life, with great effect for
this country that he loved, and a tremendous impact on people who read
his novels, his books, and his columns in the National Review, or
watched him for so many years on that wonderfully thoughtful, cerebral,
provocative TV program ``Firing Line,'' which was open not just to
conservatives such as Bill Buckley, but to people with all shades of
opinion who were willing to engage him--Bill Buckley, WFB--on the field
of ideas. A remarkable man.
I was privileged to get to know him more than 40 years ago when I
became the editor--at Yale, of course, editor wasn't a good enough
title. I was called the chairman of the board of the Yale Daily News.
And there was a gentleman at the Yale Daily News named Francis
Donahue--Tackie Donahue--and he had been there forever as the permanent
business manager. I remember the day after I was chosen, he told me he
had informed Bill Buckley of this in one of his regular memos back and
forth to Buckley. I was fascinated by this and began a communication
with Bill Buckley at that time, and he took a wonderfully warm, kind of
brotherly interest in those who were at the Yale Daily News, as he had
been in the early 1950s. He invited me and a couple of our friends from
the news to come to his house in Stamford, CT, for a dinner or two,
which were stimulating, thrilling evenings.
Our friendship went on, and I will come back to that, but Buckley's
life is an extraordinary life. He came out of Yale, became very well
known for a book he wrote about what he thought was the hostile
environment at Yale toward people of faith, toward people who were
conservative, et cetera, et cetera, ``God and Man at Yale.'' He went
from that to starting the National Review in the mid-1950s. I believe
it was 1955. I remember reading once that he had said in the founding
issue that the publication would derive from original ideas of the
moral order.
Bill Buckley was a person who studied history, studied literature,
learned from it, and also was infused with a deep and profound
commitment to his Roman Catholic faith. That, I think, was the origin
of the moral order which he gave expression to in all that he did in
writing for the National Review and speaking out and conducting himself
as a provocative, loving American. He believed that ideas mattered, and
they did.
The National Review, in some sense, gave birth to the modern American
conservative movement. But it wasn't always a Republican movement. His
was a matter of ideals and ideas and philosophy--conservatism.
Incidentally, he rejected extremism. To his everlasting credit, he took
on the extremists of the John Birch Society, which wasn't popular for
him to do at the time he did it.
I am just remembering words of Buckley. He said he was a conservative
ideologically, not always favorable to Republican candidates. I
remember reading about an editorial he wrote in the National Review
endorsing General Eisenhower for President. While everyone else was
echoing the slogan ``We Like Ike,'' Buckley's editorial said, ``We
Prefer Ike.'' So it was a relative judgment that he made.
He was thrilled, of course, much more by the candidacy of a former
Member of this body, a distinguished Member, Senator Barry Goldwater,
and most of all by the candidacy of President Reagan. At one point, in
the mid-1960s, he ran for mayor of New York. And again as a kind of
joyous, thought-
[[Page S1235]]
provoking, elegant, eloquent exercise in being involved in the
marketplace of public ideas, perhaps most famous, though perhaps not
the most substantive thing he said in that campaign, is when they asked
what he would do when he was elected. Bill Buckley famously said: I
will demand a recount. And that is a good message for all of us when we
approach campaigns.
Well, I continued to be involved with him in communication in many
ways. My wife and I had the privilege of spending wonderful evenings
with him and his late wife Patricia at their home in Stamford, CT.
These were classic evenings of great food, some drink, and good
spirited conversations--cigar and brandy to follow--but always open to
ideas and always with a ready willingness to laugh. In fact, he passed
away earlier today, apparently in his study in his magnificent home on
Wallace Point in Stamford, CT, probably working on a column or some
other piece of writing.
I was particularly grateful to him for all that I learned from him,
all the good times I had with him, and in some sense, you might say I
would not be a United States Senator were it not for Bill Buckley,
although Buckley would not say that. When I ran for the Senate in 1988,
let's just say with the diplomacy that marks this Chamber that Bill
Buckley was not a fan of the incumbent Republican Senator, and he
called me up and said--I wish I could impersonate him--Joe, I'm
thinking of endorsing you. Do you think that will help?
I said: Well, now, that's very good of you. Then he interrupted and
said: Please understand this is the only time I am likely to endorse
your career. So I said that it probably would; what do you have in
mind?
Well, he actually wrote a column, a very good column in the National
Review, and I think in his syndicated column. He also, with the
puckishness that was part of him, started something he called Buck PAC,
which was, he said, a PAC open to anyone in Connecticut whose name was
Buckley and who was committed to the defeat of the incumbent Senator at
that time. He printed bumper stickers and the like and helped out in
the campaign.
I said to him after I won that election--and I won it by very
little--that I thought that in a close election--as the Presiding
Officer of the Senate knows, there are so many reasons one is
successful--but I said: You have reason, Bill, to take part of the
credit. I won by less than 1 percent of the vote. And I said: You know,
I would go so far as to say you played a rabbinical role for me in this
campaign.
Well, what do you mean by that? So I said: Your endorsement of me and
the columns you wrote said to Republicans in Connecticut who really
didn't like the incumbent Senator, it is kosher to vote for Lieberman.
And he laughed. I remember that well.
There is so much I could say about his contribution to our country,
to his openness to ideas, to his civility. One could disagree with Bill
Buckley, as I did quite frequently, and never lose respect or
affection, dare I say love, for a wonderful human being. We would all
benefit from that.
I perhaps would close this impromptu tribute to Bill Buckley,
mourning his loss today, by offering condolences to his family: Chris
Buckley, his son, who is a wonderful writer and confuses me as well as
others with the multisyllabic words that he uses just as his father
did; his sisters, Priscilla L. Buckley of Sharon, where the family has
longed lived; Patricia Buckley Bozzell of Washington; Carol Buckley of
Columbia, SC; his brothers, Judge James Buckley of Sharon, CT, and F.
Reid Buckley of Camden, SC; and a granddaughter and grandson.
I pray that they will be strengthened by their faith and comforted by
good memories and pride and the extraordinary person in Bill Buckley.
I think most fitting of all, I will end with a quote from President
Reagan on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the National Review
in 1985. Reagan says when he first picked up his first issue of
National Review, he received it in a plain brown wrapper and still
anxiously awaited his biweekly edition but no longer in a plain brown
wrapper.
But this is what Reagan said of Buckley:
You didn't just part the Red Sea--you rolled it back, dried
it up, and left exposed, for all the world to see, the naked
desert that is statism. And then, as if that weren't enough,
you gave the world something different, something in its
weariness it desperately needed, the sound of laughter and
the sight of the rich, green uplands of freedom.
I thank the Chair for giving me the opportunity to bid farewell in
this Senate Chamber to a great American and a dear friend, William F.
Buckley, Jr. I pray with confidence and the faith that Bill Buckley had
that his soul will be taken up truly in the bonds of eternal life.
I yield the floor.
____________________