[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 192 (Friday, December 14, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S15648-S15649]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UPCOMING GENERAL ELECTIONS IN KENYA
Mr. FEINGOLD. Madam President, the last time I devoted a floor
statement to Kenya it was to condemn the assault by elite police and
paramilitary commandos armed with AK-47s on the offices of the Standard
Group's offices in an attempt, by the government of that time, to
prevent an independent newspaper from publishing a story on a sensitive
political matter. That was nearly 2 years ago--in March 2006--when
Kenya's President Mwai Kibaki and senior members of his government were
facing serious charges of bribery, mismanagement of public funds,
inadequate governance reform efforts, and political favoritism.
Unfortunately, while some reform measures have been instituted,
corruption continues to choke Kenya's government and permeate society
as efforts to curb such practices have been significantly
deprioritized. Transparency International's 2007 Corruption Perceptions
Index shows Kenya sliding down to number 150 out of 179 countries, on
par with Zimbabwe and Kyrgyzstan.
More encouraging have been the increasingly engaged voices of the
Kenyan people and the dynamic media that has developed since the last
election. The last election showed the people of Kenya that their votes
did count enough to bring about a change, and the independent press has
simultaneously expanded and strengthened remarkably. Media outlets have
not allowed themselves to be intimidated as they persist in exposing
government mismanagement. Furthermore, while the courts are not
entirely independent, they have taken up several high-profile cases,
and some key ministers have been forced to resign. While Kenya's
democracy is increasingly robust, it is nevertheless still quite young.
The new few weeks may reveal just how much progress has been made--and
how much progress is likely to be made in the future.
In two weeks--on Thursday, December 27--Kenyans will go to the polls
to vote for their President, Parliament, and local officials. Five
years ago, the Kenyan people went to the polls and unambiguously
rejected years of mismanagement, corruption, and declining economic
growth by overwhelmingly electing the opposition National Rainbow
Coalition, NARC, to power, ending
[[Page S15649]]
more than 40 years of rule by the Kenya African National Union, KANU.
President Kibaki and his administration deserve credit for advancing
basic freedoms and permitting the emergence of a vibrant civil society,
but his failure to rein in corruption in government ranks has him now
just trailing Raila Odinga, his main contender in the presidential
race.
The fact that these elections are so close and hotly contested is a
good sign for Kenya's democracy. For the first time, a number of
parties appear to be taking small but noticeable steps away from ethnic
loyalties and towards more legitimate political platforms. Such a
development is an essential component as the country moves towards
better governance, and I am so pleased by all the work the
administration--and in particular the embassy in Nairobi--is
undertaking by working closely with the Electoral Commission of Kenya,
political parties, civil society organizations and other international
partners through a new multidonor-funded, comprehensive electoral
assistance program. Such initiatives are vital to help bring about a
strong democracy.
As the 2007 national elections approach, however, there are a number
of challenges to a peaceful and fair multiparty process. Like other
Kenyan polls before it, this campaign period has been fraught with
violence and accusations of fraud. The electoral commission is
investigating reports of voting cards being bought, and the primary
conventions of the mainstream political parties were interrupted by
violence and chaos. On balance, there are those who say security has
gotten better, but violence continues at unacceptable rates and around
16,000 Kenyans have been displaced in election-related violence.
Last May, the United States Ambassador to Kenya, Mr. Michael
Ranneberger, addressed the Kenyan government and political community.
He promised that the United States would be neutral in the elections
and in building the capacity of political parties and civil society,
but he made it clear that, and I quote, ``We are not neutral with
respect to . . . the conduct of elections. We want to see an inclusive,
fair, and transparent electoral process.''
As voting day draws near, it is essential that the international
community speaks with one voice in calling for all parties to refrain
from violence and fraud before, during, and after the upcoming polls.
Kenya's political elite, military officials, judicial bodies, and 14
million registered voters must understand that the world is watching
closely for signs that Kenya is truly committed to good governance and
rule of law. Kenya's important leadership role in the region and
throughout the continent make it particularly important that the
government ensure the open flow of information, freedom of assembly,
and nonpartisan conduct of the polls. Further, the government must
refrain from any misuse of its resources or authorities in the runup to
the election and on Election Day. All parties should renounce efforts
to enflame tribal hatred, which means that politicians need to control
their rhetoric, eschew violence, and avoid threats.
International support for Kenya's upcoming polls includes a large
number of foreign observers who will be dispersed across the country to
witness the polling on Election Day. Reports from these monitors and
independent media will inform opinions around the globe not only when
it comes to assessing the past 5 years of President Kibaki's
administration but also in determining the legitimacy of the next
government. In 2 weeks, all eyes will be on a country that is an
important role model of stability and growth in a region beset by
natural and manmade disasters. It is not only Kenya's next president
and other political leadership who will be decided on December 27, but
it is also the state of its democracy.
____________________