[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 168 (Thursday, November 1, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Page S13680]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE, EN BLOC HOTLINES
Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, I wish to share my concerns regarding the
process currently being utilized by the Energy and Natural Resources
Committee to pass legislation on the Senate floor. As many of my
colleagues know, I am currently objecting to unanimous consent on two
en bloc packages reported by the committee, containing more than 40
bills.
I want to make clear to my colleagues that I do not object to all of
the bills contained in the two packages. In fact, I have offered to
give consent to all those bills where I have no fiscal or policy
concerns. Unfortunately, the committee is insisting on passing all of
the legislation en bloc and will not allow the noncontroversial bills
to be released for passage. These bills are in effect being held
hostage by the committee.
As my colleagues know, I evaluate all unanimous consent requests, in
part, on whether the proposed legislation increases authorizations for
spending. If it does, I also look to see whether the new cost has been
offset by a corresponding reduction in another program authorization. I
also review each bill for specific policy concerns.
Of most concern to me, the two packages authorize over $150 million
in new spending, without a single offset. This does not include the
$640 million reauthorization for the Geologic Mapping Program. I have
offered to work with the committee to identify possible offsets that
would allow the en bloc packages to move forward. Given the
considerable program oversight performed by the committee, I am eager
to hear where it believes other programs may not be working as intended
or where they may have become of a lesser priority than the bills
currently under consideration.
As stewards of the Federal tax dollar, I believe it is imperative we
proceed with the hard but necessary work of prioritizing our spending.
Every American taxpayer is forced to do this every day, and so should
we. Prioritization begins with the authorization process, and so does
long-term fiscal discipline.
I renew my pledge to work with any Member of this body to identify
offsets, to ensure that our actions today never add to the already
heavy financial burden we have placed on the next generation of
Americans.
It is my hope the committee will abandon the practice of en bloc
unanimous consent requests. Each bill should be considered on its
merits, and if it is truly worthwhile, should be allowed to stand on
its own. As an institution, this Senate is more than capable of this
task.
To make the Record absolutely clear, I am including the list of
noncontroversial bills in these packages that should be cleared and
allowed to pass under unanimous consent: S. 216, S. 266, S. 241, S.
202, S. 232, S. 262, S. 220, H.R. 386, S. 320, S. 553, H.R. 497, H.R.
658, S. 1139, H.R. 235, H.R. 482, H.R. 467.
____________________