[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 167 (Wednesday, October 31, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H12348-H12349]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE VIETNAM WAR REDUX
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, the first national protest demonstration
against the Vietnam War occurred 40 years ago this month. About 100,000
Americans came to Washington in October 1967 to protest that foreign
policy disaster.
Vietnam was a war of choice. We invaded a country that never attacked
us. We sent our troops into the middle of a civil war that had nothing
to do with us. We went to war in a country whose culture or history we
did not understand. We had no exit strategy.
We went to war after Congress authorized the President to do so. We
[[Page H12349]]
found out later that the congressional resolution was based on false
information supplied by the administration.
The Vietnam War divided our people. It led to the deaths of thousands
of American troops and countless innocent civilians. It undermined our
moral leadership in the world. We went to war alone. We were isolated
from our allies. It was a propaganda victory for our enemies.
There is more, Mr. Speaker. We propped up an often corrupt government
that couldn't figure out how to rule. We kept waiting for South
Vietnamese troops to stand up so we could stand down. The Vietnam War
squandered our Nation's treasure. It diverted us from solving our own
domestic problems.
We said the war was all about spreading freedom. But the people of
the country we invaded saw it as a foreign occupation. The occupation
went on year after year. It passed from one administration to another.
Our leaders kept telling us victory was just around the corner if we
put more troops in. It devastated the country we were trying to save.
It was a political, economic and moral catastrophe for America.
That was Vietnam. But it sounds exactly like Iraq. Today we are
repeating the same terrible mistakes in Iraq that we made 40 years ago
in Vietnam. Some of the Members of this House who support our
occupation of Iraq lived through Vietnam. They have had 40 years to
think about it. Yet they still miss the point. The doctrine of
preemptive war is not suited to America because we are not warmongers.
The American people do not believe in shooting first and asking
questions later.
There is one other mistake we made back then that I hope we won't
repeat, but I am afraid we will. The war in Vietnam spread to another
country when we bombed Cambodia. Today, there is growing evidence that
the administration is getting ready to spread the war in Iraq to
another country. That would be Iran. About a week ago, the
administration warned that Iran would face serious consequences if it
proceeded on its current course. We all wonder what that means. Does it
mean another round of shock and awe? Another country for our reckless
leaders to bomb?
But the administration needs to consider the ``serious consequences''
that America will face if we attack yet another Middle Eastern country.
Our occupation of Iraq has produced a fresh new crop of terrorists.
Using military force instead of diplomacy to get Iran to act
responsibly will certainly do the same.
In 1999, Mr. Speaker, when America was involved in Kosovo, the then-
Governor of Texas said, and I quote him, ``Victory means exit strategy,
and it's important for the President to explain to us what that exit
strategy is.'' That Governor of Texas is now in the White House. But he
is not following his own advice.
The administration has no exit strategy for Iraq. So it is up to
Congress to provide one. We must use our power, the power of the purse,
to defund the war. Then we must fully fund the safe, orderly and
responsible redeployment of our troops' withdrawal and the withdrawal
of all military contractors. Then we must launch a vigorous regional
and international diplomatic effort to bring peace to Iraq and help it
rebuild.
A few years ago, the administration called for an initiative to
improve Americans' understanding of history. Our leaders in the White
House should start by learning the history of Vietnam.
____________________