[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 153 (Wednesday, October 10, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H11470-H11471]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
END THIS ENDLESS WAR IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Doggett) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. DOGGETT. Madam Speaker, on this unfortunate day 5 years ago, a
majority of this House enabled President Bush to proceed with his
tragic ``go it alone'' war. He was dead certain then, and he was dead
wrong then. He is dead certain today, and once again dead wrong. As a
result of his choices, we approach now some 4,000 Americans whose lives
have been lost, perhaps as many as another 30,000 who have been
disabled.
Our Treasury, of course, has been disabled of what is scheduled to be
probably a trillion or more dollars out of our Treasury that could have
been spent right here at home on more causes that would have touched
and protected the American people, their health care and economic
security.
After this 5 years, I think it is important to look back and realize
that despite the position of the Republican leadership, the Republican
administration, and most of the Democratic administration, that in this
House that day 5 years ago, a substantial majority of House Democrats
voted against this war that should never have been launched.
We say today that the best course for this country to pursue is a new
course, a change of course, not just more of the same old thing as the
President proposed in his escalation, as he has implemented in his
escalation, but a genuine change in course.
We need to end this endless war in Iraq. We really already have a
blueprint of how to do it, how to implement a safe and orderly
redeployment. The United Kingdom, the only one of our allies to offer
any substantial help in Iraq, is already redeploying and seems to be
indicating that their troops will be out of Iraq next year. We need to
join that coalition, the coalition of refocusing on priorities here at
home, because what we have done in Iraq has not made our families
safer. As one independent study after another has shown, what we have
done there has made our families much less safe than had this adventure
never been launched.
For the last 5 years, this administration has repeatedly presented us
with false choices. Remember, there would be a mushroom cloud, perhaps,
if we waited to find the smoking gun to justify the invasion of Iraq to
find all these weapons of mass destruction that never existed. Now we
hear the same old deadly course is the only alternative to a
``precipitous withdrawal.'' Well, I don't know of anyone who is
[[Page H11471]]
proposing a precipitous withdrawal. There are other reasonable
alternatives. We believe that the better course, a new course, is a
safe, orderly, fully funded, phased redeployment. The British already
have this underway.
{time} 1845
The British already have this underway. We can follow their example,
and we can follow the leadership of the American people reflected in
one study after another, that they want that kind of change in course.
The choice to redeploy or not is a decision about priorities. While
it is true that the big cost of what we are doing there is measured in
the blood of the brave, we are also hemorrhaging some $3 billion in
Iraq expenditures right out of our Treasury, week after week, month
after month.
The President vetoed the Children's Health Insurance bill, because
even too little for our children seems to be too much for him. Half a
trillion dollars for a war already that he chose in Iraq, but for the
children of America's working poor, he brusquely tells us, they can
just go to the emergency room. With millions of children uninsured, it
is too soon to declare ``mission accomplished'' there, just as it was
too soon for him to make that declaration years back and many deaths
back in Iraq.
In Iraq and with the Children's Health Insurance Program, we believe
that the President is on the wrong course and that we cannot afford to
wait until he departs office to end this war and to end the
indifference that he has shown toward our children.
This fifth anniversary then should be commemorated with thoughtful
consideration of alternatives for new courses and new avenues to
address the tremendous damage that has been done by this faulty policy
of preemptive war. I believe that we need in these next few months to
continue to focus on the wrongs that have been committed, the damage
that has been done, and bring people together behind a genuinely new
course that we have not tried before, and that is a complete but
phased, safe and orderly, fully-funded redeployment of our troops that
will protect our families, that will assure our Nation's security, and
will not continue with the hemorrhaging that we have suffered these
last many years.
____________________