[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 121 (Thursday, July 26, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10139-S10140]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LANDMINES IN COLOMBIA
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the people of Colombia have endured decades
of civil conflict characterized by widespread killings and
disappearances of civilians perpetrated by rebel groups and
paramilitary death squads, sometimes with the active participation of
government security forces. In recent
[[Page S10140]]
years, both rebels and paramilitaries have financed their illegal
activities through the sale of cocaine, which has also corrupted
government institutions.
Each year since the inception of Plan Colombia, the United States has
provided Colombia with more than half a billion dollars in mostly
military and counter-drug assistance, totaling more than $5 billion.
The primary goal of Plan Colombia, at least as sold to the Congress,
was to decrease by half the amount of coca produced, resulting in
commensurate reductions in the income derived from cocaine to the
rebels and paramilitaries and the amount of cocaine entering the United
States.
While there is no reliable evidence that Plan Colombia has affected
either the price or availability of cocaine in the United States, the
Office of National Drug Control Policy reports that profits from
illegal drugs to the FARC rebels declined by about one-third between
2003 and 2005. This is welcome news. But whether this trend has
continued since then or has ebbed and flowed like most other statistics
relating to drug cultivation and trafficking in Colombia, is unknown.
Unfortunately, it is also not yet apparent that this reported reduction
in profits has affected the FARC's ability to operate.
While the majority of killings of civilians during the 7 years of
Plan Colombia are attributed to paramilitaries, sometimes with the
active or tacit support of government forces, the FARC has engaged in
many atrocities, including attacks against civilian targets and
kidnapping. But perhaps the most insidious of their crimes is the
widespread use of landmines.
According to a report released yesterday by Human Rights Watch,
casualties from landmines used by the FARC, as well as by another rebel
group known as the ELN, have risen steadily in recent years. As is so
often the case with landmines which are triggered indiscriminately by
the victim, most of the casualties in Colombia have been civilians.
While the number of casualties did not exceed 148 a year in the
1990s, Human Rights Watch reports that last year the number was 1,107.
This increase contrasts sharply with the worldwide decline in the use
of these insidious weapons. In fact, Colombia is among the more than
150 nations that have signed or ratified the international treaty
banning antipersonnel mines.
According to press reports, the FARC defends its use of mines by
claiming that they are used only against government security forces,
not civilians. That, however, is a specious claim, since mines are
inherently indiscriminate. They will kill or maim whoever comes into
contact with them, often months or years after they are laid. I have
seen photographs of the horrific injuries suffered by both government
soldiers and innocent civilians from rebel mines.
While the FARC, like others who continue to use landmines, would
undoubtedly claim that their military utility justifies their continued
use, I reject that argument. The harm to civilians and the
contamination of the countryside caused by mines cannot be justified.
While there are programs to assist Colombia's mine victims with
rehabilitation and vocational training, they are far from adequate. I
have supported efforts to increase U.S. assistance. We are looking at
ways to use the Leahy War Victims Fund to assist Colombian civilians
who have been injured by mines, and we are supporting United for
Colombia's efforts to obtain surgery in the U.S. for Colombian soldiers
who have suffered grievous mine injuries.
I have been a consistent critic of human rights violations in
Colombia where impunity remains a persistent problem. There have been
thousands of killings of civilians, including of human rights
defenders, union members, journalists, and others who have been
targeted by one armed group or another. Hardly any of these crimes have
resulted in convictions and punishment. But none of that excuses the
continued use of landmines by the FARC and ELN. As I have said many
times before, the use of landmines should be a war crime. It is
barbaric; it is inhumane; it is indefensible.
____________________