[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 116 (Thursday, July 19, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H8173-H8174]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
(Mr. BLUNT asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute.)
Mr. BLUNT. Mr. Speaker, I yield to my good friend the majority leader
for the purpose of inquiring about next week's schedule.
Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
On Monday, the House will meet at 10:30 a.m. for morning business and
noon for legislative business, with votes rolled until 6:30 p.m. In
addition to several bills under suspension of the rules, and a list of
these bills, of course, will be announced by the end of the week, we
expect to begin consideration of the fiscal year 2008 Transportation-
HUD appropriations bill.
Let me reiterate that because that will require a vote on the rule,
there will be a substantive, and perhaps more substantive, votes on
Monday. So Members cannot be assured that there will not be
controversies on the floor on Monday night. Usually we do only
suspension bills.
On Tuesday, the House will meet at 9 a.m. for morning-hour business
and 10 a.m. for legislative business. On Wednesday and Thursday, the
House will meet at 10 a.m. On Friday, the House will meet at 9 a.m. In
addition to completing consideration of the Transportation-HUD bill, we
have one additional fiscal year 2008 appropriations bill, the Commerce-
Justice-Science, as well as the farm program reauthorization.
Mr. BLUNT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for that information.
I notice there is no listing at this point of an Iraq bill on next
week's schedule. I also notice that FISA modernization has not been
scheduled. I wonder if the gentleman has any information about the
potential for either of those two issues to be on the schedule for next
week.
Mr. HOYER. FISA legislation, as the gentleman knows, is being worked
on by the Intelligence Committee now. I don't have a specific answer
for you. I am hopeful that we will perhaps be able to address some very
important issues before we leave here.
On the other, I think it is possible that we will have some
legislation dealing with Iraq, but that decision has not been made.
Obviously, there is still ongoing discussion both in the Senate and in
this body on that subject. But whether there will be legislation next
week is still in discussion.
Mr. BLUNT. I thank the gentleman for that and, of course, just to ask
when that decision is made, the quicker we could be told what that
decision is and get a sense of the schedule on that issue, the better.
Also, I have one question the gentleman might have information on. In
the conference on the 9/11 bill earlier this week, it appeared that the
protection that the House had added for liability in what was called
the John Doe action, where if you suggest someone you think is pursuing
a dangerous course of action, you turn them in, then you are personally
held liable, we had some protections added to our bill on that. I am
told that the chairman of the conference, a member of the other body,
has now said that he believes those protections would be germane, and
if they are germane, we would hope that we would continue to see an
argument in favor of that. But I wonder if the leader has any
information on that.
Mr. HOYER. I tell my friend that I do not have any immediate
information on that particular issue. I know the issue, but where it
is, I am not sure. So I don't have specific information on that.
Mr. BLUNT. Let me ask one other question about conferences, and that
would be unless this proceeds into
another area.
Mr. HOYER. I can say with respect to conferences, we have every
intent of doing the 9/11 conference, as the gentleman knows, and
passing that before we leave for the August break.
Mr. BLUNT. I would ask on conferences, in a press report this week
there was a suggestion, as a matter of fact, I think it was today, that
the ethics bill might come to the House under an extraordinary
procedure that didn't actually involve a conference. I think the House
changed its rules this year to be much more stringent on requiring a
conference, and I am wondering if that report has any merit to it that
the gentleman would be aware of.
Mr. HOYER. I understand press reports, but there is no decision that
has been made on that.
Mr. BLUNT. I just would suggest to the gentleman that we have changed
the rules in a way that, while that particular messaging between the
two Houses has seldom been used, I think it is even harder to do in
light of the House rules changes, and we would hope that these bills
are done in conference and, of course, hope they are done in conference
in accordance with the rules that this Congress has proposed for
conferences.
Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, will my friend yield?
Mr. BLUNT. I would.
Mr. HOYER. We are very, very hopeful that the lobbying disclosure
conference can proceed. As the gentleman
[[Page H8174]]
knows, we have not gotten clearance on the other side to do so, so we
are very concerned about that. This House passed the lobbying
disclosure bill overwhelmingly. Our view is it will pass overwhelmingly
in the Senate when that happens. But, unfortunately, it has not yet
gone to conference.
I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. BLUNT. I thank the gentleman for his comments. And I also
understand frustrations with the Senate process as he does and hope
that we can work that out in a way that we go through the regular
process.
Mr. HOYER. I thank the gentleman.
____________________