[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 112 (Friday, July 13, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9208-S9209]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EFFORTS TO STALL PROGRESS
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I would like to outline some of the
legislative activities of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Some would rather pick fights about controversial judicial nominees.
The disappointing decisions from this year's Supreme Court term remind
us that this President has been quite successful in moving the Federal
courts to the right. This President has not only appointed two members
of the Supreme Court but has also already appointed almost one-third of
the 871-member Federal judiciary. When the appointments of his father
and other Republican Presidents are considered, more than two-thirds of
all current Federal judges were appointed by Republican Presidents.
Of course, the Judiciary Committee has been engaged in oversight
efforts this year with regard to the U.S. attorney scandal and other
examples of White House interference with Federal law enforcement.
Despite the attitude of the current administration, our Constitution
does not include the phrase ``unitary executive'' or ``executive
privilege.'' What the U.S. Constitution does provide in the oath of
office is that the President must swear to ``faithfully execute the
Office of President of the United States'' and ``preserve, protect and
defend the Constitution of the United States.'' His essential duties
require him to ``take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.'' I
have great concern with regard to how this administration is fulfilling
those essential duties. The political intrusion into the law
enforcement functions of the Government through the scheme to fire and
replace our U.S. attorneys is most troubling.
The recent decision to override a prosecution, jury trial, conviction
and prison sentence for one of his aides, to excuse his lying to
Federal investigators and a grand jury and his perjury, and to reward
his silence and purportedly bad memory seems an abuse of the
constitutional pardon power. The lack of accountability for anyone in
the Bush administration has reached new heights--or depths.
The secret determination to ignore our surveillance laws and engage
in years of warrantless wiretapping of Americans is another instance we
are investigating that appears at odds with the Constitution's
directive to ``take care that the Laws be faithfully executed'' and
that the liberties of the American people secured by the Constitution
be protected.
While our oversight efforts have taken a good deal of time and
effort, we have simultaneously succeeded in an ambitious legislative
agenda. That is what I would like to focus on for a few minutes. While
the committee has been productive in reporting a number of bipartisan
measures to the Senate, Republican holds have to date been blocking
Senate action on these measures.
Republican holds and filibusters have not been limited to obstructing
our efforts to support our troops, rebuild our National Guard, and
bring an end to the failed policies that have led to the deaths of so
many in a civil war in Iraq.
Let me mention a few examples of beneficial legislation that are
being stalled, as well:
We just observed the 41st anniversary of the Freedom of Information
Act ``FOIA'' on July 4. An important bipartisan FOIA reform measure--
the Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act, the
OPEN Government Act, S. 849,--was favorably reported in April. Its
consideration has been blocked by a Republican objection.
The OPEN Government Act promotes and enhances the public disclosure
of government information pursuant to FOIA. This legislation will also
provide much-needed reforms to strengthen FOIA by, among other things,
helping Americans to obtain timely responses to their FOIA requests and
improving transparency in the Federal Government's FOIA process.
This bill is cosponsored by a bipartisan group of 14 Senators,
including my lead Republican cosponsor Senator Cornyn. The OPEN
Government Act is also supported by more than 115 open government,
business and news media organizations from across the political and
ideological spectrum, including, the American Library Association, the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, OpenTheGovernment.org, Public Citizen, the
Republican Liberty Caucus, the Sunshine in Government Initiative and
the Vermont Press Association.
The passage and enactment of this important FOIA reform legislation
will improve government transparency and openness for all Americans.
The bill has now been stalled by Republican objection for several
weeks.
A second measure the committee reported months ago that has been
stalled by unspecified objection from the other side of the aisle is
The War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007, S. 119. This bill provides
a significant new tool for Federal law enforcement to combat the
scourge of war profiteering, which is needed now more than ever given
the ongoing reports of rampant fraud, waste, and abuse in Iraq and
Afghanistan. The bill now has the support of Senator Sessions, after
being modified to eliminate potential objections to specific language
in the bill and we have circulated an amendment to combine it with the
Sessions-Landrieu Emergency and Disaster Assistance Fraud Penalty
Enhancement Act of 2007, S. 863, to be a legislative package that
should win overwhelming bipartisan Senate support. Passage of this
measure is long overdue and is being blocked by unspecified Republican
objection.
A third measure that the Judiciary Committee unanimously reported was
the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Act, S. 535. This is a
good bill, authored by Senator Dodd and Representative John Lewis in
the House. The Senate bill and Senate consideration of the House-passed
companion measure have been blocked by yet another Republican
objection.
These are just three examples of matters currently being delayed and
obstructed by unspecified objection from the other side of the aisle.
The American people may begin to see a pattern.
[[Page S9209]]
Each of these measures should command majority support in the Senate.
They may be able to command supermajority support on their merits. If
we could only get to their merits. So while the Judiciary Committee has
remained productive, its efforts to enact helpful, remedial legislation
continue to be thwarted by Republican objections.
____________________