[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 108 (Monday, July 9, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8786-S8788]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TERRORISM
Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, during the last week that we were not here
during the Fourth of July recess, there was a lot of misinformation
floating around about things that may or may not be happening
concerning the war on terrorism. I would like to make some
clarifications, if I could.
I think it is very significant that we understand what is really
going on, not what some of the media tell us is going on. I have found
through my experience--and I say this: I come to the floor with
probably having made more trips to the Iraqi AOR, 14 in total, than any
other Member, so I have been there quite a few times. I have watched
the changes as the changes have taken place.
Let me share with my colleagues, first of all, a little background.
The United States Code defines terrorism as premeditated, politically
motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by
subnational groups or clandestine agents. Their goal is to inflict the
maximum amount of damage and pain to civilians irrespective of age,
race, gender, or religion. It will remain a global threat for the
foreseeable future. It is global. I think a lot of people don't realize
how global this is but, if we just look at the things that have
happened recently, including terrorist attacks in Somalia, Kenya, and
Tanzania. We remember in those places the Embassies being blown up. The
United States, France, Morocco, Turkey, Spain, Indonesia, Great
Britain, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Philippines, Algeria, Yemen, and
Tunisia are just a partial list of some of the places where there have
been terrorist attacks.
The National Counterterrorism Center reported approximately 14,000
terrorist attacks occurred in various countries during 2006. Over 50
percent of the attacks occurred in Iraq or Afghanistan. Reported
incidents decreased for Europe, Eurasia, South Asia, and the Western
Hemisphere.
Now, the following terrorist-related attacks occurred within the past
30 days outside of Iraq and Afghanistan. The mentality that somehow it
is all happening in Iraq is false. There were some statements made in
declaring certain areas in Iraq to potentially be the terrorism
capital, but we will talk about that in a minute.
A car bomb exploded outside of the Somalian Prime Minister's
residence killing six people. This is all in the last 30 days. A bomb
exploded in front of a crowded tea shop in Thailand killing 1 woman and
wounding 28 others. That was on June 8. An explosion outside the
[[Page S8787]]
Ambassador Hotel in Nairobi, Kenya, killed 1 and injured 37. I might
add that was a mere 3 days from the time I was actually staying in that
hotel. A bomb exploded outside a clothing shop in Istanbul, Turkey,
wounding 14 people. A car bomb in a Beirut seaside neighborhood killed
10 people and wounded 11 others. Suicide bombers drove an SUV into the
Glasgow airport doors, injuring six people. A suicide bomber drove into
a convoy of Spanish tourists, killing nine people and wounding five
others. That is just what has been taking place in the last month.
In the United States, President Bush organized and energized the
Federal Government to pass the PATRIOT Act which broke down the walls
between Federal law enforcement and intelligence communities. It
created the Department of Homeland Security, merging 22 different
Government organizations. It created the position of Director of
National Intelligence to seamlessly integrate operations of
intelligence agencies.
We have had this problem for a long time. I recall when I was first
elected, when I came from the House to the Senate, and my predecessor
was David Boren, who is now the President of Oklahoma University, and
the last thing he told me before I was sworn in was one of the biggest
problems we have is in coordinating our intelligence communities so
that everybody knows what everybody else is doing. We hadn't really
done that until 9/11 came along and we started getting serious about
it. I am sure President Boren will be very glad to know that this is an
important improvement that has been made. We directed the National
Security Agency to monitor terrorist communications and established a
program to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives. I
know there is a lot of talk about what is torture and what is not
torture. But we do know that HUMINT, human intelligence, is very, very
important. It is something we have to consider, the lives of those who
would be lost versus the lives of criminals who are being interrogated.
We placed state-of-the-art equipment in major cities in the United
States to detect nuclear and radiological weapons and biological
agents. We placed advanced screening and equipment and Homeland
Security personnel at foreign ports to prescreen cargo headed for the
United States.
I think it is very interesting that a lot of people are talking about
how much this has cost.
Everything I have read costs something. The question is, How many
lives has it saved? That is something very difficult to ascertain.
Fighting the terrorists is a coalition of more than 90 nations. It is
not just the United States, it is the United States and 90 other
nations--a coalition of nations that has sought to synchronize
diplomatic, intelligence, law enforcement, economic, financial, and
military power to attack terrorism globally. I believe it is working.
As the President has recently said, to strike our country, the
terrorists only have to be right once. To protect our country, we have
to be right 100 percent of the time. As we learned on 9/11, and many
times in other countries, it only takes one time for them to be
successful. We know that some of the results are significant.
We captured an al-Qaida operative named Ali Saleh al-Marri in the
United States, who we believe was targeting water reservoirs, the New
York Stock Exchange, and the U.S. military academies in December 2001.
This was the first post-9/11 plot that was thwarted. Al-Marri offered
himself as a martyr to Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11.
He was his No. 1 man. He sent him to the United States after he
received training in poisons at an al-Qaida camp.
It is kind of interesting that people say there is no connection
between Iraq and al-Qaida when, in fact, we know now and can release
information on several training camps that were there. Very likely, he
could have been trained in that particular camp.
The British authorities broke up a plot to blow up passenger
airplanes flying to America, which could have rivaled 9/11. We know
that happened. The plot was foiled in August of 2006. They planned to
blow up as many as 12 U.S.-bound passenger jets. They planned to use
liquid explosives hidden in carry-on luggage. U.S.-British authorities
had a group under surveillance for many months, and many of the
suspects were British citizens of Pakistani origin. They thwarted that.
That didn't happen. That could have happened and, very likely, would
have except for all these efforts of the United States and other
countries.
We broke up two other post-9/11 aviation plots--one targeting the
Library Tower in Los Angeles and the other targeting the east coast. An
al-Qaida leader in Southeast Asia, known as Hambali, recruited Jemaah
Islamiyah operatives of Asian origin. The plot was derailed early in
2002 with international cooperation. Library Tower is the tallest
building west of the Mississippi, 1,018 feet tall. It is among the 25
tallest buildings in the world. That didn't happen. That was planned.
It could have happened. It was stopped by this combined effort.
Four men were indicted in an alleged plot to attack John F. Kennedy
International Airport by blowing up a jet fuel supply. They planned to
hit the fuel farms and a 40-mile aviation fuel supply pipeline, and
they specifically targeted the symbolism of JFK, sought to invoke
emotional reaction saying, ``It is like killing the man twice.'' That
is their statement. Suspects were tied to extremist groups in South
America and the Caribbean, specifically Guyana and Trinidad. One
suspect was a former airport cargo worker. They sought massive
disruption of the U.S. economy by cutting off this major artery of
travel that connects the United States to the rest of the world--over a
thousand flights a day, half of which are international, 45 million
passengers and 1.5 million tons of cargo a year.
They disrupted a plot by a group of al-Qaida-inspired extremists to
kill American soldiers at Fort Dix in New Jersey, which was the result
of a 16-month investigation by the Justice Department and the FBI.
Suspects had taken an incriminating video to the store to be
transferred to DVD. The video showed calls for jihad and radical and
violent ranting in Arabic, including images of the men firing assault
weapons.
Terrorists attempted to detonate two car bombs using cell phones in
London's West End. That happened over the last recess we had. It
heightened public awareness and quick police action prevented
detonations of two Mercedes car bombs. This was a concerted effort. We
and the Brits were in on that. All others on this team worked very well
and very effectively.
Now, in Iraq, we have had success that is critical to our long-term
fight against terrorism. Osama bin Laden calls the struggle in Iraq a
``war of destiny.'' Al-Qaida sees victory in Iraq as a religious
strategic imperative, a base from which to launch new attacks around
the globe.
While I am troubled the war has cost us, I believe it is absolutely
necessary for us to be able to have this success. I can recall a year
ago standing at this podium in the Senate quoting al-Qaida, saying
Ramadi--that province in Iraq was going to become the terrorist capital
of Iraq. When I was in Ramadi a matter of days ago, we found that there
are new groups of people cooperating now that never cooperated before.
I think some of the people in this body who were talking about
surrender resolutions and all that--it got their attention. Maybe that
performed a useful function because all of a sudden the people woke up.
I learned something there too. All these political leaders we hear
about, such as Prime Minister Maliki and Defense Minister Jasim and Dr.
Rubiya, and some of the rest--I thought they were the ones who were the
leaders. I think it is the clerics in the mosques. All of a sudden,
they became concerned and, up until that time, we had been monitoring
all of the procedures and the performances they have had on a weekly
basis in the mosques. Eighty-five percent of them have been, up until
December of this last year, anti-American messages. As of April, there
haven't been any anti-American messages. That shows that the clerics
have gotten involved in this thing. In Tulsa, OK, we have neighborhood
watch programs, where people get neighbors to watch and see what is
going on. This is happening throughout Iraq, where they are spraying
orange spray paint around IEDs that haven't
[[Page S8788]]
been detonated so our troops could disarm them. Those things have
happened. I think the joint security stations have been very successful
in Baghdad. Instead of our troops going out and coming back into the
green zone at night, they stay and get to know and develop close,
intimate relationships with the Iraqi security forces and their
families. That has had a tremendously positive effect.
The future will be difficult in the fight against terrorism. It is
not a sprint, it is a marathon. We have to remain vigilant, determined,
and strong. I want our troops to come home as badly as anybody. When
you think about the consequences of losing this thing, all it would
take for these people who are crying out about their feelings and
saying let's get out of Iraq, all it would take is one successful
terrorist attack similar to those that have been stopped through this
joint effort. We would have to pay dearly.
I hope people will sit back and realize we have access to information
the general public doesn't have. Sure, the polls show the majority of
people would like to have our troops come back. I would, too, but when
you ask the questions and give them the alternatives, they would rather
win this war than resign from it.
____________________