[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 108 (Monday, July 9, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Page S8759]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          ADVANCING THE ISSUES

  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I listened with interest to my good 
friend, the majority leader. Let me make a few random observations 
before making some remarks about the Defense authorization bill.
  He indicated there have been 42 cloture motions filed. That is quite 
a lot, no question about it. The reason that was necessary, of course, 
is because the majority was trying to truncate the legislative process, 
which, in the Senate, unlike the House, gives the minority considerable 
opportunity to offer amendments.
  Typically, the way these things are done is to be worked out. Cloture 
motions do not always produce the desired result of the majority, and 
we look forward to having fewer cloture motions, not more, as a better 
way to actually pass more legislation.
  With regard to the August recess, I certainly would be prepared to 
stay here and work. I recall the majority leader and I were here the 
last time that was tried in 1994, when we stayed here 2 weeks into the 
August recess, to try to pass the national health care plan supported 
by then-President Clinton and his First Lady, Hillary Clinton. After 2 
weeks of frustration, Senator Mitchell gave up and the recess began. 
Sometimes that kind of device would be helpful; other times it may not 
be.
  I worry a good bit about the fact we have not done any appropriations 
bills yet. The basic work of the Government is to fund the agencies of 
Government. We do it through 13 appropriations bills. We have not 
passed any yet. I do worry we will end up with a process that could 
lead us in the direction we went last year under my party and in 2002 
when the Democrats were in the majority, which led to kind of a total 
meltdown of the appropriations process. I hope that can be avoided. 
There will be a lot of cooperation on this side of the aisle to prevent 
that from happening. But we do need to schedule the bills and actually 
pass them if we are going to have a chance to have anywhere near a 
normal appropriations process.
  With regard to the 9/11 bill, as my good friend the majority leader 
knows, we were prepared to go to conference on that bill the Friday 
before the recess. No request to go to conference was actually 
propounded on that day. I think if we can have our staffs exchange some 
language, there is no good reason why we cannot go to conference on the 
9/11 bill very shortly, maybe even including today.
  With regard to the lobbying bill, it was my intention to go to 
conference on the lobbying bill. We had an objection on this side of 
the aisle. The objector came over here, made the objection, and that is 
the way the Senate works. There is still strong support for that bill 
on this side of the aisle. It was the first bill the majority leader 
brought up, with my concurrence and cooperation. We passed it with only 
two dissenting votes, and I am very optimistic we can get that to 
conference as well.
  So there will be a lot of cooperation on this side of the aisle to 
try to advance the issues the majority leader believes we ought to 
address.

                          ____________________