[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Page S8622]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


[[Page S8622]]
                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 1948. Mr. BINGAMAN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, to provide for 
     comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes; 
     which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1949. Mr. BINGAMAN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1950. Mr. ALEXANDER submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1951. Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. Grassley) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1952. Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. Grassley) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1953. Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. Graham) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1954. Mr. CONRAD submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1955. Mr. SESSIONS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1956. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1957. Mrs. FEINSTEIN proposed an amendment to amendment 
     SA 1934 (Division I) proposed by Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy 
     (for himself and Mr. Specter)) to the bill S. 1639, supra.
       SA 1958. Mr. SPECTER proposed an amendment to amendment SA 
     1934 (Division II) proposed by Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy (for 
     himself and Mr. Specter)) to the bill S. 1639, supra.
       SA 1959. Mr. VITTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1960. Mr. ENSIGN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1961. Mr. ENSIGN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1962. Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. Chambliss) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1963. Mr. COLEMAN (for himself and Mr. Carper) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 
     1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1964. Mr. COLEMAN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1965. Mr. STEVENS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1966. Mr. STEVENS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1967. Mr. SANDERS (for himself and Mr. Grassley) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1968. Mr. SANDERS (for himself and Mr. Grassley) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1969. Mr. NELSON of Florida submitted an amendment 
     intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; 
     which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1970. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. 
     Martinez) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
     him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 1971. Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. Gregg) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1972. Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mr. 
     Menendez, and Mrs. Clinton) submitted an amendment intended 
     to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1973. Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Reid) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1974. Mr. THUNE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1975. Mr. COLEMAN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered 
     to lie on the table.
       SA 1976. Mr. MARTINEZ submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1906 submitted by Mr. Chambliss and 
     intended to be proposed to the bill S. 1639, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1977. Mr. ENSIGN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1934 (Division XI) proposed by Mr. 
     Reid (for Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Specter)) to the 
     bill S. 1639, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1978. Mr. KENNEDY proposed an amendment to amendment SA 
     1934 (Division VII) proposed by Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy 
     (for himself and Mr. Specter)) to the bill S. 1639, supra.

                          ____________________