[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 102 (Friday, June 22, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8276-S8277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                        EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, we are going to have a bill come up next 
week, a critically important bill known as the Employee Free Choice 
Act. I confess I come into this debate with strong feelings. I am a 
product of a family where my mother and father, my two brothers, and I 
were all members of labor unions. This was during a period where the 
labor movement created the middle class in America. It was World War 
II's aftermath. All of the returning veterans had an appetite to build 
homes, start families, open schools, and create the kind of middle-
income working families who are the bedrock of America's democracy. The 
organization that helped these Americans move

[[Page S8277]]

forward was the labor movement. Organized labor went into plants and 
factories and offices across America and said: Workers, if you stand 
together, if you bargain together, great things can happen.
  They did. We created health insurance as we know it today, pension 
plans that have provided the kind of security people dream of in 
retirement, good-paying jobs in safe workplaces. The American dream was 
realized. People bought the second car, put the kids through college, 
had enough time for a vacation, and enjoyed the good life in America.
  It is no coincidence that as the strength of America's labor movement 
has declined. So, too, have the wages of working families. Not that 
those working families aren't doing a good job; they are. They are 
producing more goods and services than ever. They are more productive 
than ever, but they are not being paid for their hard work. They are 
not receiving a decent, livable wage so they can work one job and still 
have time with their family. They are not receiving the kind of health 
insurance protection they once received and fewer and fewer are 
receiving.

  Taking a look at the numbers, in Illinois the median hourly wage fell 
in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 by 4.4 percent. Think about that. The 
median wage of people getting up and going to work every day is not 
keeping up with inflation; it is falling behind. Health care benefits 
in Illinois, the share of the population under the age of 65 with 
employer-provided health insurance fell from 71.9 percent in 1999 to 
68.2 percent in 2004. Fewer people had health insurance through their 
employers over a 5-year period. That is the wrong direction. Pensions 
are the same. In my State, 52.6 percent of the people had employer-
provided pensions in the years 1998 to 2000. By 2003 to 2005, the share 
had dropped to under 50 percent.
  I honestly believe if workers can organize, if they can bargain, we 
could have profitable corporations with quality goods and services, 
good employee morale, and employees treated decently. That can happen.
  The Employer Free Choice Act says that we want to give employees who 
want to organize a fighting chance. Some will say during the debate: If 
a majority of the workers in the workplace sign a card and say, I want 
to be part of a union, the process moves forward. Currently, if 30 
percent of the workers sign a card, they move toward an election. Do 
you know how long it takes to have this election? Do you know how long 
it takes for the employees to finally get their chance to vote today as 
to whether they want a union? The Chicago Tribune pointed out in March 
of this year that the average National Labor Relations Board disputed 
election--and so many of them are disputed--takes 802 days to resolve, 
more than 2 years. Just think for a moment: if we said that the 
interminable campaigns we now have for public office would double in 
length--instead of a year from announcing your candidacy to a vote, we 
will make it over 2 years--is it possible voters would lose interest in 
that period of time? Is it possible people could work on their minds 
about prejudices against a candidate or for a candidate during that 
time? Of course it is. We need to make this a reasonable period and a 
reasonable process that comes to the ultimate question: Do a majority 
of the workers at this location want to organize collectively to try to 
represent their best interests and the interests of their family? I 
believe that is only fair.
  Tuesday morning, we will have a vote. I hope my colleagues on both 
sides will take a close look at the legislation. If we give more 
opportunities for workers to express their heartfelt intentions about 
creating a union and they do, what is going to happen in America is as 
positive as what happened after World War II. We are going to see more 
workers in safer workplaces with decent living wages, good health 
insurance, and good pension benefits, and the corporations will still 
make a profit. Instead of giving some CEO $600 million for very little 
performance, they may have to make do with $300 million. I know it is 
going to be tough, but I think they can get by and then take that $300 
million and give it to the workers so they have a chance to enjoy a 
good life without indebtedness and without the worries that come with 
the current situation.
  I hope my colleagues will join me on Tuesday in supporting this 
effort. I hope in joining me, we will see a change in the law and, with 
this change, we will see a dramatic improvement in the economic fate of 
American families.

                          ____________________