[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 86 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[House]
[Page H5913]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FUNDING WAR IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Payne) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Speaker, since Democrats took over Congress, we have
tried to establish a process to responsibly end our involvement in
Iraq. We, like all Americans, have watched in sadness as 3,422 of our
brave soldiers have lost their lives, including 57 of those who came
from the State of New Jersey.
That is why Congressman Pascrell and Congressman Pallone, Congressman
Holt, Congressman Rothman and Congressman Sires and myself voted
against this resolution.
As we said, we have asked the President to have a responsible end to
our involvement, but 3,422 deaths later, the lives of 57 Americans from
New Jersey have been lost. Already we have passed and sent to the
President a plan that would include a timeline for troop withdrawal.
Our best efforts, however, have been consistently met with a veto.
Indeed, President Bush continues to stubbornly, recklessly insist that
his failed Iraqi policy continues without any reasonable compromise.
We, along with the great majority of Americans, strongly disagree with
the President. He has been wrong every step of the way, and it is long
past time to bring U.S. involvement in Iraq to a conclusion.
The Democratic leadership has tried repeatedly to bring finality to
the war. But because of a lack of a veto-proof majority, today they
have relented on key requirements to help bring about the end.
While we understand why the proposal before us was crafted in such a
way, that we believe we must continue to forcibly stand up to the
President.
We voted against spending even more money in Iraq because there were
no timelines or real accountability on an administration that has
proven to be utterly incompetent on the most important issue of our
time.
As late as yesterday at a major address, the President continues to
try to directly implicate Iraq in 9/11. It was Osama bin Laden, al
Qaeda, who made it very clear on that dastardly, cowardly act on
September 11 to our World Trade Center that it was done by al Qaeda,
done by the Saudi who led this and still continues to lead this
terrorist organization.
So why do we continue to try to stretch the reason for going in and
having an attack on Iraq that it was because of 9/11. We know that
there is the continued attempt to connect the two when they are not
connected. Now we hear al Qaeda is strong and doing well in Iraq.
However, before 9/11, there were no al Qaeda operatives in Iraq.
So we have now a country that is no better off, really. More people
die there. We have a world that is really not any safer. Yet, and
still, we have a President who refuses to see the light, continues to
go down a path of destruction. So, for that reason, I am proud of my
colleagues, Pascrell, Pallone, Holt, Rothman, Sires and myself who
stood up and said, enough is enough, the time is now.
____________________