[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 86 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Page S6827]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                  IRAQ

  Mr. BIDEN. Mr. President, the President of the United States has 
recently stated that we are remaining in Iraq in order to defeat al-
Qaida--a summary of a statement he made yesterday. Well, I wish to 
briefly state what I think the facts are.
  Iraq has become a Bush-fulfilling prophecy. Al-Qaida was not there 
before the war, and it is there now. It is a problem, but it is not the 
primary problem. In my view, the President of the United States is 
inadvertently handing al-Qaida a propaganda victory here by vastly 
exaggerating its role in Iraq.
  The sectarian war--the war between Sunnis and Shias, Sunnis and Shias 
killing each other--is the core problem, and our troops are caught in 
the middle of that war. New statistics from Iraq make it absolutely 
clear that sectarian violence is getting worse and now exceeds the 
levels immediately prior to the surging of American forces over a month 
ago.
  The focus of the President of the United States on al-Qaida and Iraq, 
ironically, supports exactly what I have been arguing for. We need to 
dramatically limit the mission of U.S. troops in Iraq, getting them out 
of the middle of this sectarian civil war and refocusing their mission, 
which should be battling al-Qaida from occupying territory in Anbar 
Province and training Iraqi troops. That would require far fewer troops 
and allow us to begin to remove American troops immediately and get the 
vast majority of our combat troops out of Iraq early next year, 
consistent with the Biden-Levin provision that was in the bill the 
President vetoed.
  Our troops cannot end the sectarian war. Mr. President, 500,000 
American troops will not end the sectarian war. What is required is a 
political solution, even as we continue to take on al-Qaida, which is a 
growing but not the primary problem in Iraq.
  The President continues to bank on a farfetched hope. His hope is 
well-intended, but it is farfetched that the Iraqis will rally behind a 
strong democratic central government in Baghdad. But there is no trust 
within the Government in Baghdad. There is no trust of the Government 
in Baghdad by the Iraqi people. And there is no capacity by that 
Government in Baghdad to deliver either services or security.
  Instead, the President should throw his full weight--the full weight 
of his office--behind the solution based upon federalism in Iraq, 
allowing the Iraqis to have control over the fabric of their daily 
lives, helping them bring into reality the Iraqi Constitution, where 
article 1 says: We are a decentralized federal system. We should not 
impose this. We do not need to. It is already in the Iraqi 
Constitution.
  The President should call for a U.N. summit to get the world's major 
powers and Iraq's neighbors to push for a political agreement. It is 
not an answer to put up a straw man and say we remain there because of 
al-Qaida. What is an answer is to call for the permanent five of the 
United Nations to call for a regional conference; make Iraq the world's 
problem. I met with the Security Council permanent four, with us being 
the fifth, in New York on Monday. It is like pushing an open door. They 
are ready to respond to the President's request to do that. This is 
doable. This is necessary. The President should begin to focus on the 
facts, not the fiction of al-Qaida being our rationale for being there.
  I will end where I began. Al-Qaida's presence in Iraq has become a 
Bush-fulfilling prophecy. They were not there before. They are there 
now. But they are not the primary problem. It is the vicious cycle of 
sectarian violence. It must end.

                          ____________________