[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 78 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6007-S6008]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM
Mr. REID. Mr. President, it is clear--we all agree--that the
immigration system is broken and badly in need of a fix. We have 12
million immigrants, some of who live in constant fear. We have
employers facing the quandary each day over who they can hire and who
they cannot hire, while raids regularly disrupt and even shut down
their businesses. Crops can't be harvested. Produce is dying on the
vine because farmers cannot hire enough workers to harvest the crop.
Under the current system, there are no winners but lots of losers.
Next Tuesday, right after our weekly party conferences, the Senate
will have an opportunity to vote on whether to begin debate on the
complex and critical challenge of immigration reform. The bill we
debate and eventually pass will give us a chance to strengthen border
security, put in place an effective and efficient employer verification
system, design a new worker program to take the pressure off the
border, and give those 12 million undocumented immigrants the
opportunity to come out of the shadows and into the light of day.
[[Page S6008]]
Over the past several months, Senators from both sides of the aisle,
Republicans and Democrats, have spent countless hours negotiating a
bipartisan solution to this critical challenge. These Senators have
been bargaining in good faith. I believe they are working hard to reach
a compromise. I hope they can do that. But if they are not able to
reach a new bipartisan agreement, we have an opportunity to move
forward on a previous bipartisan piece of legislation. The bill I
placed on the calendar is the same bill the Senate passed last year
overwhelmingly with 23 Republicans voting in favor of the legislation.
Last year's bill was far from perfect. Many of us had misgivings about
it--this Senator included--but it is a solid, comprehensive package
that will serve as a good start for this year's very important and
vital debate. Several of my colleagues have said we should not move
forward at this time; let's wait.
Over this weekend, there will be negotiations taking place--the rest
of this day, Saturday, Sunday, and I hope Monday--to see if a
compromise can be reached. If we put this off a week, the same thing
would happen. People would be trying to work something out at the last
minute. There has been ample opportunity for people to work out an
arrangement. I have asked publicly and privately that the President be
involved. Members have put so much time and effort into working on an
immigration bill, they certainly should embrace a motion to start
debate.
Those who have threatened a filibuster on the motion to proceed I
hope will reconsider the threat and understand how illogical it would
be not to allow us to proceed. A bill that passed this body last year
with 21 Republicans voting for the legislation now saying they are not
going to proceed does not make sense to me.
Let me be as clear as I can: By moving this bill, I am trying to make
sure negotiations continue. There has been ample time for negotiations
to bear fruit. The purpose of this legislation is to move forward on
comprehensive immigration reform. I want this Congress to accomplish
immigration reform, but we are running out of time to do it. We have
set aside the next 2 weeks to do this. After that, we have 4 weeks, and
then we have the July 4 recess. After that, 4 more weeks, and then we
are into the August recess. There is no more time to do it. Today is
the time. If we don't do it, starting next Tuesday, there will be no
immigration reform this Congress. That would be a real shame.
The House is waiting for us to do this. As everyone knows, the
schedule we have is so crowded. This next 2 weeks, in addition to doing
immigration reform, we have to send a bill to the President for
supplemental appropriations for the ongoing conflict in Iraq, the civil
war in Iraq. We want to try to do our budget. We are going to finish
WRDA. We have an energy bill we have to do. That is keeping in mind all
the procedural hurdles that are always present in the Senate.
A vote to proceed is a vote to open debate, not shut the door on it.
If a new agreement is reached, it can be offered as a substitute
amendment to this bill on the floor at any time. If a new agreement is
not reached, we can legislate the old-fashioned way--taking out what
people do not like and putting in new stuff. We can offer amendments to
the existing bipartisan bill to make it even better than the one we
passed last year. Either path leads to progress that is long overdue.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________