[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 71 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[House]
[Page H4413]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
U.N. RWANDA GENOCIDE EXHIBIT REVISION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) is recognized for the remainder
of the time until midnight.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, yesterday what was supposed to be an
important U.N. exhibit educating the world about the Rwandan genocide
was turned into a farce thanks to the actions of the Turkish
Government. Three weeks ago, when the Rwanda genocide exhibit was
originally set to open, the Turkish Government did what the Turkish
Government often does, denied historical facts and objected to the
exhibit because it objected to Armenian genocide as an example of
genocide.
It was bad enough that this important U.N. exhibit documenting the
Rwanda genocide was delayed by 3 weeks because Turkey continued to deny
the past, but I was appalled when the exhibit was opened yesterday at
the U.N. with one major revision.
Gone was the citing of the systematic killing of 1.5 millions
Armenians as genocide. Instead it was referred to as a mass killing in
order to appease the Turkish Government. No serious historical dispute
exists about the Armenian genocide. Sadly, an intensive and well-
financed effort by the Turkish Government has succeeded in preventing
the United States, and now the U.N., from any formal recognition of the
Armenian genocide.
This is the warped Turkish version of history, and it's simply not
acceptable. The Turkish objection to this exhibit is the latest example
of their genocide denial. It's absolutely ludicrous that an exhibit
dedicated to the education and prevention of genocide would include
Armenia as an example, use the definition of the term ``genocide,'' but
not use the word ``genocide'' to describe the events.
How, exactly, are you educating the public about genocide when you
refuse to call the first genocide of the 20th century by its name? The
word ``genocide'' was actually created as a way to describe the
barbaric crimes inflicted against the Armenians between 1915 and 1923,
but now the word cannot be used in an exhibit at the U.N. This is
utterly ridiculous.
Would you ever have an exhibit on Christianity without mentioning the
birth of Christ? The same type of absurdity has been used by President
Bush during his annual statement commemorating the anniversary of the
Armenian genocide. Year after year the Bush administration continues to
play word games by not calling evil by its proper name.
If I could just end by saying, I don't think that the U.N. response
to genocides should be denigrated to a level acceptable to the Turkish
Government. It's about time that the Bush administration started
dictating a policy for Americans, not for a foreign government like
Turkey. This lack of honesty is simply not acceptable.
Turkey should be condemned for its policy of denying the Armenian
genocide. As a global community we must collectively stand for
historical truth and properly recognize the worst humanitarian crimes
we have seen.
____________________