[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 61 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H3448-H3449]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 2015
200TH SPECIAL ORDER ON THE WAR IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today for the 200th time to express
my
[[Page H3449]]
disgust and dismay with our Nation's policy in Iraq. And I want to
thank Bart Ackeocella, who has helped me with my many, many words
calling on the President of the United States to bring our troops home.
Forty-nine months after this failed Iraq policy was launched, we are
still being told, Be patient. Progress is just around the corner. All
of our sacrifices will somehow be worth it. But all that amounts to
nothing more than desperate spin. And the American people aren't buying
it; neither, apparently, are some top military brass. The
administration can't find someone to take the job of war czar, a job
that would coordinate the military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan.
One of the recruits for the job, retired Marine General Jack Sheehan,
told The Washington Post last week that he would rather spare himself
the ulcer, saying of the Bush administration, ``The very fundamental
issue is they don't know where the hell they're going.''
How can the administration possibly say that Iraq is on the road to
freedom and stability when a bomb goes off inside the Green Zone and
kills members of the elected Parliament? If it's not safe inside the
fortress of the Green Zone, just imagine what it is like in the streets
of Baghdad.
How can the administration say progress is being made when the
Associated Press reports that dozens of Iraqi police officers were
demonstrating outside their Baghdad station chanting, ``No, no to
America. Get out, occupiers.'' And now American soldiers can look
forward to a few more months of trying valiantly, but in vain, to carry
out this misguided mission, as the Pentagon has announced that
soldiers' 1-year tours will be extended to 15 months.
I ask my colleagues who gave the President the authority to invade
Iraq 4\1/2\ years ago if they weren't surprised that they voted for an
occupation with no apparent end in sight. They absolutely didn't intend
for our troops to be caught in the middle of a civil war that our very
presence as occupiers has inspired. Four and a half years later, over
3,300 Americans who will never make it home to their families, and all
at the cost of more than $375 billion to stop Saddam Hussein from using
weapons of mass destruction that he didn't have.
This week, Americans sent their 2006 tax returns to the IRS, trusting
that our government will send that money back to us in the form of
services, benefits, stability and security. So what do we tell them?
What do we tell the American people about the staggering costs they are
being asked to assume for the occupation of Iraq? Can anyone possibly
argue that we have somehow gotten a return on this reckless investment?
The National Priorities Project has broken down the Iraq financial
burden, assuming a total of $456 billion once the latest supplemental
is signed by the President. Here is what it boils down to: $4,100 for
every American household; $1,500 for every man, woman and child; $275
million a day; $11 million every hour. Look what we could do with that
kind of money: $928 million, 3 days in Iraq is enough to build 100
schools or 5,400 affordable housing units, or provide health care for
144,000 children for the length of the Iraq war.
And if national security is what you want to redirect the money
toward, we could have used Iraq appropriations for more secure posts,
for energy independence initiatives, for nuclear nonproliferation
programs, for debt relief in the underprivileged areas of the world. We
could have invested in real national security.
Mr. Speaker, we have sacrificed more than enough in lives, in
treasure, in national stature and credibility for a mistaken
ideological pipe dream.
It is time for our leaders to hear the frustration of the American
people, frustration with this shameful, wasteful, futile policy. It is
time to end this occupation. It is time to bring our troops home.
____________________