[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 55 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H3366-H3371]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                               AMENDMENTS

  Under clause 8 of rule XVIII, proposed amendments were submitted as 
follows:

                               H.R. 1495

                        Offered by: Mr. Oberstar

       Amendment No. 1: In section 1001(21) of the bill, add at 
     the end the following:

       (C) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
     repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the Houma 
     Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal 
     Waterway floodgate features that provide for inland waterway 
     transportation shall be a Federal responsibility in 
     accordance with section 102 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212).

       In section 1001 of the bill, after paragraph (41) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (42) Riverside oxbow, texas.--The project for environmental 
     restoration, Riverside Oxbow, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers, dated May 29, 2003, at a total cost of 
     $27,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,210,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,900,000.

       In section 1002(b) of the bill, after paragraph (4) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The Secretary 
     shall review the locally prepared plan for the project for 
     flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in 
     subsection (a) and, if the Secretary determines that the plan 
     meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of 
     Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may 
     use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide 
     credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
     interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
     project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
     to the project.

       In section 1003 of the bill, before paragraph (1) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for emergency 
     streambank protection, Aliso Creek, California.

       In section 1006(a) of the bill, after paragraph (2) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (3) Aliso creek, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Aliso Creek, California.

       In section 1006(a) of the bill, after paragraph (15) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (16) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
     watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.

       In section 1006 of the bill, strike subsection (b) (and 
     strike the subsection designation and heading for subsection 
     (a)).

       In section 2015(a)(1)(B) of the bill, after ``Guam,'' 
     insert ``the State of Hawaii,''.

       In section 2039(a) of the bill, insert before ``the 
     Secretary shall include'' the following: ``and for the 
     project for navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana, 
     being conducted pursuant to the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1995 (Public Law 103-316),''.

       At the end of title II of the bill, add the following (and 
     conform the table of contents accordingly):

     SEC. 2041. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, 
     United States Code, the Secretary is authorized to provide 
     assistance through contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
     grants to--
       (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, for 
     establishment and operation of the Southeastern Water 
     Resources Institute to study sustainable development and 
     utilization of water resources in the southeastern United 
     States;
       (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, for the 
     Great Rivers National Research and Education Center 
     (including facilities that have been or will be constructed 
     at one or more locations in the vicinity of the confluence of 
     the Illinois River, the Missouri River, and the Mississippi 
     River), a collaborative effort of Lewis and Clark Community 
     College, the University of Illinois, the Illinois Department 
     of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, and other 
     entities, for the study of river ecology, developing 
     watershed and river management strategies, and educating 
     students and the public on river issues; and
       (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support and 
     operation of the International Center for Decision and Risk 
     Analysis to study risk analysis and control methods for 
     transboundary water resources management in the southwestern 
     United States and other international water resources 
     management problems.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
     to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection 
     (a)(1) $5,000,000, to carry out subsection (a)(2) $5,000,000, 
     and to carry out subsection (a)(3) $5,000,000. Such sums 
     shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 2042. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

       Section 3(c) of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 
     25 Stat. 423), is amended--
       (1) in paragraph (7)(B) by adding at the end the following: 
     ``This subparagraph shall not apply to the Federal hopper 
     dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of Engineers.''; 
     and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(9) Ready reserve for the hopper dredge mcfarland.--The 
     Secretary shall place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland of 
     the Corps of Engineers in ready reserve status not later than 
     October 1, 2008.''.

       Strike section 3020 of the bill and insert the following:

     SEC. 3020. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide credit to the 
     Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, in the amount of 
     $20,503,000, for the non-reimbursed Federal share of costs 
     incurred by the Agency in connection the project for flood 
     control and recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, 
     California (Natomas Levee features), authorized by section 
     9159 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 
     (106 Stat. 1944).
       (b) Allocation of Credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
     amount to be credited under subsection (a) toward the non-
     Federal share of such projects as are requested by the 
     Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

       In section 3023 of the bill, strike ``a study for the 
     reallocation of water storage'' and insert ``a study of water 
     conservation and water quality''.

       In section 3079(c) of the bill, strike ``$5,000,000'' and 
     insert ``$7,000,000''.

       After section 3087 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 3088. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

       The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
     reduction, authorized by section 101(b)(21) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     at a total cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $7,582,000.

       Strike section 3110 of the bill (and redesignate subsequent 
     sections, and conform the table of contents, accordingly).

       After section 3113 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 3114. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is 
     amended to read as follows:
       ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
       ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Bluestone 
     Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, authorized by section 
     4 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as 
     defined in the Evaluation Report of the District Engineer 
     dated December 1996, to prohibit the release of drift and 
     debris into waters downstream of the project, except for that 
     organic matter necessary to maintain and enhance the 
     biological resources of such waters and such nonobtrusive 
     items of debris as may not be economically feasible to 
     prevent being released through such project, including 
     measures to prevent the accumulation of drift and debris at 
     the project, the collection and removal of drift and debris 
     on the segment of the New River upstream of the project, and 
     the removal (through use of temporary or permanent systems) 
     and disposal of accumulated drift and debris at Bluestone 
     Dam.
       ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the 
     downstream cleanup under the plan referred to in paragraph 
     (1), the Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement 
     with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection 
     for the department to carry out the cleanup, including 
     contracting and procurement services, contract administration 
     and management, transportation and disposal of collected 
     materials, and disposal fees.
       ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide the 
     department up to $150,000 from funds previously appropriated 
     for this purpose for the Federal share of the costs of the 
     initial cleanup under the plan.''.

       In section 3119(a) of the bill, redesignate paragraph (3) 
     as paragraph (4) and insert after paragraph (2) the 
     following:

       (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and 
     Channels, Maryland and Virginia, authorized by section 101 of 
     the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818).

       In section 3121(a) of the bill, after paragraph (3) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
     navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of 
     June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), consisting of a 14-foot

[[Page H3367]]

     channel located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with 
     coordinates N9977.37, E340290.02, thence running easterly 
     about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N99978.49, 
     E340490.02, thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to a 
     point with coordinates N100116.49, E340289.25, thence running 
     westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates 
     N100115.37, E340289.25, thence running southerly about 138.00 
     feet to the point of origin.

       In section 3123 of the bill, after subsection (a) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent subsections 
     accordingly):

       (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
       (1) Release of reversionary interest.--Any reversionary 
     interest relating to public parks and recreation on the land 
     conveyed by the Secretary to the State of Oklahoma at Lake 
     Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
     sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'', approved 
     June 16, 1953 (67 Stat. 63), is terminated as of the date of 
     enactment of this Act.
       (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after 
     the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
     execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, 
     an amended deed, or another appropriate instrument to release 
     each reversionary interest described in subsection (a).
       (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--Release of a 
     reversionary interest in accordance with this section shall 
     not be construed to affect any other right excepted or 
     reserved for the United States in a deed of conveyance made 
     pursuant to such Act of June 16, 1953.

       After section 4010 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 4011. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for streambank 
     protection and environmental restoration along Aliso Creek, 
     California.

       Strike section 4038 of the bill (and redesignate subsequent 
     sections, and conform the table of contents, accordingly).

       Strike section 4079 of the bill (and redesignate subsequent 
     sections, and conform the table of contents, accordingly).

       In section 5001(a) of the bill, after paragraph (1) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (2) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.

       In section 5002(d) of the bill, before paragraph (1) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.

       In section 5002(d) of the bill, after paragraph (14) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (15) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.

       In section 5003(a)(2) of the bill, strike ``Saginaw'' and 
     insert ``Flint''.

       In section 5007 of the bill, before paragraph (1) insert 
     the following (and redesignate subsequent paragraphs 
     accordingly):

       (1) Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida.
       (2) Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida.
       (3) St. Johns County shore protection project, Florida.

       After section 5015 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly)

     SEC. 5016. GREAT LAKES PILOT PROJECT.

       Using available funds, the Secretary, in coordination with 
     the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
     Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Director of the United 
     States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Director of the 
     Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, shall carry out a 
     pilot project, on an emergency basis, to control and prevent 
     further spreading of viral hemorrhagic septicemia in the 
     Great Lakes and their connecting channels.

     SEC. 5017. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
     contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
     Corporation under subsection (b), to carry out projects for 
     operations, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation, 
     including associated maintenance dredging, of the Eisenhower 
     and Snell lock facilities and related navigational 
     infrastructure for the Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost 
     of $134,650,000.
       (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
     funds from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation 
     to carry out projects under this section. Such funds may 
     include amounts made available to the Corporation from the 
     Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and the general fund of the 
     Treasury of the United States pursuant to section 210 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238).

       After section 5023 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5024. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.

       (a) Capital Improvements.--Using funds provided in advance 
     by wholesale customers of the Aqueduct and deposited in 
     accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary may make such 
     capital improvements at the Washington Aqueduct as are 
     necessary to comply with the permit for the Aqueduct issued 
     under section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
     (33 U.S.C. 1342).
       (b) Deposit of Funds in Separate Account.--Funds provided 
     by each wholesale customer of the Aqueduct for capital 
     improvements described in subsection (a) shall be deposited 
     into a separate account in the United States Treasury and 
     shall remain available without further appropriation until 
     expended.
       (c) Investment of Funds.--
       (1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary, the 
     Secretary of the Treasury shall invest such portions of the 
     accounts referred to in subsection (b) as are not, in the 
     judgment of the Secretary, immediately needed to make 
     required disbursements on any obligations made in accordance 
     with subsection (a).
       (2) Investment in public debt securities.--The Secretary of 
     the Treasury shall invest funds deposited under subsection 
     (b) in public debt securities suitable to the needs of the 
     accounts referred to in subsection (b), as determined by the 
     Secretary, and bearing interest at a rate determined by the 
     Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration current 
     market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the 
     United States of comparable maturity.
       (3) Interest.--Interest earned on investments of each 
     account referred to in subsection (b) shall be credited to 
     that account and shall be available, without further 
     appropriation, for disbursement by the Secretary to the 
     wholesale customer that provided the funds, at such times and 
     in a manner that is agreed upon by the Secretary and the 
     wholesale customer.

       Strike section 5029 of the bill and insert the following:

     SEC. 5029. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
     planning, design, and construction assistance to the non-
     Federal interest for the construction of a barge landing 
     facility on Fire Island, Alaska.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

       After section 5046 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
       (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: ``and 
     wastewater''; and
       (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting 
     ``$24,500,000''.

       After section 5056 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5057. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.

       (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In 
     this section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida 
     Region'' means Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman 
     County (east of the St. Johns River), Seminole County, 
     Volusia County, the towns of Winter Park, Maitland, and 
     Palatka, Florida.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in the East Central and 
     Northeast Florida Region, including projects for wastewater 
     treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
     facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water 
     resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each partnership agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
     provided in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
     costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable cost of design work on a 
     project completed by the non-Federal interest before entering 
     into a partnership agreement with the Secretary for such 
     project.

[[Page H3368]]

       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
     percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 5058. LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

       The Secretary may assist local interests with planning, 
     design, and construction of facilities at the Lake Lanier 
     Olympic Center, Georgia, at a total cost of $5,300,000.

       After section 5062 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5063. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.

       (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. 
     Clair, Monroe, Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, 
     Alexander, Pulaski, and Williamson, Illinois.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in Southwest Illinois.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in Southwest Illinois, 
     including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
     facilities, water supply and related facilities, and surface 
     water resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
     under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each partnership agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable cost of design work on a 
     project completed by the non-Federal interest before entering 
     into a partnership agreement with the Secretary for such 
     project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

       After section 5064 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5065. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for 
     a project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood 
     inundation areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri 
     River.
       (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall 
     include hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall 
     accurately portray the flood hazard areas in the floodplain. 
     The maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and 
     shall be made available to the State of Iowa in an electronic 
     format.
       (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-
     Federal interests for the project shall work with the 
     Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure 
     the validity of the maps developed under the project for 
     flood insurance purposes.
       (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
     Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements 
     with the non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of 
     project costs.
       (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be 50 percent.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

       In section 5065 of the bill, before ``and, if'' insert the 
     following: ``authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act 
     of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217)''.

       Strike section 5070 of the bill (and redesignate subsequent 
     sections, and conform the table of contents, accordingly).

       After section 5070 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5071. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN 
                   REGION, LOUISIANA.

       (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region 
     Defined.--In this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin 
     and Amite River Basin Region'' means the following parishes 
     and municipalities in the State of Louisiana: Ascension, East 
     Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, Iberville, Livingston, Pointe 
     Coupee, St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and West Feliciana.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin 
     Region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in the East Atchafalaya 
     Basin and Amite River Basin Region, including projects for 
     wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
     related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface 
     water resource protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
     entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
     following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each partnership agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be 
     provided in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
     costs.

[[Page H3369]]

       (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable cost of design work on a 
     project completed by the non-Federal interest before entering 
     into a partnership agreement with the Secretary for such 
     project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
     percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

       After section 5098 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5099. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

       Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1992 (113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$2,000,000''.

       After section 5104 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5105. EAST TENNESSEE.

       (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``East Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, 
     Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, and Sevier, Tennessee.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in East Tennessee.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in East Tennessee, 
     including projects for wastewater treatment and related 
     facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
     under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project cost 
     under each partnership agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable cost of design work on a 
     project completed by the non-Federal interest before entering 
     into a partnership agreement with the Secretary for such 
     project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project cost.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project cost (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
     project cost.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project undertaken under this section, a non-Federal 
     interest may include a nonprofit entity with the consent of 
     the affected local government.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

       After section 5110 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5111. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.

       (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and 
     the municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, 
     Hutchins, Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and 
     Ferris, Texas.
       (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish 
     a program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
     interests in the Dallas County region.
       (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may 
     be in the form of design and construction assistance for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure and resource 
     protection and development projects in the Dallas County 
     region, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
     related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
     environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
     protection and development.
       (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance for a project under this section only if the 
     project is publicly owned.
       (e) Partnership Agreements.--
       (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership 
     agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design 
     and construction of the project to be carried out with the 
     assistance.
       (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
     under this subsection shall provide for the following:
       (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
     with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
     or resource protection and development plan, including 
     appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
       (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
     such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
     ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by 
     the non-Federal interest.
       (3) Cost sharing.--
       (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
     under each partnership agreement entered into under this 
     subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in 
     the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
       (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests shall 
     receive credit for the reasonable cost of design work on a 
     project completed by the non-Federal interest before entering 
     into a partnership agreement with the Secretary for such 
     project.
       (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
     of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of 
     an agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in 
     providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
       (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
     Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share 
     of project costs (including all reasonable costs associated 
     with obtaining permits necessary for the construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the project on publicly owned 
     or controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
     percent of total project costs.
       (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
     assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
       (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing 
     in this section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the 
     applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that 
     would otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with 
     assistance provided under this section.
       (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for 
     any project

[[Page H3370]]

     undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may 
     include a nonprofit entity.
       (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by 
     the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer 
     projects under this section at Federal expense.
       (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

       After section 5112 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 5113. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

       (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
     environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, 
     Arlington, Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the report entitled 
     ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated March 30, 
     2006, at a total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $28,000,000, if the Secretary determines that the project 
     is feasible.
       (b) Non-Federal Share.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind 
     services or materials.
       (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
     planning, design, and construction work carried out by the 
     non-Federal interest for implementation of the project, if 
     the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
     project.
       (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the 
     project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest 
     to participate in the financing of the project in accordance 
     with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (100 Stat. 4184).
       (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) 
     is repealed.

       In section 5121 of the bill, strike ``and'' at the end of 
     paragraph (1)(B), redesignate paragraph (2) as paragraph (3), 
     and insert after paragraph (1) the following:

       (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000''; and

       After section 5123 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     conform the table of contents accordingly):

     SEC. 5124. WAGE SURVEYS.

       Employees of the United States Army Corps of Engineers who 
     are paid wages determined under the last undesignated 
     paragraph under the heading ``Administrative Provisions'' of 
     chapter V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1982 (5 
     U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 Stat. 832) shall be allowed, through 
     appropriate employee organization representatives, to 
     participate in wage surveys under such paragraph to the same 
     extent as are prevailing rate employees under subsection 
     (c)(2) of section 5343 of title 5, United States Code. 
     Nothing in such section 5343 shall be considered to affect 
     which agencies are to be surveyed under such paragraph.

     SEC. 5125. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

       Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335-337; 114 Stat. 2763A-220-
     221) is amended--
       (1) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating to 
     Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the following:
       ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection 
     systems, and stormwater system improvements, Charleston, 
     South Carolina.'';
       (2) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to Placer 
     and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph (73);
       (3) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to Lassen, 
     Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, as 
     paragraph (74);
       (4) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
     Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
       ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
     infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.'';
       (5) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to St. 
     Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76); and
       (6) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(77) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
       ``(78) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
       ``(79) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
     $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within 
     the East Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda 
     and Contra Costa Counties, California.
       ``(80) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
     $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Arcadia, 
     Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, including $13,000,000 
     for stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
       ``(81) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
     california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and 
     distribution, Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency, 
     California.
       ``(82) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
     $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water quality 
     in the Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial County, 
     California.
       ``(83) Contra costa water district, california.--
     $23,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure for the 
     Contra Costa Water District, California.
       ``(84) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
     california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve 
     the East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, 
     California.
       ``(85) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater 
     disinfection facility and polishing system, to improve water 
     quality in the vicinity of Calexico, California, on the 
     southern New River, Imperial County, California.
       ``(86) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond Bar, La 
     Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, 
     California.
       ``(87) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure to improve water quality in the New River, 
     California.
       ``(88) Orange county, california.--$15,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, Brea, 
     La Habra, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba 
     Linda, Orange County, California.
       ``(89) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 for 
     wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino and Chino 
     Hills, San Bernardino County, California.
       ``(90) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for an 
     advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa Clara 
     County, California.
       ``(91) Southern los angeles county, california.--
     $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
     groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles 
     County, California.
       ``(92) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water 
     treatment and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, 
     California.
       ``(93) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
     california.--$375,000 to improve water quality, and remove 
     nonnative aquatic species from the Sweetwater Reservoir, San 
     Diego County, California.
       ``(94) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
     wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, 
     California.
       ``(95) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--
     $1,000,000 for water and wastewater related infrastructure 
     for the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma and La Plata 
     Counties, Colorado.
       ``(96) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers counties, 
     colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
     Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado.
       ``(97) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--$34,000,000 
     for water transmission infrastructure, Pueblo and Otero 
     Counties, Colorado.
       ``(98) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
     water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
       ``(99) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
     maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and 
     resource protection and development to enhance water quality 
     and living resources in the Anacostia River watershed, 
     District of Columbia and Maryland.
       ``(100) Washington, district of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
     implementation of a combined sewer overflow long-term control 
     plan, Washington, District of Columbia.
       ``(101) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
       ``(102) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, florida.--
     $20,000,000 for water supply interconnectivity 
     infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and Collier Counties, 
     Florida.
       ``(103) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity of 
     the Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
       ``(104) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for wastewater 
     related infrastructure, including septic tank replacements, 
     Jacksonville, Florida.
       ``(105) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida.
       ``(106) South seminole and north orange county, florida.--
     $30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the South 
     Seminole and North Orange Wastewater Transmission Authority, 
     Florida.
       ``(107) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine mountain 
     (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, georgia.--
     $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
     Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Mountain (Harris 
     County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, Georgia.
       ``(108) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--
     $7,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
     Meriwether and Spalding Counties, Georgia.
       ``(109) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--$1,700,000 
     for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon and Butlerville, 
     Indiana.
       ``(110) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 for 
     water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington County, 
     Indiana.
       ``(111) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water related 
     infrastructure and resource protection and development, 
     Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, Fayette, Mercer, 
     Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln, Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, 
     Clark, Montgomery, and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky.

[[Page H3371]]

       ``(112) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
     sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
       ``(113) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
       ``(114) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
     minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the 
     Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the 
     cities of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan and 
     Great Scott Townships, Minnesota.
       ``(115) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
       ``(116) City of biloxi, city of gulfport, and harrison 
     county, mississippi.--$15,000,000 for water and wastewater 
     related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, city of Gulfport, and 
     Harrison County, Mississippi.
       ``(117) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
       ``(118) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
       ``(119) Henderson, nevada.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
       ``(120) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
       ``(121) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
     supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
     Ellicottville, New York.
       ``(122) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
     infrastructure, Town of Sennett, New York.
       ``(123) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
     water, and wastewater infrastructure in Wellsville, New York.
       ``(124) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, including water mains, pump 
     stations, and water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, 
     New York.
       ``(125) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(126) Charlotte, north carolina.--$11,000,000 for phase 
     II of the Briar Creek wastewater project, Charlotte, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(127) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Richmond County, North 
     Carolina.
       ``(128) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
       ``(129) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 for 
     water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern Mariana 
     Islands.
       ``(130) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
       ``(131) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
       ``(132) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
       ``(133) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, 
     Oregon.
       ``(134) Borough of stockerton, borough of tatamy, and 
     palmer township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater 
     control measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the 
     vicinity of the Borough of Stockerton, the Borough of Tatamy, 
     and Palmer Township, Pennsylvania.
       ``(135) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(136) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for 
     stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
     Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
       ``(137) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales Borough, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(138) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
       ``(139) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
     wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
     Pennsylvania.
       ``(140) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
       ``(141) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for water 
     and wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth of Puerto 
     Rico.
       ``(142) Charleston, south carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
     stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
     Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, 
     South Carolina.
       ``(143) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south carolina.--
     $25,000,000 for a project for water storage and water supply 
     infrastructure on Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South 
     Carolina.
       ``(144) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
     environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, 
     Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
       ``(145) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
     environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
     Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
       ``(146) Surfside, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
     environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
     improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
       ``(147) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
       ``(148) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, 
     Grimes, Hill, Hood, Johnson, Madison, McLennan, Limestone, 
     Robertson, and Somervell Counties, Texas.
       ``(149) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water 
     related infrastructure and resource protection, including 
     stormwater management, and development, El Paso County, 
     Texas.
       ``(150) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
       ``(151) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
     $10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, 
     and Uintah Counties, Utah.
       ``(152) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, 
     Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, 
     Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, 
     Gilmer, Brooke, Ritchie Counties, West Virginia.
       ``(153) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla 
     wastewater treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte 
     Amalie wastewater treatment plant, United States Virgin 
     Islands.
       ``(154) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
     counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
     $25,000,000 for water supply infrastructure for the Cheyenne 
     River Sioux Reservation in Dewey and Ziebach Counties, and 
     for communities in Perkins and Meade Counties, South 
     Dakota.''.

       After section 6002 of the bill, insert the following (and 
     redesignate subsequent sections, and conform the table of 
     contents, accordingly):

     SEC. 6003. INITIAL PROJECTS.

       Section 601(b)(2)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 2000 (114 Stat. 2682) is amended--
       (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking ``at a 
     total cost of $1,100,918,000'' and all that follows before 
     the colon;
       (2) in clause (iv)--
       (A) by striking ``$100,335,000'' and inserting 
     ``$162,630,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``$50,167,500'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``$81,315,000'';
       (3) in clause (v)--
       (A) by striking ``$124,837,000'' and inserting 
     ``$385,010,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``$62,418,500'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``$192,505,000''; and
       (4) in clause (vi)--
       (A) by striking ``$89,146,000'' and inserting 
     ``$199,340,000''; and
       (B) by striking ``$44,573,000'' each place it appears and 
     inserting ``$99,670,000''.

       In section 7002(e)(3) of the bill, strike subparagraph (D) 
     and insert the following:

       (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled 
     ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane Protection--
     Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable 
     Coast''.

       At the end of section 7006(a) of the bill, insert the 
     following:

       (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee act.--A 
     working group established under this subsection shall not be 
     considered to be an advisory committee under the Federal 
     Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).

       In section 7007(b) of the bill, strike ``this section'' and 
     insert ``this title''.

       In section 7013 of the bill, strike subsection (a) and 
     insert the following:

       (a) Deauthorization.--
       (1) In general.--The navigation channel portion of the 
     project for navigation, Mississippi River-Gulf outlet, 
     authorized by the Act entitled, ``An Act to authorize 
     construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet'', approved 
     March 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 65), as modified by section 844 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177), 
     and further modified by section 326 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), which extends from 
     the Gulf of Mexico to mile 60 at the southern bank of the 
     Gulf Intracoastal Waterway is not authorized.
       (2) Scope.--Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to modify 
     or deauthorize the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Replacement 
     Project, authorized by the Act referred to in paragraph (1).

       In section 8004(c) of the bill, strike ``build upon'' and 
     insert ``adopt and continue''.