[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 47 (Monday, March 19, 2007)]
[House]
[Page H2634]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ARTHUR V. WATKINS DAM ENLARGEMENT ACT
Mr. GRIJALVA. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 839) to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the
feasibility of enlarging the Arthur V. Watkins Dam Weber Basin Project,
Utah, to provide additional water for the Weber Basin Project to
fulfill the purposes for which that project was authorized.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 839
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Arthur V. Watkins Dam
Enlargement Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Arthur V. Watkins Dam is a feature of the Weber Basin
Project, which was authorized by law on August 29, 1949.
(2) Increasing the height of Arthur V. Watkins Dam and
construction of pertinent facilities may provide additional
storage capacity for the development of additional water
supply for the Weber Basin Project for uses of municipal and
industrial water supply, flood control, fish and wildlife,
and recreation.
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDY.
The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of
Reclamation, is authorized to conduct a feasibility study on
raising the height of Arthur V. Watkins Dam for the
development of additional storage to meet water supply needs
within the Weber Basin Project area and the Wasatch Front.
The feasibility study shall include such environmental
evaluation as required under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and a cost
allocation as required under the Reclamation Project Act of
1939 (43 U.S.C. 485 et seq.).
SEC. 4. COST SHARES.
(a) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the
study authorized in section 3 shall not exceed 50 percent of
the total cost of the study.
(b) In-Kind Contributions.--The Secretary shall accept, as
appropriate, in-kind contributions of goods or services from
the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District. Such goods and
services accepted under this section shall be counted as part
of the non-Federal cost share for the study.
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary
$1,000,000 for the Federal cost share of the study authorized
in section 3.
SEC. 6. SUNSET.
The authority of the Secretary to carry out any provisions
of this Act shall terminate 10 years after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Arizona (Mr. Grijalva) and the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Bishop) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arizona.
General Leave
Mr. GRIJALVA. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include
extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Arizona?
There was no objection.
Mr. GRIJALVA. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
H.R. 839, introduced by our colleague, Representative Rob Bishop of
Utah, would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the
feasibility of enlarging the Arthur V. Watkins Dam. The dam is one of
the main features of the Bureau of Reclamation's Weber Basin Project
located along the shore of the Great Salt Lake near Ogden, Utah.
{time} 1445
Recent drought and a growing population in Utah have highlighted
water supply needs in the area. The feasibility study authorized by
this legislation will help local water agencies and the Bureau of
Reclamation to decide whether we should consider raising the dam to
improve water storage capacity.
In the 109th Congress, the Subcommittee on Water and Power held
hearings on similar legislation. That legislation was subsequently
reported by the committee and passed by the House.
We have no objection to this legislation and urge its passage.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. BISHOP of Utah. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
I rise in support of H.R. 839. The Bureau of Reclamation's Weber
Basin Project, which is located in northern Utah only a short distance
from the historic Brigham City, stores and delivers water from the
Weber River into its tributaries.
The Arthur V. Watkins Dam, which is part of the Weber Basin Project,
is part of an off-stream reservoir on the northeastern edge of the
Great Salt Lake. It is formed by a roughly rectangular perimeter dam
that is about 14.5 miles long. Water from the Weber River near its
outlet to the Great Salt Lake is diverted into the reservoir by the
Willard Canal and pumped from the reservoir by that same canal for
multiple purposes. In addition to providing water supply, the reservoir
is a popular recreation facility.
Recent drought and a growing population of Utah have highlighted the
need for additional water storage. As a result, the Weber Basin Water
Conservancy District, a water user which manages the Arthur V. Watkins
Dam and Reservoir, desires the Bureau of Reclamation's assistance in
determining the feasibility of adding water storage capacity to the
reservoir.
H.R. 839 authorizes such assistance. This bill passed in the 109th
Congress by voice vote. I again ask for your support.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. GRIJALVA. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of our time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Grijalva) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 839.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mr. GRIJALVA. Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX and the
Chair's prior announcement, further proceedings on this question will
be postponed.
____________________