[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 40 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2889-S2890]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AMERICA COMPETES ACT OF 2007
Mr. REID. Mr. President, along with the Republican leader, Senator
McConnell, I have introduced the America COMPETES, Creating
Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology,
Education, and Science, Act of 2007.
This legislation is the result of a truly bipartisan effort. Two
years ago, Senators Bingaman and Alexander asked the National Academies
to make recommendations on the steps we should take as a nation to
maintain our competitive advantage. The result was the Augustine
Report, ``Rising Above the Gathering Storm,'' which provided four
primary recommendations:
First, the United States needs to dramatically improve K-12 science
and mathematics education in order to increase our talent pool. Second,
we must sustain and strengthen our Nation's traditional commitment to
long-term basic research. Third, we must make the United States the
most attractive place to study and perform research. And fourth, we
need to provide incentives for innovation and long-term investment so
that the United States is the premier place to innovate.
The report warned that the Nation's traditional advantages ``are
eroding at a time when many other nations are gathering strength,'' and
that ``decisive action is needed now.''
America has faced this challenge before.
In 1957, when the Soviets launched Sputnik, it caused great panic and
concern about our ability to maintain our technological superiority. We
responded to these threats quickly. The following year, Congress passed
the National Defense Education Act, to keep the United States ahead of
the Soviets through increased investment in math and science education.
We trained a whole new generation of engineers and scientists, and
thus ensured our preeminence in technology and innovation for a
generation.
That fact is, Federal investment in the basic sciences and research
has long been a critical component of America's competitive dominance
globally. In fact, some economists have estimated that about half of
the country's economic growth since World War II has been the result of
technological innovation.
Today, however, our position of dominance has been lost. We are
challenged by emerging countries like India and China, where national
investment in basic research and subject areas such as math and science
continues to grow at a far greater pace than here in the United States.
The Augustine panel cited many examples, but some of the statistics
are striking.
Consider that in 2005, more than 600,000 engineers graduated from
institutions of higher education in China, compared to 350,000 in India
and only 70,000 in the United States. China's population is more than
three times that of the United States, yet they graduate more than
eight times the number of engineers.
The report also found that American 12th graders performed below the
international average for 21 countries on general knowledge in math and
science. Another study cited in the report had American 15-year-olds
ranked 24th out of 40 countries on a math assessment. In my home State
of Nevada, the situation is equally alarming, with our students ranked
43rd in the Nation on a 2005 math assessment.
And even though technological giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Intel
are American companies, the report indicates that the United States is
now a net importer of high technology products--a shift from the early
1990s, when we had a $54 billion surplus in high-tech exports.
As other countries become more competitive, it is clear we must
refocus our energies on enhancing the Federal commitment to funding
basic research and education.
We must preserve the competitive edge of the United States in science
[[Page S2890]]
and technology by getting kids motivated to study math and science. To
do this, we need to provide more training for math and science
teachers, increase the number of students taking advanced placement
courses, offer grants to establish high schools that specialize in math
and science, and provide scholarships and fellowships for future
scientists and engineers.
The legislation we are introducing today addresses some of these
concerns. It is, in effect, a downpayment, a modest first step to
ensuring that America retains its competitive edge.
I wish to thank Senators Bingaman and Alexander for authorizing the
Academies Study. This study, along with a number of recent reports and
books--among them, Tom Friedman's ``The World is Flat,'' which I know
that many of my colleagues have read--brought a much-needed sense of
urgency to this issue.
Many of these provisions were included in the Protecting America's
Competitive Edge Act, or PACE, which Senators Bingaman and Domenici
introduced in the last Congress, and I was pleased to cosponsor that
important legislation.
I also want to recognize the hard work of a number of my colleagues,
Senators Inouye, Stevens, Kennedy, Enzi, Lieberman, Ensign, Mikulski,
Hutchison, and Senator Nelson of Florida, who have been instrumental in
crafting this legislation.
The legislation that we are introducing will double the Federal
investment for the National Science Foundation over the next 4 years,
and for the Office of Science at the Department of Energy over the next
decade.
America COMPETES will create a DARPA-modeled research project at the
Department of Energy and increase investment for basic research at NASA
and other science-related Federal agencies.
The bill provides grants to States in order to better align
elementary and secondary school curriculum with the knowledge and
skills needed for the global economy. Nevada is already doing something
similar, with our State P-16 Council.
The legislation will strengthen our math and science teaching
workforce by recruiting and training teachers to teach in high-need
schools.
America COMPETES will expand the important Advanced Placement and
International Baccalaureate, IB, programs by increasing the number of
math, science, and foreign languages AP and IB courses, and preparing
more teachers to teach these challenging courses. This is essential for
States such as Nevada, where only 6 percent of 12th graders took the AP
calculus exam and only 7 percent took an AP science exam.
The bill will help develop an infrastructure for innovation by
establishing a President's Council on Innovation and Competitiveness to
promote innovation and competitiveness.
Also, this legislation will help improve math instruction at the
elementary and middle school level, through Math Now grants.
If signed into law, our bill will do many of the things that the
Augustine Report recommended, but the truth is, in years to come, we
will have even more to do.
Though we make new and significant investments in research, we still
must address our tax structure and make sure that we do as much as
possible to encourage investment in research and development. We should
start by finally making the R&D tax credit permanent.
We must also do more in education. This bill strengthens educational
opportunities in science, technology, engineering, math, and critical
foreign languages, but this is just a first step. For example, we must
take a very hard look at our high schools. As Bill Gates has often
said, our high schools were designed for a 20th century economy and
often do not address the needs of the 21st century workforce.
We should also realize that unless our most basic commitments to
America's students are met--by properly funding title I and No Child
Left Behind and making a college education accessible and affordable--
these efforts alone cannot prepare our students for the global economy.
Mr. President, Senator McConnell and I began the 110th Congress by
promising a new spirit of bipartisanship. Of course we have had our
differences on some issues, but I hope that, in jointly introducing
this important legislation, we send a signal that investing in
America's future is not a partisan issue.
The America COMPETES Act is an important first step in maintaining
this Nation's competitive advantage, and I look forward to working with
my colleagues to ensure that we follow through on the investments we
are making in this legislation.
____________________