[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H1935-H1936]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MESSAGE TO THE PRESIDENT: END THE OCCUPATION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, last week British Prime Minister Tony Blair
announced that more than 1,600 British soldiers would be sent home from
Iraq. By recalling troops from Iraq, the British government has sent a
very clear message that increasing the number of troops is not the
right strategy. In fact, the British government has come to the same
conclusion that many Americans have reached almost 4 years ago. We
should be ending the military occupation of Iraq, not expanding it. We
should be supporting the men and women who have served bravely in Iraq
by sending them home, not sending them back for their fourth or their
fifth tour of duty after only a very few months of spending time with
their families.
The British government's decision to scale back its military
commitment in Iraq should have been another important wake up call to
President Bush. However, the President has continued his course to go
it alone, regardless of the staggering costs to our Nation.
President Bush has drained America's reservoir of goodwill by
ignoring the facts on the ground, the advice of his generals, and the
will of the American public. By stubbornly pursuing the same misguided
policies over and over again, he has left it to Congress to stop him.
Two weeks ago, the House took an important first step by
overwhelmingly passing a bipartisan resolution condemning the
President's decision to send more than 20,000 additional American
soldiers to the front lines. I commend the Democratic leadership, and I
commend my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for having the courage
to stand up to the President and to oppose his escalation. This vote,
however, is only the first step.
Now that the House has stood up to disagree with the President, we
must use this consensus to take on the urgent job of bringing our
troops safely home.
As a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee and a co founder of the
Out of Iraq Caucus, I have introduced a comprehensive and detailed plan
to end the occupation while ensuring that we achieve security and
stability in Iraq. My bill, H.R. 508, the Bring the Troops Home and
Iraq Sovereignty Restoration Act, now has 47 cosponsors.
H.R. 508 will provide for a fully funded withdrawal of U.S. troops
and contractors from Iraq within a 6-month period. During the time of
that 6-month passage, our troops will return home to receive the full
health care benefits they deserve because we owe them, we owe them no
less for their sacrifices. And while they are coming home, we will be
putting those laws into place, ensuring they get their benefits.
Also during that 6-month withdrawal period, our government will
accelerate the training and equipping of Iraqi security forces, and if
requested by the Iraqi government, we will work with the international
community to provide a stabilization force to enhance Iraq's security.
Additionally, my bill would prohibit the establishment of permanent
U.S. bases in Iraq, and we would return control of Iraq's oil resources
to the Iraqi people. The only way to restore stability to Iraq is to
return the country to the Iraqis, and we must work with our allies to
achieve this. But when the Bush administration, in spite of all the
advice to the contrary, decides to escalate the occupation, and the
British government takes the sensible path of withdrawal, they both
can't be right.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot afford to wait for the President to realize
his mistake. Too many brave men and brave women have died and suffered
to continue this occupation. We must stand up, we must demand, we must
bring our troops home. That is how we can protect our troops.
[[Page H1936]]
____________________