[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[House]
[Pages H1924-H1926]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ARTERIAL ROAD
IN ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI
Mr. OBERSTAR. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 1129) to provide for the construction, operation, and
maintenance of an arterial road in St. Louis County, Missouri.
The Clerk read as follows:
H.R. 1129
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROJECT DEFINED.
In this Act, the term ``project'' means only the portion of
St. Louis County, Missouri,
[[Page H1925]]
arterial road 1151 that is deed-restricted property, which
specifically applies to approximately 0.3 acres and 540
lineal feet and is identified as the ``FEMA'' route in the
document entitled ``Lemay Connector Road for Long-Term
Recovery, Recreational Enhancements, & Community, & Economic
Development'', dated June 1, 2006, on file with the St. Louis
County department of highways and traffic.
SEC. 2. APPLICABLITY OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAW.
The St. Louis County arterial road 1151, known as the
``Lemay Connector Road'' in St. Louis City and County,
Missouri, may be constructed, operated, and maintained over
the deed-restricted property described in section 1,
notwithstanding section 404(b)(2) of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5170c) or Public Law 103-211 and any easement or other
similar restriction pursuant to those Federal laws on the
development of property that requires the property be
maintained for open space, recreation, or wetland management.
SEC. 3. NO DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON FLOOD PLAIN.
For the project, St. Louis County, Missouri, shall ensure
that the project is constructed, operated, and maintained in
such a manner that would not cause any future additional
flood damage that would not have occurred without the
project. Prior to constructing the project, St. Louis County
or its assignee must identify and agree to restrict a nearby
parcel of land of equal or greater size to the deed
restricted land used for the project so that such parcel is
maintained for open space, recreation, or wetland management.
SEC. 4. LIABILITY FOR FLOOD DAMAGE.
The Federal Government shall not be liable for future flood
damage that is caused by the project. St. Louis County,
Missouri, or its assignee shall be liable for any future
flood damage that is caused by the project.
SEC. 5. NO FUTURE DISASTER ASSISTANCE.
The deed-restricted property described in section 1 is not
eligible for any future disaster assistance from any other
Federal source.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Petri)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Minnesota.
General Leave
Mr. OBERSTAR. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks
on the bill, H.R. 1129.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Minnesota?
There was no objection.
Mr. OBERSTAR. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the legislation before us would authorize St. Louis
County, Missouri, to build a road over three-tenths of an acre of deed-
restricted property. The road that they would build will lead to a
development project along the Mississippi River adjacent to St. Louis.
In the aftermath of the 1993 Mississippi River flood, which many of
us can vividly remember, and I recall so much part of that tragedy our
then majority leader, Mr. Gephardt, passing sandbags down along the
riverfront to halt the onslaught of the river, it was a very compelling
moment in flood history in America. St. Louis was particularly hard
hit.
FEMA, under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, acquired property,
took it out of development and protected the floodplain from
development for uses that would be inconsistent with the need to
protect the area against flood.
FEMA requires that properties purchased under the Hazard Mitigation
Grant Program be maintained in perpetuity for uses consistent with open
space, recreation or wetlands management. The law generally does not
allow new structures to be built on such property, but exceptions are
permitted under existing law, including projects preapproved in writing
by the director of FEMA. FEMA has promulgated regulations to spell out
those restrictions.
The property which is the subject of this legislation, was not
purchased with hazard mitigation funds, but with Community Development
Block Grant funds. But those funds were subjected to the same FEMA
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program easement restrictions for open space.
All parties tried in the current situation to find an exception in
the historic application of FEMA law and regulation, but the project
didn't fit any of the historic examples or exceptions. So the State and
the county both are seeking a waiver of the easement so that both
entities can proceed with construction of a road that will create
access to a complex development project of housing, retail, commercial
space and open and recreational space.
Now, this project itself is not within nor will it be built anywhere
on restricted property, property restricted by FEMA under the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program funds. And to be sure that there are no escape
clauses or escape hatches, if you will, the bill includes requirements
to ensure that the road authorized to be developed will not increase
the danger of flooding and that the road will not subject the Federal
Government to any additional exposure or liability.
The bill requires the county in which the road will be constructed,
and that is St. Louis County, Missouri, we have one also in Minnesota,
to ensure that the construction, operation and maintenance of the road
will not cause any future additional flood damage that would not have
occurred without the project. It is very important to spell those
conditions out.
The bill also requires the county or its assignee to mitigate the
project by adding to the flood protection area a nearby parcel of land
of equal or greater size to the deed-restricted land used for the road.
Further, the bill provides that the Federal Government shall not be
liable for future flood damage that may be caused by the project and
that the county will be liable for such damage.
The bill also provides that the deed restricted property on which the
road will be built, and only the road, will not be eligible for any
future disaster assistance from any other Federal source.
I think with those very precise, very carefully crafted constraints,
we can and should approve this legislation to allow the other
development to go forward, a development that is not within the hazard
area.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PETRI. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the bill before us, H.R. 1129, introduced by
Representative Russ Carnahan of Missouri, provides for the
construction, operation and maintenance of an arterial road in St.
Louis County, Missouri, over deed-restricted property and requires that
county to restrict a nearby parcel of land for open space, recreation
or wetland management. The bill allows construction of a surface road
across property purchased with Federal funds.
Following the 1993 Midwest floods, this property was purchased for
the purpose of clearing the floodplain of homes to prevent future flood
losses. The bill requires St. Louis County to ensure that this project
will not cause future flood damage. If there is flood damage caused by
this project, the bill assigns liability to St. Louis County. This
property will remain permanently ineligible for Federal disaster
assistance. The Federal interest in reducing Federal disaster costs
remains protected.
This project is not setting precedent. In the past, exceptions have
been made to allow for road and public works development on deed
restricted properties.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. OBERSTAR. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 30 seconds.
Mr. Speaker, I want to express my great appreciation to the gentleman
from Wisconsin and to the staff on the Republican side for their
splendid cooperation throughout the crafting of this legislation. It
took a great deal of time and effort to get to this point and it was a
bipartisan initiative. We very much appreciate their consideration.
Mr. PETRI. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman of our committee, and I
yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. OBERSTAR. I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman
from Missouri (Mr. Carnahan), the author of the legislation, and within
whose district this project and development will occur. I also want to
express my appreciation and perhaps admiration for his persistence in
following through on this very difficult, complex initiative. The
gentleman has certainly worked hard on behalf of his constituency.
Mr. CARNAHAN. Chairman Oberstar, thank you and Ranking Member Mica
and the gentleman from Wisconsin here today for working with me
[[Page H1926]]
to move this important legislation along. Also, special thanks to your
staff and committee staff on both sides that have been helpful in
moving this legislation. On behalf of myself and the citizens the Third
District in Missouri, I want to thank them all.
This bill, H.R. 1129, means a great deal to the congressional
district I represent in Lemay, St. Louis County, Missouri. It will
allow the construction, maintenance and operation of a road to a
community in South St. Louis County hard hit by the great flood of
1993. This Lemay Connector Road, as it is called, is vital to the long-
term recovery of that community. It will bring badly needed jobs and
tax revenues to the area, support the cleanup of brownfields sites, and
create new parks and recreational opportunities.
The transformation taking place in this area is the type communities
dream about, turning environmentally contaminated idle property into
hundreds of millions of dollars in economic development, thousands of
new jobs, and wonderful recreational opportunities alongside a national
treasure, the Mississippi River.
In 1993, Lemay, Missouri, just south of St. Louis, was hard hit by
the flood of 1993. In the aftermath, Community Development Block Grant
funds were used to acquire certain parcels of land which carried with
them FEMA deed restrictions. St. Louis County has since acquired the
land, but deed restrictions still apply.
Years ago, this area was home to businesses providing thousands of
jobs for this community. Unfortunately, by-products heavily polluted
the area, and since the closure of businesses, four specific sites,
including the former National Lead Site, which closed in 1978, the
Carondolet Coke site, which closed in 1992, the Stupp Brothers site,
which closed in 1998, and the National Imaging and Mapping Agency site,
closed in 1994, have since been designated as brownfields. Thankfully,
clean up and redevelopment of the land will come to fruition as the
Lemay connector road is built.
Since 1993, the Federal Government has invested more than $33 million
in South St. Louis City and County region for the purpose of
revitalizing these communities. In addition, the State and local
community have come together to plan the redevelopment of this area.
Plans include new businesses, which will generate thousands of new
jobs, a bandshell, ice skating rink, bowling alley, multi-screen movie
complex, a new county park with soccer and baseball fields. The
proposed Lemay connector road will provide access to all this, the four
abandoned brownfield sites, and complete the link to the Great Rivers
Greenway regional ring of trails.
In 2003, the Missouri Department of Transportation conducted a
federally funded survey with regard to the area and decided it was one
of the top priorities for the region.
{time} 1645
The planned road is authorized by this legislation and has been
identified by means of an environmental assessment as the
environmentally preferred route.
The road is considered safe by the Missouri Department of
Transportation, has been endorsed by its officials, and also the local
police and fire departments, because it will enable city and county to
reduce first responder times. Most importantly, the planned road has
the unwavering support of community leaders.
In addition to the public access benefits already stated, the road
will include dedicated bicycle paths and sidewalks, and provide
improved access to schools, community institutions and parks, and I
want to name a few in the area: Hancock Place School District, Notre
Dame High School, Metropolitan Sewer District, St. Louis Enterprise
Center in South County, Lemay Child and Family Center, Jefferson
Barracks National Cemetery, and a park and planned military history
complex. In addition, park areas include the Black Forest Park, Lemay
Park, and the Great Rivers regional system of interconnected parks and
trails.
The bill costs the Federal Government nothing. The cost of the road
will be incurred by the county in cooperation with local developers.
This legislation has broad bipartisan support in Missouri and here in
the Congress among our congressional delegation, including my Missouri
colleague on the Transportation Committee, Mr. Graves. The legislation
specifically authorizes the Lemay connective road to be built over
deed-restricted parcels of land.
In an attempt to avoid the same disastrous consequences of the flood
of 1993, the bill requires the county to take appropriate flood
mitigation efforts upon constructing the road. It is the intent of
Congress that prior to constructing the road, adjacent or nearby land
of approximately equal size and value of the easement necessary to
build the road, about 0.3 acres, will be designated for open space,
recreational use, or wetlands management.
Finally, consistent with existing law, the Federal Government will
not be liable for any flooding caused by the construction, maintenance
and operation of the road.
My colleagues, this is a good bill that will have remarkably positive
impacts on the Lemay community in Missouri. I urge your support and
passage of H.R. 1129.
I want to conclude by giving special thanks to our St. Louis County
executive, Charlie Dooley, and his staff in St. Louis County, and all
those working with the county for their impressive work on this
project.
I can't wait to travel on the new Lemay connector road, to take a
tour of the newly opened businesses, community center, and take a bike
ride along the Great Rivers Greenway.
Mr. PETRI. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. OBERSTAR. Mr. Speaker, I certainly look forward to doing a bike
ride along that area, if it is a long enough road, and look forward to
the project moving forward with the construction of this road and the
development and the investment and the job creation that the gentleman
has cited.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) that the House suspend the
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1129.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________