[Congressional Record Volume 153, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Senate]
[Page S1951]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BRAC
Mr. DORGAN. Madam President, I wish to make a point. My colleague
from Oklahoma was talking about the BRAC funding. I think everybody
here supports the BRAC funding. I certainly do. It is not a part of
this agreement, but it is not, as the Senator from Oklahoma suggested,
the Democrats' fault.
Just so people understand, we inherited a heck of a mess. We
inherited a huge mess. What was the mess? The fact is, last year, 10 of
the appropriations bills never got to the floor of the Senate. We never
got here. They never had any discussion on them. Had that happened, we
would have had those appropriations bills passed and signed into law,
and we wouldn't be discussing these issues.
As a result of inheriting an unbelievable mess, we had to put
together something between the House and the Senate. Let me make this
point: That which was done between the House and the Senate included
discussions with Republicans and Democrats on every single
subcommittee. We engaged the staff of the Republicans and the Democrats
as this was put together.
I wanted to make that point. We inherited a mess. We have tried to
make the most of it.
This BRAC issue is going to get resolved. I support resolving it. The
President is going to ask us for, apparently, $100 billion in the
coming couple of weeks.
Mr. INHOFE. Will the Senator yield?
Mr. DORGAN. Let me finish my thought.
He is going to ask for $150 billion above that next year with respect
to Iraq and Afghanistan.
The point I am making is this: I understand that not just the Senator
from Oklahoma but any number of Senators might come and say: I wish
this had been in it, I wish that had been in it. I personally wish a
number of items had happened that didn't happen in this continuing
resolution. But I was involved in working on it as chairman of the
Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee. Last year, I was ranking
member of the Appropriations Interior Subcommittee. That bill didn't
get to the floor of the Senate. The Energy and water bill didn't get to
the floor of the Senate. The bill that would have carried the BRAC
funding didn't get to the floor of the Senate. Why not? Don't blame
that on Democrats. We didn't control this Chamber last year.
But I don't come to blame one side or the other. I only come to say
we have tried to make the best of a bad situation. We were left with
quite a mess. How did we make the best of this? We worked with the
House and the Senate--bicameral; we worked with the staff of the
Republicans and the staff of the Democrats, bipartisan--to try to see
if we could put together something that would allow us to put the
fiscal year 2007 appropriations bills behind us and move ahead, because
we need to move immediately now to begin to put together the fiscal
year 2008 appropriations bills. We need to do that now.
So I only make the point that that is why we are here. No one likes
it. We have done the best we could to make the best out of a bad
situation.
Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, will the Senator yield for a very
friendly question?
Mr. DORGAN. I will be happy to yield.
Mr. INHOFE. We had authorized $5.7 billion to be spent this year on
the BRAC process and $4.1 billion was taken out, with $1 billion put
back. My question to you is: Can we have that made up without taking it
out of a supplemental that would be pulling it out of other wartime
activities? I would say that probably would work. That is my concern.
Mr. DORGAN. Madam President, reclaiming my time, it is not going to
be taken out of other funding in a supplemental. It will be added to a
supplemental, I presume. The President has proposed sending us $250
billion in emergency funding in two tranches, the first for this fiscal
year and the second for the next fiscal year. My assumption is that
everyone here believes those BRAC funds need to be dealt with and will
be dealt with in a supplemental, not by taking it away from other
military expenditures.
Madam President, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. All time has expired.
The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the nomination
of Nora Barry Fischer, of Pennsylvania, to be United States District
Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Mr. DORGAN. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Delaware (Mr. Biden),
the Senator from Hawaii (Mr. Inouye), and the Senator from South Dakota
(Mr. Johnson) are necessarily absent.
Mr. LOTT. The following Senator was necessarily absent: the Senator
from Wyoming (Mr. Thomas).
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Obama). Are there any other Senators in
the Chamber desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 96, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 47 Ex.]
YEAS--96
Akaka
Alexander
Allard
Baucus
Bayh
Bennett
Bingaman
Bond
Boxer
Brown
Brownback
Bunning
Burr
Byrd
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Chambliss
Clinton
Coburn
Cochran
Coleman
Collins
Conrad
Corker
Cornyn
Craig
Crapo
DeMint
Dodd
Dole
Domenici
Dorgan
Durbin
Ensign
Enzi
Feingold
Feinstein
Graham
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Harkin
Hatch
Hutchison
Inhofe
Isakson
Kennedy
Kerry
Klobuchar
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Leahy
Levin
Lieberman
Lincoln
Lott
Lugar
Martinez
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Menendez
Mikulski
Murkowski
Murray
Nelson (FL)
Nelson (NE)
Obama
Pryor
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rockefeller
Salazar
Sanders
Schumer
Sessions
Shelby
Smith
Snowe
Specter
Stabenow
Stevens
Sununu
Tester
Thune
Vitter
Voinovich
Warner
Webb
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--4
Biden
Inouye
Johnson
Thomas
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to
reconsider is considered made and laid on the table.
The President will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
Mr. CASEY. Mr. President, I was pleased that today a fellow
Pennsylvanian, Nora Barry Fischer, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate to
serve on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania. I was also happy to help expedite her nomination before
the Judiciary Committee to help ensure a speedy consideration by the
full Senate.
Ms. Fischer is a native of Homestead, PA, and a graduate of Notre
Dame Law School. In private practice, she has gained extensive
experience in litigation and mediation. Ms. Fischer will bring a wealth
of knowledge to the bench, and I am confident that she will serve
western Pennsylvania and the Nation well.
____________________