[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 75 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1138]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JIM GIBBONS

                               of nevada

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, June 13, 2006

  Mr. GIBBONS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to explain how I would have 
voted on several votes during the weeks of June 5th and June 12th 
during the second session of the 109th Congress. I was not able to be 
in Washington to cast these votes, as I remained in my district to 
attend my son's high school graduation.
  On rollcall vote No. 223, on agreeing to the King of Iowa amendment, 
I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 224, on agreeing to the Kingston amendment, I 
would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 225, on the motion to Table the Appeal of the 
Ruling of the Chair, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 226, on passage of H.R. 5441, the Department of 
Homeland Security Appropriations Act for FY 2007, I would have voted 
``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 227, on Ordering the Previous Question, I would 
have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 228, on agreeing to H. Res. 842, I would have 
voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 229, on passage of H.R. 5521, I would have voted 
``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 230, on motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
S. 193, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 231, on motion to Recommit with Instructions 
H.R. 5254, I would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 232, on passage of H.R. 5254, I would have voted 
``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 233, on motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
H.R. 5449, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 234, on motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
S. 2803, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 235, on consideration of H. Res. 850, I would 
have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 236, on agreeing to the Obey amendment, I would 
have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 237, on agreeing to H. Res. 850, I would have 
voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 238, on agreeing to the Smith of Texas 
amendment, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 239, on agreeing to the Markey amendment, I 
would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 240, on motion to Recommit with Instructions, I 
would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 241, on passage of H.R. 5252, I would have voted 
``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 242, on agreeing to the McGovern No. 7 
amendment, I would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 243, on agreeing to the McGovern No. 8 
amendment, I would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 244, on agreeing to the Weiner amendment, I 
would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 245, on agreeing to the King of Iowa amendment, 
I would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 246, on agreeing to the Kucinich amendment, I 
would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 247, on agreeing to the Sanders amendment, I 
would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 248, on agreeing to the Hefley of Colorado 
amendment, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 249, on agreeing to the Blumenauer of Oregon 
amendment, I would have voted ``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 250, on passage of H.R. 5522, I would have voted 
``no.''
  On rollcall vote No. 251, on Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
H. Res. 794, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 252, on Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
H. Res. 804, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 253, on Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
H. Res. 608, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 254, on Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree to 
H. Con. Res. 338, I would have voted ``yes.''
  On rollcall vote No. 255, on ordering the previous question on H. 
Res. 857, I would have voted ``yes.''

                          ____________________