[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 52 (Thursday, May 4, 2006)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4042-S4044]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                        MEDICAL LIABILITY REFORM

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I come to the floor to add a few words to 
the eloquent words spoken by the Senator from North Carolina about a 
national crisis in access to good quality health care.
  Some have said we do not so much have a health care system in America 
today as a sick care system. We know there is a lot we can do to change 
that and improve that. But we, at bottom, need to make sure everyone in 
this country has access to good quality health care.
  One of the ways we do that is by making it less onerous for health 
care providers--doctors and hospital workers--to practice their chosen 
profession. But right now--because of soaring costs of medical 
liability insurance, because of our unpredictable, some might say, 
litigation lottery system in this country--we need to come up with some 
practical ways to solve that problem, to help bring down those costs, 
to make it possible for doctors and health care providers to practice 
their profession. In the end, that is the only way we are going to be 
able to follow through on this promise of universal access to good 
quality health care in this country.
  Now, we, fortunately--as Louis Brandeis described the States, he 
called them laboratories of democracy. And we know, as Americans, not 
all good ideas come from Washington, DC. Indeed, an awful lot of bad 
ideas come out of Washington, DC. What we need to do is to look for 
good models and good examples of success stories and to try to emulate 
those on a national basis.
  Now, three times in the 108th Congress we brought to the floor 
legislation designed to modestly limit runaway damages--not for 
economic damages; that is, lost wages, medical bills, and the like--
but, rather, to provide some reasonable caps on what are called 
noneconomic damages, things such as pain and suffering, punitive damage 
awards, and the like.
  Three times we brought proposals to this floor to provide modest 
caps, to try to emulate the success stories in States across this 
Nation, to try to lower health care costs and increase access to health 
care, but we were denied an opportunity to have an up-or-down vote on 
those reforms.
  We brought forward a bill limited to obstetricians and gynecologists 
because of the lack of doctors to deliver babies for pregnant women. We 
were told no. We then brought forward a bill limited to emergency room 
physicians, again, to try to deal with the crisis and the lack of 
access to well-trained emergency room physicians. Again, we were told 
no by the other side of the aisle.
  But I have learned one thing in the short time I have been in the 
U.S. Congress; and that is, perseverance pays off. So if at first you 
do not succeed, try, try again, because, hopefully--hopefully--
circumstances will have changed, people will reconsider. Hopefully, 
constituents, whom Members of the Senate represent, are talking to

[[Page S4043]]

their Senators and saying: We need reform. We need change. And so here 
we are again to make another try.
  Just 2\1/2\ years ago, the voters in my State, the voters in Texas, 
passed proposition 12, a referendum that paved the way for medical 
liability reform and helped to stem the tide of frivolous and expensive 
litigation that had for so long plagued our civil justice system.
  The result: Decreased costs and increased numbers of physicians. And 
with it, better access to good quality health care for the people of my 
State.
  Consider the following: All major physician liability carriers in 
Texas have cut their rates since the passage of the reforms, most by 
double digits. Texas physicians have seen their liability rates cut, on 
average, 13.5 percent. Roughly half of Texas doctors have seen their 
rates slashed a quarter, producing roughly $49 million in annualized 
premium savings for Texas physicians.
  Let me make clear, this is not just about saving doctors money. That 
is not what this is about. This is about patient access because when 
the costs of doing business go so high, doctors who have practiced a 
long time, who are nearing retirement, say: Do you know what. I think I 
am going to retire early. Or when young, smart men and women are 
deciding what careers to pursue--if they look at a career where the 
overhead costs of practicing their chosen profession are so high that 
the rate of return on this investment they have made will be so low--
they will decide to do something else.
  That is why we have had a lack of access to health care in my State 
and in this country and why this issue of liability insurance rates 
coming down is so important to the ultimate goal of increased access to 
good quality health care.
  In my State, since the reforms were passed, five carriers have 
announced double-digit rate cuts, and recently Medical Protective, a 
company that writes medical liability insurance coverage, announced a 
13-percent rate cut in February--their third announced rate cut within 
a span of 11 months.
  The largest underwriter, Texas Medical Liability Trust, has cut 
premiums almost 21 percent, resulting in $86 million in savings, plus a 
$10 million dividend for its policyholders.
  Competition is also increasing. With the passage of these reforms, 
Texas has added three new regulated carriers, 20 unregulated carriers, 
and now Texas physicians can competitively shop for their medical 
liability insurance policies.
  But that is not the only good news. By far, the most encouraging 
results of these reforms has been a flood of new physicians coming to 
Texas. So there are more people to treat my constituents, the patients 
of Texas.
  Since proposition 12 passed, this medical liability reform, Texas has 
added somewhere in the order of between 3,000 and 4,000 new physicians. 
The Texas medical board is anticipating a record 4,000 applications for 
new physician licenses just this year, which is twice last year's 
total, and 30 percent more than the State's single greatest growth 
year.
  After a net loss of 14 obstetricians between the years 2001 and 2003, 
Texas has now seen a net gain of 146 obstetricians. Texas experienced a 
net loss of nine orthopedic surgeons from 2000 to 2003. Since these 
reforms were passed, the State has experienced a net gain of 127 
orthopedic surgeons. And those who need it most are the ones who are 
benefiting, as physicians move to jurisdictions where there has been a 
woeful lack of available health care.
  Sadly, in my State, the parts of the State that need access to health 
care the most are the ones that have been the least hospitable and, 
indeed, the most hostile to the health care providers because they have 
been the areas where medical liability lawsuits have run amok. This, in 
fact, has helped rein that in and bring some common sense to the 
system.

  For example, Cameron County, along the Texas-Mexico border, is 
experiencing the greatest ever increase in numbers of physicians. 
Jefferson County, which is Beaumont, Nueces County, which is Corpus 
Christi, and Victoria County, which is Victoria, saw a net loss of 
physicians in the 18 months before these reforms were passed, but 
currently all three counties are producing impressive gains, adding 
much needed specialists and emergency room physicians. As a result, the 
people of those areas have benefited enormously. Each of the medically 
underserved communities of Corpus Christi and Beaumont now has a 
neurosurgeon that they did not have before the passage of the reforms.
  Sometimes lost in the numbers are the real benefits that are 
realized, the day-to-day improvements in the lives of the people who 
are affected. After the passage of these reforms, two obstetricians in 
the small town of Fredericksburg, TX, announced their return with an 
advertisement in the local newspaper that said: ``We're Back.'' One of 
these obstetricians, a Dr. David Cantu, had been working for more than 
10 years with no claims, but he and his partner had to quit practicing 
their profession of obstetrics and gynecology because of the cost of 
insurance. Dr. Cantu's overhead was hitting 100 percent. In other 
words, everything he was earning was going to overhead, and he had a 3-
month stretch of time when he could not draw down any pay whatsoever.
  As soon as Dr. Cantu stopped delivering babies, the practice saw an 
immediate decrease in their insurance costs, but the patients were 
negatively impacted because they then had to travel miles away to have 
their babies delivered. This was doubly difficult for them considering 
that a full 70 percent of Dr. Cantu's patients were Medicaid patients 
and 40 percent were Spanish-speaking patients.
  With this reform, Dr. Cantu and his partner are now able to deliver 
babies once again. When asked why proposition 12 in Texas helped him, 
Dr. Cantu said:

       Because now I come out ahead instead of paying to be an 
     obstetrician. Prop. 12 made the practice of obstetrics 
     affordable.

  After 4 years of searching for a neurosurgeon in Corpus Christi, the 
community successfully recruited Dr. Matthew Alexander from a Wisconsin 
residency program. Dr. Alexander told the Corpus Christi Caller-Times 
he would not have come to Texas had the reforms not passed. As a 
result, patients are now getting procedures previously unavailable to 
them.
  Consider, for example, high school principal and triathlete Travis 
Longanecker, who was a recipient of an artificial disc in his back, the 
first procedure of its kind in south Texas. The surgery has alleviated 
his pain and allowed him to return to a normal life--again, a procedure 
that could not have previously been performed because Corpus Christi 
was having a difficult time recruiting a neurosurgeon to actually come 
practice there. Or consider George Rodriguez, who had a spinal abscess 
and arrived at the hospital paralyzed from the waist down. He had been 
in a paralyzed state for roughly 24 hours. Dr. Alexander again 
successfully performed the necessary procedure. But had the surgery 
been delayed for as little as 1 hour, George Rodriguez would have been 
paralyzed for life.
  These stories are not about theory. This is not about actuaries and 
about insurance policies and premiums. These stories are not the stuff 
of academic journals, and these stories at bottom boil down to basic 
issues of life and death and quality of life. These are real-life 
examples. These are real people whose lives are much better as a direct 
result of the relief provided after the people of Texas took to the 
polls, took action, and passed these reforms.
  While I am very proud of the reforms passed by Texas and the great 
strides we have been able to make in that State of 23 million people 
toward a better health care system, the fact is, we now have an 
opportunity to extend those benefits to all of the people in this 
country by passing nationwide legislation which would build on that 
Texas model and accomplish these reforms. I hope our colleagues who 
previously have blocked our ability to have an up-or-down vote on this 
important legislation will reconsider. The proof is as plain as the 
nose on your face. It is there for anyone and everyone to look at and 
to learn from. I hope those who have previously blocked our ability to 
address this important issue will have learned and will reconsider.
  Obviously, health care is so important to all of our families and all 
of our lives. I am pleased that we will also be bringing to the floor 
the Health Insurance Marketplace Modernization and Affordability Act of 
2005. That is a long title, but basically it is about giving

[[Page S4044]]

small businesses and other individuals an opportunity to pool together 
to try to make health insurance coverage more affordable and accessible 
so more people can have health insurance. We can use this to build on 
some of the great reforms we passed as recently as 2003 which allow 
people to create such things as health savings accounts, which has 
given rise to the whole notion of consumer-driven health care.
  Someone pointed out to me not too long ago that we know more about 
the used cars we buy than we do about the health care services we 
purchase because we can find out about quality, we can find out about 
price, and we can compare. The fact is, the American consumer is 
largely denied that opportunity, and we need to provide that sort of 
transparency so that patients can compare and make the best decision 
for their needs and their family, and which, not coincidentally, will 
help bring down the price of health care services because people will 
be able to then pay out of their health savings account. Obviously, 
that will have an impact on utilization rates as well.
  I thank the Chair for his patience and willingness to assume that 
position so I could say these few words both out of pride for my State 
and for the successful experiment we have conducted in Texas which has 
now served as a wonderful model for the United States going forward to 
try to address a true crisis. But not only a crisis, it is something 
that, once we address this and hopefully pass this medical liability 
legislation, Senator Enzi's health care bill which will provide greater 
access to health insurance and provide people with a better life, that 
we will ultimately have done something good that the American people 
can say: I know my Senator and my Congressman are up in Washington, and 
they are actually listening to what we are saying. They are actually 
dealing with the great issues that affect the quality of my life and my 
family's life, and that we will have done something of which we can be 
very proud.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________