[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 52 (Thursday, May 4, 2006)]
[House]
[Page H2159]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTRODUCTION OF H.R. 3499, RETURNING CONTROL OF PUBLIC EDUCATION TO THE
STATES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Culberson) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. CULBERSON. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to follow my good friend from
Utah and join with my colleagues from New Jersey and North Carolina
tonight to speak in support of Federal legislation to restore the
single most important part of our Constitution, the 10th amendment.
We all know from English class the beginning and the end of a
document are the most important, and why our Constitution begins with,
``We, the People,'' and why the Founders wrote at the very end of the
Constitution a declaration that they believed was as self-evident as
saying the sky is blue: That all power not specifically delegated to
the Federal Government in the Constitution was reserved to the People
and the States.
The 10th amendment has been forgotten largely, and all of us as
Republicans are committed to doing everything that we can to try to
preserve and protect the power of the States and individuals. The way I
often express it to my constituents is, I am a Republican because I
want to get the Federal Government out of our lives and free us from
the income tax, the most intrusive possible tax, to go to a national
consumption tax to restore local control over public education, which
is what we are here to talk about tonight, legislation that I filed
with my colleague from Utah (Mr. Bishop), with other colleagues here
tonight from New Jersey and North Carolina.
H.R. 3499 will return control over public education to the States
using a very simple concept that I can really actually best illustrate
by using these three glasses of water.
If you imagine that this first glass represents we the people and the
water within it all the rights, powers, and privileges given to us as
individuals directly from the hand of God, the way our constitutional
system works is that we the people, and I will use Texas as the
example. When we the people of Texas created the Republic of Texas, we
only agreed in the creation of the Republic of Texas in our
constitution to give the Republic of Texas maybe that much power and
reserve the rest to we the people.
When the Republic of Texas became a State at midnight December 29,
1845, and this is true of every other State in the Union, when Texas
joined the Union in 1845, the State of Texas only agreed to give the
Federal Government maybe about that much power. Very limited and
specific.
But as a result of the war between the States, the assassination of
Abraham Lincoln, the Radical Reconstruction Congress, the concentration
of power in Washington, Congressmen who love to pass bills that are
tough on crime and who want to protect the schools and the little
children, and FDR and the New Deal, and judges like William Wayne
Justice in Texas, who took over our prison system, all power today is
concentrated in Washington. There is really very little, if anything,
left in the States; and certainly we wonder how much individual freedom
we have left.
However, what Congress can take away by statute we can restore by
statute. And there is so much Federal law governing the way our public
schools work that these two books, Mr. Speaker, represent the two
public education titles, Title XX of the U.S. Code, and that is the
other half of Title XX. Those Federal statutes that send about $13
billion out to the States in Federal education grants are sent to the
States primarily through the education bureaucracies.
I, like Mr. Bishop, came to the State legislature. We would meet in
Texas every other year. And when we would return, we would discover
that the Texas Education Agency had signed us up for some new Federal
education grant program that we knew nothing about. But we now, as
State legislators, had the responsibility to pay for that program. And
often it was an underfunded or completely unfunded Federal mandate
which we then had to come up with new money, like Mr. Bishop mentioned
for the computer.
I have been looking for a way to design a Federal law that operated
automatically, like a computer virus, transferring authority over
public education over these Federal grant programs automatically back
to the States, transferring, and using the water glasses again, the
Federal glass, by statute, control back to the States over public
education automatically.
H.R. 3499 does that. It states very simply that all Federal education
grant programs, other than IDEA, the Individuals with Disability
Education Act, and Federal grants, for example, to Indian nations or
military bases, that all other Federal education grant programs, about
$13 billion worth, go away in your State unless the State legislature
passes a law and says, yes, we want the money with all the strings
attached and we surrender State sovereignty or State control over
public education to the extent that State law is inconsistent with
Federal law.
This would do several things: First of all, obviously, it would save
a lot of money, for the money that the States walk away from saying
that there are too many strings. But H.R. 3499 is in the Education
Committee, and I deeply appreciate the support of my colleagues in
helping to bring it to the floor for a vote to restore 10th amendment
control over our schools.
____________________