[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 45 (Monday, April 24, 2006)]
[Senate]
[Page S3431]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GASOLINE PRICES
Mr. INHOFE. Mr. President, there have been several speeches today--I
was not here, but I got a briefing--about the high gasoline prices, and
I want to clarify some of the comments raised by the minority leader
today and his Members in the press.
The minority is so eager to blame others for high gas prices they
seem to ignore the fact that they do not bother to consult the media
when they have a deadline. I am more interested in reducing high
gasoline prices for American families than to bluster the selfish
political advantage, unlike the minority.
I took the time to consider the nonpartisan experts of the Energy
Information Administration and what they had to say. According to the
EIA, there are three reasons leading to high gasoline prices. First,
the Nation has not fully recovered from hurricane damage. Twenty
percent of the domestic oil production and three refineries,
representing nearly 5 percent of refining capacity, remain offline.
However, offshore production is resuming and refineries are restarting.
The EIA points out that the industry delayed maintenance to maximize
production following the hurricanes. Today they must switch over to
summer blends.
Yet the focus is on the politics. The senior Senator from New York
charged the refiners are purposely withholding capacity from
traditionally operating at 90 percent to the current operation of 85
percent. In demanding an investigation, that Senator also implied that
the refiners should not maintain their facilities to ensure a safe work
environment for employees or they should not switch to special summer
blends.
One thing was clear. The senior Senator from New York did not bother
to consider the fact that nearly 5 percent of domestic refining
capacity is still offline due to hurricanes. Mr. President, 90 percent
minus 5 percent equals 85 percent, as the investigation found.
Second, companies are increasing inventories to hedge against
potential disruption in the future. Most of the time, the minority
would call such risk management responsible but not when they celebrate
the misfortune of the American people.
The third reason has to do with MTBE, and I won't get into that. I
will only say this. I am the chairman of a committee that is called the
Environment and Public Works Committee. It is our responsibility to
handle most of the problems. We are in an energy crisis. There is no
question about it. But for any Democrat to stand on the floor of this
Senate and try to point the finger at Republicans for high gasoline
prices is really absurd.
I have sat there and watched the votes take place. We are not able to
vote on ANWR in northern Alaska. Right down party lines, Republicans
are supporting it, the Alaskans are supporting it, the Democrats are
opposing it. We are not able to go offshore and take advantage of the
tremendous reserves that are there. It is right down party lines. Right
down party lines they stopped us from being able to have tax incentives
to go after marginal production.
I am from a State that has marginal production. There is a statistic
that if we had all the marginal production flowing today that has been
plugged in the last 10 years, it would be more than we are currently
importing from Saudi Arabia.
Lastly, in the area of nuclear energy, it goes right down party
lines.
I had a refinery bill that would have coupled with some of the closed
military bases and said cities can use EDA grants to go in there and
set up refineries and employ people and increase our refining capacity,
and it was blocked right down party lines.
So the Democrats are clearly responsible for these problems we have
in trying to increase the productivity, increase the production that is
potentially out there today.
With that, Mr. President, I yield the floor.
____________________