[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 43 (Thursday, April 6, 2006)]
[House]
[Page H1633]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IT IS TIME TO BEGIN SETTING PRIORITIES
Mr. CONAWAY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to claim the time
of the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton).
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Texas?
There was no objection.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Conaway) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. CONAWAY. Mr. Speaker, I have recently introduced H. Res. 690,
which would require this body to begin setting priorities. That is
something the Federal Government, and Congress in particular, do not do
a very good job at. In fact, we are really lousy at it, but it seems to
me if we are able to set priorities on new spending, then we ought to
be able to practice what H. Res. 690 would do which is require the
House that anytime we create a new program of any size or scope, that
we would have to, as part of that enacting legislation, eliminate an
existing program of the same size or spending.
We have tough choices to make, but we just do not make those choices
very well. You can look at the CBO's Web site. They publish a 50-year
study of what they think this Federal Government will look like in the
year 2050.
I have a grandson that will be about 53 years old at that point in
time. The government that he will inherit, left unchecked, left
unchanged, will be one that consumes 50 percent of the gross domestic
product in this country, and there has never been a free market, free
enterprise system anywhere where the central government could take half
and the rest of us passed on the other half. We prosper by having
growth in the standard of the living, opportunities and others kinds of
things.
So I believe that the growth in this Federal Government is the single
biggest threat that we face as a country to our particular way of life.
That sounds strange in a country at war, but the Taliban and al Qaeda
and the thugs that threaten this country can get a few of us, but they
cannot fundamentally change the way we live. They can hurt some of us
and they try, and we work real hard to not let that happen, but this
growth in this Federal Government I believe can in fact have a
fundamental negative impact on the way our children and grandchildren
will live.
I said I am a grandfather. I've got six wonderful grandkids and one
additional one on the way which will be born in November, if everything
goes well. Which grandfather or grandmother among us would gather up
their grandchildren, take them down to the nearest bank, and say, Mr.
Banker, I want to borrow every single dollar in your bank, I want these
six grandkids in my case, I want my six grandchildren to sign that
note. I am going to take the money and spend it, but you are going to
need to look to them to collect it. Well, there is not a grandparent
worth their salt that would do that on an individual basis, but somehow
collectively as a group we think that is okay because that is exactly
what we are doing as we continue to spend money that our children will
have to probably not pay back but will at least have to pay the debt
service on and that impacts their way of life in a negative way.
Every politician worth their salt will step before this microphone
and say we need to cut Federal spending. It rolls off your tongue very
easily. Both sides of the aisle say this on various occasions, but we
rarely practice what we preach.
I would like to point out tonight one program that I think would go
away and no one would even notice that it is gone. We have in this
country appropriated for 2006 money to provide an America's Job Bank.
This is an Internet-based listing of job openings nationwide. It is
maintained by good folks at the Department of Labor. Since this was
established, the Internet of course has grown exponentially and has
created such private enterprise-based sites as monster.com and
careerbuilder.com which provide thousands and thousands and thousands
of listings every day; and, in fact, this America's Job Bank is a
duplication.
Now the duplication only costs us $15 million, and that is a standard
politician phrase, ``only $15 million.'' Well, $15 million is a lot of
money for District 11 and is a program that I would include in those
that ought to go away.
As I mentioned, I have introduced H. Res. 690. We are working with
the Rules Committee to try to implement this rule for the 110th
Congress, and I would encourage my colleagues to support it. The reason
I am doing it is I have got six grandchildren and one more on the way,
and I cannot think of a better reason why we should not begin to do a
better job in setting priorities for spending at in this Congress.
____________________