[Congressional Record Volume 152, Number 30 (Thursday, March 9, 2006)]
[House]
[Pages H854-H858]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           THE OFFICIAL TRUTH SQUAD ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICA

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 4, 2005, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Poe) is recognized for 
60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
  Mr. POE. Mr. Speaker, the Official Truth Squad tonight is going to 
continue the theme that has already been addressed by three of our 
friends, Mr. Otter from Idaho, Mr. Bishop from Utah and Mr. Garrett 
from New Jersey. They have been talking about our history. They have 
been talking about the philosophy of America and who we are and what we 
are and what we stand for. So for the next few minutes we will be 
discussing our history, the American Revolution, the people who lived 
before us, what they thought, what they wrote, and what they said.
  I have with me tonight my friend from Texas, another freshman, Mr. 
Conaway from West Texas, and he is going to start out discussing our 
heritage and giving us some truth about who we are, what we are, and 
what we stand for.
  Mr. CONAWAY. Judge, I thank you. I appreciate the opportunity to 
share this hour with you tonight and to be able to discuss these very 
important topics with our colleagues in the House.
  One of the things that occurred to me while I have been here in 
Congress is that we don't do a real good job of delineating between the 
role of the Federal Government and everybody else. There is a great 
push every single day while we are here to expand the reach, to expand 
the scope, to expand the Federal Government's role in all of our lives. 
One of the reasons for that is I don't think we have a really good, 
clear appreciation for our founding documents.
  So I have introduced a bill, H. Res. 485, called the America Act, a 
modest effort to reinstitute the Constitution in America, which would 
require every Member of Congress, every Representative, every Senator, 
to read the Constitution once a year. It would also require our senior 
staffers to also read the Constitution, because an awful lot of what 
you and I do every single day is somewhat influenced by what our staff 
does; the idea being that you and I raise our hand in January of every 
odd-numbered year, one of the seminal moments of my short term here in 
this Congress in January of 2005 when we stood up to take our oath of 
office. We pledge to protect and defend the Constitution. In our role 
as lawmakers, we write laws to implement the Constitution, and, every 
once in a while, we attempt to change the Constitution.
  So it seems pretty self-evident to me we should know what is in the 
Constitution, and, given the reach of this Federal Government over the 
years, it seems we may have lost our way with respect to that.
  When the Constitution was being written 230-plus years ago, there was 
a constant struggle or tension, as has already been discussed on this 
floor tonight, of what the role of the Federal Government should and 
should not be. Those headed up by Alexander Hamilton thought a wide-
ranging, wide-reaching government would be appropriate. Others, such as 
Adams and Jefferson, thought a much more narrow interpretation of the 
Constitution would narrow the scope of this Federal Government.
  I doubt that if our Founding Fathers could join us today, that even 
the strongest proponents of the most expansive Federal Government would 
recognize what we have done under the Constitution with this Federal 
Government. It reaches into every single portion of our lives.
  You and I also, when we campaign and when we are talking on this 
Hill, talk about reducing the size of government, reducing Federal 
spending, the threat that the growth in spending has to our way of 
life.
  The real solution, in my mind, is going to lead to some hard 
decisions that sweep major programs, major perhaps Cabinet-level 
agencies, out of the Federal Government; a clear recognition that this 
Federal Government should be limited; that there should be certain 
things that are totally left up to the States. I am not going to name 
any of those tonight, because that is going to create some controversy 
when we begin to talk about that.
  The truth of the matter is if we are, in fact, going to rein in the 
growth of the Federal Government, we have to begin limiting the reach 
into particular areas that our Founding Fathers did not envision. So a 
modest step, a new effort to try to help each of us understand clearer 
what our role should be and what this Federal Government's role should 
be in our day-to-day lives, will be a reading of the Constitution.
  So I am going to begin asking each of my colleagues to cosponsor and 
join this effort to pass this resolution that would require all of us 
to read the Constitution once a year. It is going to be an honor 
system. We are honorable men and women in this body, and I think we can 
trust ourselves.
  I am a CPA by trade. You are an attorney. Our professions all require 
continuing professional education: doctors, lawyers, engineers, CPAs. 
CPAs in particular have to have 40 hours a year of continuing education 
just to stay current.
  It seems to me that politicians and folks serving this body should be 
as well informed about their job as anybody serving in a profession 
should be informed, and the start of that would be the Constitution, 
the base document on which this great hall is founded.
  So this requirement would require each of us to read that 
Constitution once a year, and record that in our records, and be 
available for constituents to ask us, now, when is the last time you 
read the Constitution, Mr. Congressman?
  I want to thank my good colleague from Texas, the great judge from 
the southeast part of the State. We are from the same State, but we are 
probably 600 miles apart in our homes. But it is a wonderful State to 
represent,

[[Page H855]]

and I am honored to have Ted Poe and the freshman group with me this 
year. I want to thank you for giving me this time to share this hour 
with you tonight.
  Mr. POE. Thank you, Mr. Conaway. You made several excellent points 
about our heritage. Reading the Constitution is certainly something 
that all Members of this body ought to do on a regular basis.
  I would hope all school teachers in this country would pick up this 
document, read it from time to time, and have their kids read this 
document. It is not very long. I have with me a pocket Constitution and 
Declaration of Independence that many of us in this House carry with us 
every day.
  Your comment about taking an oath to uphold the Constitution: Not 
only do Members of the United States House of Representatives raise 
their right hand and swear to uphold the United States Constitution, 
but every elected official in this country takes that same oath. 
Members of the Supreme Court take it, the President takes it, every 
State representative, State senator, the Governor of every State. Every 
peace officer takes that oath, every member of a city council, every 
school board, every person in public service in our country takes an 
oath to uphold the Constitution. It is the only oath that most of us 
take while we are serving in office. It certainly is an oath that we 
are obliged to follow.
  Several years ago the world was divided between free and unfree, and 
we had this Iron Curtain that existed in much of the world that 
separated those of us who are free and those that were not free. After 
the great wall came down, we heard many stories about those oppressed 
people who lived behind the Iron Curtain and what their life was like 
in that political slavery in which they found themselves.
  Several prisons throughout the Eastern Bloc of Europe housed 
political prisoners, one of which was a Czechoslovakian student who had 
been imprisoned and sentenced to 5 years for reading from a prohibited 
document in that Communist nation.
  What he did, he found himself on the steps of Prague University. He 
stood there, defiant, and quoted a document from history. It went 
something like this: ``We hold these truths to be self-evident, that 
all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with 
certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the 
Pursuit of Happiness.''
  For reading from that document, that Czechoslovakian student went to 
prison. Yes, that is a portion of the Declaration of Independence, our 
Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson.
  Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence justified to the world 
our independence from Great Britain. It gave the reasons why we had the 
divine right to leave that country.
  It starts out, ``When in the course of human Events, it becomes 
necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have 
connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of Earth, 
the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's 
God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires 
that they should declare the causes which impel them to the 
Separation.''
  That is how the Declaration of Independence starts. It gives the 
justification, the divine right, for an independent Nation, and, first 
and foremost, sets the parameters on where we get rights.
  As many in this body do, I from time to time talk to kids in schools, 
the younger the better; talk to them about America and our history, our 
glorious history. And I ask the question many times to students, where 
do you get your rights? And I hear all kinds of answers. ``My parents 
give me the rights.'' ``Teachers give me rights.'' ``The government 
gives me rights.'' More often than not, most of them say, I don't know 
where I get my rights.
  But the Declaration of Independence establishes to the world, first 
and foremost, where we receive those rights.
  So there is no misunderstanding, Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration 
of Independence wrote it down, that was later signed by 54 signers of 
the Declaration of Independence, that ``We hold these Truths to be 
self-evident.'' The truth. It is obvious. That is what that means. We 
hold these truths to be obvious. ``That all men are created equal, that 
they are endowed by,'' and notice what the word is, Mr. Speaker. It 
doesn't say government. It says ``their Creator, with certain 
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit 
of Happiness.''
  We live in a time where in our society we don't want to talk too much 
about the Almighty.

                              {time}  1730

  Or we may offend somebody. We may get sued. Our schools may get sued 
if they happen to mention God in the public school system.
  Well, they are going to have to mention the Creator if they are going 
to mention the Declaration of Independence, because the philosophy of 
who we are is that we receive our dignity not from government but from 
a creator, from a supernatural being.
  And the rights that we have come from the creator. Many times we hear 
about the right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but for 
some reason we seldom say where those rights come from.
  Mr. Speaker, this is a big deal. It is not a minor deal. Because, you 
see, government does not have any rights; only people have rights. 
Government has power. And it gets power from us, the people. We are 
higher than government. We are not lower than government.
  And this philosophy was new in 1776. Always before, the King was most 
powerful or the dictator was most powerful, or the military; Caesar was 
most powerful, not the people.
  And so when our forefathers got together and started talking about 
this concept of freedom and independence and America, they knew that 
the rights that they wanted to talk about did not come from the King; 
they did not come from a dictator; and they did not come from some 
military official. They came from the Creator.
  Because, you see, if they came from government, that means government 
can take them away. And the only way government gets its power is from 
us, the people. So the most important phrase in the Declaration of 
Independence establishes that the rights that we all claim to have come 
from a creator.
  It is interesting to note when Thomas Jefferson first penned the 
Declaration of Independence, his first draft, the three rights that he 
mentioned were life, liberty and property. But after it was debated, 
the issue was changed from property to pursuit of happiness.
  You know, it is important that we understand some basic principles 
about our past and who we are. Tonight, Mr. Conaway and several others 
have mentioned Alexander Hamilton. And Alexander Hamilton understood 
that principle that Jefferson wrote about, that our forefathers signed.
  And he said in 1775, a year before Jefferson's Declaration of 
Independence, that sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for 
among old parchment or musty records. They are written as with a 
sunbeam in the whole volume of human nature by the hand of the Divinity 
itself and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.
  One of our forefathers, once again speaking to the absolute truth, 
that rights that we have are because of a creator. And we have that 
right, those rights, because of the dignity and worth of the 
individuals, all of them because of that.
  Now, government seems to be very powerful nowadays, our Federal 
Government does. As Mr. Conaway mentioned, I doubt if our forefathers 
would believe the power of the Federal Government over the people.
  Now, whether we think it is a good idea or not, the power is 
tremendous. Now, think about the different things the Federal 
Government has gotten itself involved in since the Revolutionary War. 
For example, I will give you one minor example. Where in our 
Constitution do we give the Federal Government the authority to decide 
what every toilet bowl in the United States looks like and how much 
water runs through it?
  But yet the Federal Government has assumed that authority, that 
power. And you can go on and on and on talking about the role of 
government and the power of government. But I think all of us would 
agree the Federal Government today is more powerful than it ever has 
been.

[[Page H856]]

  And every time we give government power, I am talking about the 
people, because we give them that authority, because government does 
not have any rights, we take a little bit of liberty away from the rest 
of us every time government makes those decisions.
  And there is a difference between the government in control and 
having all authority, and the independent or the people having 
authority. I have used the example of the Iron Curtain and Communism. 
There are many Americans today who did not live during the time of what 
we call the Cold War or during the time and have watched what occurred 
behind the Iron Curtain.
  I had the opportunity back in 1987, almost 20 years ago now, to go to 
the Soviet Union and it was the Soviet Union at that time, a Communist 
nation that believed that the state was all powerful and all authority 
and rights went to the state.
  And the state doled those responsibilities and duties out to the 
people. But all citizens looked at the ``Almighty State.''
  And I spent some time there traveling different portions of the 
Soviet Union. Quite an experience. Different than being here in the 
land of the free and the home of the brave.
  But some examples of that. When I went to the Soviet Union, there was 
only just three of us that went over there. All of us were judges. And 
everywhere we went, we were followed. Usually by the KGB. We were 
followed two ways. Sometimes we were followed with the KGB agents right 
behind us. He or she wanted us to know that they are there. That was 
about half of the time.
  Other times we were followed, and we knew that we were being 
followed, but they were where we could not see them. But every place we 
went, we were followed by the government.
  We stayed in hotels in the Soviet Union. And the way it worked was 
you would give your passport to someone at the end of the hall, and 
they would give you a key to your room. When you left your room, you 
gave your key back to the person in charge, and they gave you your 
passport back.
  They would also give you a slip of paper that allowed you to get out 
of the hotel. You needed that piece of paper and your passport to get 
back into the hotel. If you did not have this government document, you 
never got back into the hotel.
  While we were gone, our hotel room was search every time. And those 
who searched our rooms wanted us to know that the room was searched. 
Our phones were bugged. We could tell, when we were listening to phone, 
that it was constantly bugged.
  And the people in the Soviet Union, you know, they are good people. 
But you could tell by the way they walked and carried on their daily 
lives they were oppressed. What were they oppressed with? The power of 
government in their personal and private lives, because government 
completely controlled everything, from where they worked, to their 
health care system, to where they lived, to whether they could even 
leave the city on a little vacation. Total government control of the 
individuals, because government had to assert the individual's worth 
and had taken it on as the power of the state.
  And we got to talk to a few Soviet citizens. They were very skeptical 
about talking to Americans. They would usually tell you directions, but 
they never wanted to talk much about life in the Soviet Union because, 
you see, there is a crime under the former Soviet regime that said it 
is a crime to engage in anti-Soviet activity.
  Now, that is a very broad statement. What is anti-Soviet activity? 
Well, it is anything that the government says it is: talking to the 
wrong person, taking a photograph of a particular building, writing 
something in a letter, trying to get on television to say something 
about the government. Any of those could be engaging in anti-Soviet 
activity and would cause this citizen to be arrested and tried by that 
oppressive government.
  After we left the Soviet Union, we flew out on a Soviet aircraft, 
Soviet commercial aircraft. There were not very many of us on the 
plane. We are all Westerners. As soon as the pilot comes on and 
announces in English that we are leaving the airspace of the Soviet 
Union and are now entering the airspace of Finland, everyone on the 
airplane immediately cheered.
  I mean, it was spontaneous cheering. And when we were getting off the 
airplane in Europe, I asked this flight attendant, I said, what did you 
think about all of us Westerners cheering when we got out of the Soviet 
Union? He said, it did not surprise me, because it happens every time 
we fly out of the Soviet Union.
  So the oppression in the Soviet Union was lifted because of the 
people in the Soviet Union and the people in the Free World. And that 
is why freedom is so important, because it is not just something 
Americans possess or want; it is something everybody wants. The people 
in the Soviet Union want freedom just like those people in Iraq want 
freedom, and Afghanistan, because it changes the worth of the 
individuals and puts the individuals most important and puts government 
below the individuals.
  And that is exactly the way it ought to be. You know, the 54 signers 
of the Declaration of Independence, some people have said when our 
country got together and started, those 54 people from all walks of 
life, many of them very wealthy in their own right, were the smartest 
and wisest people that ever existed as a group in American history to 
formulate these concepts of freedom.
  And the purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to establish 
the reasons why we had the right as a people to leave an oppressive 
government, Great Britain; and it was justified and outlined in the 
Declaration of Independence.
  After the Declaration of Independence was signed and the war with 
Great Britain was won, after several years, it was noted that freedom 
is always expensive, it costs the lives of other freedom fighters, 
because it is that important that life is put on the line for freedom. 
Success occurred. The Nation was free. But we did not have a basic rule 
of law to follow as a people. We started with the Articles of 
Confederation and basically the Articles of Confederation gave the 
Federal Government very limited authority.
  And so our Framers got together again at the Constitutional 
Convention and drafted the Constitution that we have now. There were 55 
delegates to the Constitutional Convention; 39 of them signed the 
Constitution. Several of them did not, one of whom was Patrick Henry, 
one of my heroes from Virginia: Give me liberty or give me death.
  He would not sign the Constitution. The reason he did not is because 
it did not ensure and protect individual liberty or what we now call 
the Bill of Rights. The average age was 42.
  A French diplomat that was here in the United States at the time made 
this comment about those people who got together to frame our 
government. He said that never before, even in Europe, had there been 
an assembly of more respectable people for talent, knowledge, 
disinterestedness and patriotism to a cause than these that are 
assembled here, talking about our forefathers who got together to frame 
this document called the United States Constitution.
  And before they started discussing this document, the Constitution, 
Benjamin Franklin, who was in his 80s at the time, said that if the 
Good Lord above is concerned about a sparrow that falls out of a tree, 
certainly he would be concerned about a new nation at its birth, and 
maybe we should ask for his guidance through prayer.
  And when he made that statement, those men at the Constitutional 
Convention got together and prayed before they wrote that document. 
That is one reason why in this House every morning we start with a 
prayer, needing Divine guidance and wisdom for the decisions we make.

                              {time}  1745

  And so when they set up this new concept it started out with the 
simple phrase in the Preamble that, ``We the People of the United 
States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, 
ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote 
the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves 
and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the 
United States of America.''
  So the Constitution starts out with the purpose of government and why 
we

[[Page H857]]

as a people get together and form government. Government's main duty is 
to protect us, protect us from domestic and foreign enemies.
  The Constitution established three branches of government. It 
established the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the 
judicial branch; and, if you read the Constitution, established it in 
that order.
  This is part of the legislative branch. We call this the people's 
House. The reason we call this the people's House is because to be in 
the United States Congress as a Representative, you have to be elected. 
You cannot be appointed to the United States Congress. Even on a 
vacancy, there has to be an election.
  So all Members of this House, all 435 of us are elected somewhere in 
these United States, each representing about, now, 651,000 citizens.
  Down the hallway we have the second house, the United States Senate, 
two Members from every State in the United States. And when the Senate 
was first designed, the Senate's purpose was to represent States, and 
the representation of each State was put with two Senators, U.S. 
Senators. At first the legislative bodies of each State determined who 
the Senators were. And later, by a constitutional amendment, that was 
changed so that the people of the whole State elected their Senators.
  So we have the people's House, we have the United States Senate down 
the hallway. And the reason we call that the Senate and this the 
people's House is because, even in the Senate, if there is a vacancy, 
there can be an appointment by the Governor until there is an election. 
And that was put as the basis for all democracy because we represent 
the will of the people of the United States of America in making our 
decisions.
  Down the street is the second branch of government, the President of 
the United States and the Vice President, the executive branch of 
government. The purpose of the legislative branch is to write the law, 
or, I call it, write the will of the people. That is what we are 
supposed to do. That is what we are supposed to do, write the will of 
the people, enact the law and the will of the people. The President's, 
the executive branch, is to carry out the will of the people.
  Unlike the House of Representatives, we are elected for 2 years, the 
Senate is elected for 6, the President is elected for 4 years. The 
second branch of government.
  The third branch of government is on the other side of this House. It 
is across the street here. It is called the Supreme Court of the United 
States, the judicial branch of government. Members of the judiciary are 
appointed for life, at least in our Federal systems. I was not 
appointed for life. I had to stand for elections as a judge in Texas, 
and many States elect their judges, but in the Federal system judges 
are appointed for life.
  So we have, in the middle, the legislative branch; down the street, 
we have the executive branch; and we have the judicial branch. And I 
think it is worthy to note that in the Constitution our forefathers 
envisioned that this body, Congress, should be the most powerful branch 
of government because we represent the people. The people put us here. 
And so that was their philosophy.
  The second most powerful branch of government was to be the executive 
to carry out the law, the President. The weakest branch of government 
was to be the judiciary because, you see, they are not elected. They 
are appointed for life. And they were to interpret law to the extent 
that if a law passed by Congress was passed, and it violated the 
Constitution, it was to be overturned, and Congress was supposed to 
write another law that would pass muster.
  It is interesting to note that that symbolism of Congress being the 
most powerful, legislative branch most powerful, the President being 
the second most powerful, and the judiciary being the weakest even 
occurs here in this House at the State of the Union message that just 
happened not too many weeks ago. And if you recall, Mr. Speaker, at the 
State of the Union message, at the top of the rostrum the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives was there along with the Vice President. 
The Vice President is the Speaker of the Senate.
  The legislative branch was at the top of the podium. The President 
spoke from the second podium below the legislative branch. When 
President Bush spoke, he was below the legislative branch. And it is 
interesting to note that the Supreme Court of the United States sits 
even lower, down here on the House floor. It is symbolic of the way 
that our forefathers meant for government to work.
  Even though that was the way they established our country and the 
Constitution, it is not that way anymore. I think few would argue that 
no longer is the legislative branch the most powerful branch of 
government. It is the weakest branch of government. The President is 
still the second most powerful branch of government, the executive 
branch. But the judiciary is now the most powerful branch of 
government; because, you see, in many cases the judiciary has taken 
over the role of not just the judiciary but the legislative branch. 
When they find a law they do not like, they do more than rule it 
unconstitutional; they move it a step further and legislate the way 
things, in their opinion, ought to be.
  I personally think that is a disservice to our Constitution. 
Hopefully those nine men and women down the street will understand that 
their role in government was to be people who interpret the 
Constitution and not pass law. That is one reason myself and Judge 
Gohmert resigned as judges. We want to make law and pass law rather 
than interpret the law.
  So in any event, that was the way our Constitution envisioned we were 
to work things and how this government we have is to function. The 
Constitution was inadequate because it did not provide for a protection 
of citizens of their basic rights. And we have even heard tonight some 
comments about the Bill of Rights, and it is really more than a Bill of 
Rights that we have. It is a bill of prohibitions against government.
  If you go through and read each of the amendments to the 
Constitution, especially the first 10 amendments, you will see that the 
amendment's purpose is to protect us from government. It does not 
bestow rights on government. It bestows more prohibitions on 
government, on how government is to treat the people. And I will just 
mention one of these basic rights or amendments tonight.
  The first amendment. It is first for a reason. It did not just happen 
to show up first. The people who put that first had an absolute 
commonsense reason for establishing the first amendment to be first 
because of what it says. That Congress shall make no law, it does not 
seem very difficult to understand that, Congress should make no law 
respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free 
exercise thereof.
  That is basically two rules that Congress, that is us, cannot 
violate. We cannot as a body establish a national religion. You see, 
the Church of England was a national religion and our forefathers, one 
of the reasons they came over here was because of religious persecution 
in Europe, England, and other places. And they did not want to uphold 
the national religion, and to prevent that from happening here in the 
United States, Congress was prevented from establishing a national 
religion.
  You notice it says ``religion.'' It does not say ``prohibition about 
the Almighty.'' It says ``establishing religion.'' And also Congress 
cannot make any laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
  Now, the first amendment and the first phrase was first for a reason: 
because our forefathers wanted to practice religion and religious 
freedom, and they wanted government to stay out of the way of both of 
those.
  Now, I wonder whether or not we are balancing these two prohibitions. 
Is government allowing in our country the free exercise of religion or 
not? And it all comes to the interpretation of this very simple phrase. 
The second right and prohibition by government is Congress shall make 
no law respecting the establishment of religion, prohibiting the free 
exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech.
  The freedom of speech was second in the Bill of Rights. Or freedom of 
press.
  And you notice it does not say ``fair press.'' It just says a ``free 
press.'' That is what we are guaranteed. The right to have a free 
press, not necessarily fair, because fair is always in the eyes of the

[[Page H858]]

reader. In any event, the rights of freedom of speech and press were 
next, and then the right of us, the people, to peaceably assemble and 
petition the government for redress.
  You see, these rights are first because if you do not have these, the 
rest of them in the Bill of Rights do not mean anything. And when this 
speech phrase was put here, it was put here because there were two 
types of speech our forefathers wanted to protect: religious speech and 
political speech. You see, that is the controversy. You could not say 
what you wanted to say about the king. You might get in trouble. And so 
political speech is protected. Religious speech is protected. And that 
is why you have the right of freedom of speech and, of course, the 
right of press. And a free press protects the rights in this amendment 
and all the others as well. And, of course, the right of the people to 
assemble and petition the government.
  So as we progress in the next few weeks, we will talk more about our 
Constitution in detail, hopefully getting some interest in the American 
public, into reading this book. Most books like this have the 
Declaration of Independence in it and then the Constitution.
  The Declaration of Independence was the promise. The Constitution was 
the fulfillment of that promise. And it is a philosophy our forefathers 
had that we still are arguing and debating about tonight and debating 
in this House on a constant basis. It is the idea of freedom from 
government, or government controlling us. That is the choice we make 
every time we pass legislation.
  Every time we give government more authority, we are taking more 
authority and responsibility from us, the individual and the people, 
and willingly giving it to government. Maybe we should do that and 
maybe we should not. But freedom is something that is very valuable. It 
is, in fact, the most valuable thing that any of us as individuals have 
or will ever have. And that is why the Founders of our country believed 
and died and lost so much to be free from British rule.
  It is now a world we live in, where many countries are free, that 
raise the value and worth of the individual to its highest level and 
put government below the people. And in this country we must constantly 
be vigilant to protect the people from government, because it is 
government's responsibility to do our will, not our responsibility to 
do government's will. Our will is paramount to the government's. And 
the only way government gets authority is because we decide to give it 
authority over the rest of us.
  I want to thank you, Mr. Speaker, for allowing me to spend these few 
minutes talking about these great two documents, the Declaration of 
Independence, the Constitution of the United States. And as the weeks 
progress, we will talk more about these truths that are self-evident, 
that these two documents are who we are, what we are, what we stand 
for, and what we will continue to stand for.

                          ____________________