[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 167 (Wednesday, December 21, 2005)]
[Senate]
[Pages S14302-S14303]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IRAQ
Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, over the weekend the Senate passed my
resolution, S. Res. 338, to honor the first 2,152 troops who have died
in Iraq and Afghanistan by listing their names and hometowns in the
Congressional Record. They deserve this tribute for their valiant
support of their military obligations.
I appreciate the support of my colleagues on this measure. It is a
symbolic way for us to honor each of our fallen heroes individually.
But there is another way we can honor their memory. And that is to be
honest and truthful about the war in which they fought--Iraq.
The President has taken small steps toward candor on Iraq, but the
denial of reality is still apparent in his speeches.
To make matters worse, the President is still making insulting
insinuations about those who criticize his Iraq policy. In his Sunday
night address to the nation, President Bush said:
Some look at the challenges in Iraq and conclude that the
war is lost, and not worth another dime or another day.
Does this statement suggest that those who disagree with the
President would not even spend a trivial amount to protect America's
international interests?
The President states that the sacrifices in Iraq are made in dimes
and days. But what about lives?
What about the more than two American lives given each day so far
this year in Iraq? The President didn't mention that.
I have gone to many memorial services and funerals for brave, young
Americans from New Jersey who died in Iraq. Seventy-three soldiers with
ties to New Jersey have died in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I have also visited Walter Reed Army Hospital here in Washington
several times, and I have been struck by the incredible resilience and
dedication to country of those young Americans.
While these brave men and women put their lives on the line, this
administration bypasses reality.
Today we know that Iraq did not pose an imminent threat to our
national security. We know that there were not weapons of mass
destruction. We also learned that Iraq had nothinq to do with 9/11 and
actually had an adversarial relationship with al-Qaida.
There is no doubt Saddam Hussein was a maniacal dictator who killed,
tortured, and suppressed his own people.
But President Bush did not call for an invasion of Iraq based on
Saddam's treatment of his own people. President Bush called for war
with Iraq because he argued that Saddam was a direct threat to the
American people.
That turned out to be untrue, plain and simple.
Now, in the wake of the administration's mishandling of this war,
much of Iraq has turned into a magnet for terrorists and extremists.
President Bush continues to say that Iraq is a ``central
[[Page S14303]]
front of the war on terror.'' But the reality is that Iraq has become a
terrorist front as a result of President Bush's mistakes.
Our 160,000 troops in Iraq have become a tarqet for cowardly
insurgents who attack us with roadside bombs and suicide attacks.
This is not progress.
Despite claims by supporters of the President's Iraq policy we are
not making sufficient progress in Iraq. Unfortunately, we may be
sinking deeper into a quaqmire.
We have not made progress because the President has never put
together a coherent plan for postinvasion Iraq.
For evidence of this, one need only look at the infamous speech
aboard the aircraft carrier on May 1, 2003, when President Bush
declared ``mission accomplished.''
``Mission accomplished'' sure sounded like the job was done and our
troops can begin to come home.
But we now know the mission was not accomplished on May 1, 2003.
More recently, over the past few weeks, President Bush has been
making speeches about Iraq in an attempt to reshape people's
perceptions of the war. The President knows that polls show that a
majority of the American people do not believe that the war is being
managed properly.
President Bush thinks if something is repeated often enough, people
will eventually believe it.
But the American people will not stand still while we lose more of
our courageous young men and women.
We all pray that Thursday's Iraqi elections will lead to a viable
government that will create stability. It could be a critical first
step.
But where are the plans if the elections do not lead to success? How
long until more lost lives exhaust the patience and will of the
American people?
In the meantime, supporters of the President point to evidence of
significant progress as more satellite dishes appear on Iraqi roofs and
cell phones are in Iraqi hands. But while the anxiety and fear existing
in thousands of American families continues, Iraqi satellite dishes and
cell phones do not suggest relief.
It seems possible to get an honest assessment from the administration
of any future plans to get our people home.
That probably explains why some of President Bush's statements on
Iraq have been contradicted by current military leaders.
For example, last June President Bush said there were 160,000 Iraqi
troops trained and ready to fight. But then, a few months later, Gen.
Georqe W. Casey, Jr.--the top U.S. commander in Iraq--said only one
Iraqi battalion was able to conduct operations independently of
American forces. That means less than a thousand Iraqi soldiers were
actually equipped to fight without our help.
And we should pay close attention to what the former head of U.S.
Central Command--retired Gen. Anthony Zinni--said about this Iraq
operation.
General Zinni has described the poor planning for the Iraq war as,
``at a minimum true dereliction, negligence and irresponsibility, at
worse, lying, incompetence and corruption.''
General Zinni went on to say, ``And to think that we are going to
`stay the course'--the course is headed over Niagra Falls.''
Other generals with vast experience voiced serious doubt to the White
House about Iraq, including Norman Schwarzkopf, Wesley Clark, Brent
Scowcroft and Eric Shinseki.
But the people who wear a suit--not a uniform--in the administration
didn't listen.
I served in the Army. I have met thousands of soldiers. I know that
it takes about 3 months to turn a young American into a trained and
dedicated soldier. So why has it taken almost 3 years to train a
handful of Iraqis to be able to fight for their country?
President Bush also said this war has made us safer. But Iraq is not
safe for our troops or the Iraqi people. We had 85 soldiers killed last
month--one of the deadliest months since the war began.
There have been over 70 suicide bombings in the last 2 months, an
average of more than one a day and more than 3,000 concealed bombs
either exploded or discovered.
President Bush points to last Thursday's parliamentary elections in
Iraq as a sign that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Let's hope
this is true.
But we have heard rosy predictions from this President before, yet
the insurgency seemed to only grow each time.
Remember: We also heard rosy predictions when the President said
``mission accomplished.'' We heard it when Saddam Hussein was captured.
We heard it a year ago after the first election in Iraq.
Meanwhile, 2,158 of our best young Americans have been killed. And
nearly 16,000 have been wounded--many with injuries that will forever
change their lives. No wonder a significant majority of the American
people do not believe that President Bush has a plan to end this war.
That is why it is time for the President to give the American people
a realistic plan for bringing our troops home.
What needs to happen? How many Iraqi troops need to be trained?
Let us set reliable goals for our mission, with an understanding of
what it will take to get the job done and brinq our troops back home to
their families.
Mr. President, we don't want our leader to deny us the hard facts of
war. And we don't want the price of this conflict hidden by prohibiting
photographs of the flag-draped coffins that carry heroes back to our
shores.
We need a leader who recognizes what a majority of the American
people see taking place in front of their eyes on television, in our
newspapers, in our homes, and in our hearts.
President Bush, I ask you to be frank with us about what we are
facing in the future in Iraq. Show us how you will work to avoid
further loss of life. And while we honor the memories of those who have
perished, we must do whatever we can to make life more bearable for
their families.
____________________