[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 155 (Tuesday, December 6, 2005)]
[House]
[Page H11078]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
U.S. DETAINEE POLICY IN IRAQ
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Meehan) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. MEEHAN. Well, Mr. Speaker, if so many of these Iraqis are ready
to come up and to provide the security, the police work in the country,
then surely there should be no problem with putting American forces
into the background instead of having them up front.
The reality is that we have missed a lot of opportunities in Iraq
because of a failed policy. Our own State Department polls say that 80
percent of Iraqis view the United States as an unpopular occupier. That
is right, an occupier. Forty-five percent of Iraqi citizens think it is
morally okay to attack American troops. So if, in fact, Iraqis are
ready to keep security in their own country, surely now is the time to
let them do that.
We should have had, as General Shinseki said, more security forces in
from the beginning. He said a few hundred thousand troops. And if we
had had them there, maybe we could have won the hearts and minds of the
Iraqi people from the beginning when Saddam Hussein fell. But the
Pentagon and the civilian leadership thought General Shinseki did not
know what he was talking about and they put him out to pasture. But the
truth is, he knew what he was talking about.
There have been other mistakes made. In April of last year, the
shocking photographic evidence of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib became
public. In an instant, America's new image in the war on terror was
published around the world with photos of Iraqi prisoners being
subjected to cruel, unusual, and degrading treatment.
{time} 2015
A report by Major General Antonio Taguba found ``numerous incidents
of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses,'' constituting
``systematic and illegal abuse of detainees'' at Abu Ghraib. And,
unfortunately, Abu Ghraib is only the most publicized case of torture
in Iraq.
Regrettably, it has become clear that torture of detainees in United
States custody is not limited to Abu Ghraib or even Iraq. Since Abu
Ghraib, there have been increasing reports of torture. Most recently,
The Washington Post broke a story of secret CIA detention centers
around the globe where prisoners were being sent for questioning.
Under the leadership of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, the
United States has given up the moral high ground that we used to occupy
as an international leader.
Last month, President Bush defended U.S. interrogation practices,
proclaiming, ``We do not torture.'' However, he has refused to back up
these words. Instead, he and his administration have vehemently opposed
a provision that would specifically prohibit the use of torture as
official U.S. protocol.
They supported legislation that would strip the right of detainees
being held by the United States to the writ of habeas corpus, an 800-
year-old legal procedure grounded in the Magna Carta. Instead of
denouncing torture is never acceptable, the administration seems to
continually be looking for exceptions to the rule.
In the now-infamous ``torture memo,'' along with other documents, the
Justice Department sought to carve out an increasingly narrow
definition of detention. Instead of firing administration officials,
like Alberto Gonzales, who referred to the Geneva Convention as
``quaint'' and ``obsolete,'' we have a President who promoted him to
the chief law enforcement officer of the United States of America,
Attorney General.
By accepting this behavior, the Bush administration has not only hurt
America's credibility around the world; but it has put our soldiers at
risk.
I have joined forces with a number of my colleagues to try to change
this course. However, the leadership in this body has kept us from
being heard. We have tried to obtain documents related to Federal
investigations of detainee abuse in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo; but
our efforts have been shut down by the majority in this body.
Mr. Speaker, 173 Members of this body have signed onto the Waxman
legislation to establish an independent commission to investigate these
abuses; but nearly 6 months after being introduced, this bill
languishes in committee without even a hearing from the majority.
President Bush and the majority did not want the independent 9/11
Commission. They have also opposed independent commissions to
investigate the Federal response to Hurricane Katrina. But just like
the revelations that came from the 9/11 Commission, an independent
investigation into our detainee policy would help us all in the end.
It is time to investigate these abuses. It is never too late to
regain our credibility around the world. I call on my colleagues to
stand up against torture by standing firm to the belief that the United
States has held for generations, that no individual in U.S. custody be
subject to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment, any
time, any place, anywhere.
____________________