[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 151 (Tuesday, November 15, 2005)]
[Senate]
[Pages S12811-S12812]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, with respect to H.R. 1815, the House-
passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal
year 2006, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services
be discharged from any further consideration of the bill; that the
Senate proceed to its immediate consideration; that all after the
enacting clause be stricken and the text of S. 1042, as amended, be
substituted in lieu thereof, and that the bill be advanced to third
reading and passed; that the Senate insist on its amendment to the bill
and request a conference with the House on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses, and the Chair be authorized to appoint conferees; that the
motion to reconsider the above-mentioned votes be laid upon the table;
and that the foregoing occur without intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? The Chair hears none, and
it is so ordered.
The bill (H.R. 1815), as amended, was read the third time and passed.
Mr. WARNER. I ask unanimous consent with respect to S. 1042, S. 1043,
S. 1044, and S. 1045, as just passed by the Senate, that if the Senate
receives a message with respect to any of these bills from the House of
Representatives, the Senate disagree with the House on its amendment or
amendments to the Senate-passed bill and agree to or request a
conference as appropriate with the House on the disagreeing votes of
the two Houses; that the Chair be authorized to appoint conferees, and
that the foregoing occur without intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. WARNER. Now, Mr. President, the Chair was about to announce the
conferees.
The PRESIDING OFFICER appointed Mr. Warner, Mr. McCain, Mr. Inhofe,
Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Ms. Collins, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Talent, Mr.
Chambliss, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Thune, Mr. Levin, Mr.
Kennedy, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Reed, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Nelson of
Florida, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Bayh, and Mrs. Clinton
as conferees on the part of the Senate.
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, time is short. We are about to go to our
respective caucuses, but I say to my colleagues that I wish to express
my profound appreciation first and foremost to my distinguished friend
and colleague of 27 years; we have been together in this Chamber,
working toward the passage of authorization bills in each and every one
of those 27 years. I thank my friend.
I thank the distinguished members of our staff, and I do use the word
``distinguished'': Charlie Abell, who left the Department of Defense at
our request to come over to be our chief of staff, replacing a very
fine person, Judy Ansley, who went on up to the National Security
Council, and our Democratic staff director, Rick DeBobes, who has been
with us many years. Together they have led a dedicated professional
staff, all of whom deserve credit and recognition in helping Members
reach agreements and to prepare all types of information needed by the
Members, and I may say to give good, sound advice. I have always
encouraged that of our staff. They are not just to be there to be
``yessayers'' or naysayers. They are to give us their best advice, and
that they do.
Accordingly, I ask unanimous consent that the names of both the
majority and minority staff be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Committee on Armed Services Staff
Charles S. Abell, Staff Director; Richard D. DeBobes,
Democratic Staff Director; June M. Borawski, Printing and
Documents Clerk; Leah C. Brewer, Nominations and Hearings
Clerk; William M. Caniano, Professional Staff Member;
Jonathan D. Clark, Minority Counsel; Fletcher L. Cork,
Receptionist; Christine E. Cowart, Administrative Assistant
to the Minority; Daniel J. Cox, Jr., Professional Staff
Member; Madelyn R. Creedon, Minority Counsel; Marie Fabrizio
Dickinson, Chief Clerk; Regina A. Dubey, Professional Staff
Member; Gabriella Eisen, Research Assistant; Evelyn N.
Farkas, Professional Staff Member; Richard W. Fieldhouse,
Professional Staff Member; Creighton Greene, Professional
Staff Member; William C. Greenwalt, Professional Staff
Member; Micah H. Harris, Staff Assistant; Bridget W. Higgins,
Research Assistant; Ambrose R. Hock, Professional Staff
Member; Gary. J. Howard, Systems Administrator; Gregory T.
Kiley, Professional Staff Member; Jessica L. Kingston, Staff
Assistant; Michael J. Kuiken, Professional Staff Member.
Gerald J. Leeling, Minority Counsel; Peter K. Levine,
Minority Counsel; Sandra E. Luff, Professional Staff Member;
Thomas L. MacKenzie, Professional Staff Member; Derek J.
Maurer, Professional Staff Member; Michael J. McCord,
Professional Staff Member; Elaine A. McCusker, Professional
Staff Member; William G. P. Monahan, Minority Counsel; David
M. Morriss, Counsel; Lucian L. Niemeyer, Professional Staff
Member; Stanley R. O'Connor, Jr., Professional Staff Member;
Cindy Pearson, Assistant Chief Clerk and Security Manager;
Paula J. Philbin, Professional Staff Member; Benjamin L.
Rubin, Staff Assistant; Lynn F. Rusten, Professional Staff
Member; Catherine E. Sendak, Special Assistant; Arun A.
Seraphin, Professional Staff Member; Jill L. Simodejka, Staff
Assistant; Robert M. Soofer, Professional Staff Member; Scott
W. Stucky, General Counsel; Kristine L. Svinicki,
Professional Staff Member; Diana G. Tabler, Professional
Staff Member; Richard F. Walsh, Counsel; Pendred K. Wilson,
Staff Assistant.
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, as we stand in this great Chamber, I
marvel at the work conducted by the Armed Services Committee since the
beginning of the 109th Congress. The committee has conducted 46
hearings and received numerous policy and operational briefings on the
President's budget request for 2006 and related defense issues. Since
the committee reported out this important legislation on May 12, the
Senate has debated many important provisions contained in this
legislation. Along the way, there have been many contentious issues to
resolve, such as detainee policy, missile defense, BRAC, and many
others.
After a total of 12 days of debate on the Senate floor, we have now
resolved them. I am proud we have achieved our goal of passing this
important bill. This marks the 46th year the Senate has passed a
national defense authorization bill. I thank particularly my ranking
member and my colleagues for their support.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Michigan.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, we would not be at this point in our
deliberations, we could not have arrived at this point on the road
without our chairman, Senator John Warner, who is not only a person who
is eminently fair--he is invariably that, fair--he is unflappable.
Despite his passion for the men and women of the military, he is
unflappable when it comes to getting things done in a very calm,
deliberative, and bipartisan manner. I am proud to serve in this Senate
for many reasons but not the least of them is being able to be a friend
and colleague of John Warner of Virginia, truly a gentleman.
Our staff, as he has pointed out, has made it possible for us to be
here as well. We function on a bipartisan basis. We obviously have
disagreements at times. We are always able to work those out in an
agreeable way or disagree in an agreeable way. We have been able to
bring the bill to the floor again with the help of our bipartisan
staff. We are glad Charlie Abell is back on our side of the Potomac
again where he belongs. Dick DeBobes, as the chairman pointed out,
leads our minority staff with distinction. I probably should not single
out any other member of our staff, but I want to mention Peter Levine
because of the unusual circumstance we found ourselves in where his
particular expertise made it possible for us to resolve this issue
relative to detainees. It is most needed and appreciated by all of us.
I think I can speak for both Senator Warner and myself when I say
that our staffs not only work together, as Senator Warner has
indicated, but make it possible for us to reach the point where we are.
I wanted to add my thanks, and now on to conference, which is always
fun. We have had more bumps on the road this year than I can remember
in any prior year for an authorization bill. We were on the floor, off
the floor, on the floor, off the floor for various reasons which we
don't need to recount. Hopefully, the road ahead of us will be smoother
and we can come out of conference, I guess now would be early in the
next year.
[[Page S12812]]
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, we won't make any predictions. We will get
started and do our best. I thank my good friend and look forward to
working with him again next year. We have truly formed a unique
partnership, the two of us together. I thank so many Senators who
recognize that he and I have a trusting partnership and resolved a lot
of problems that otherwise could prove contentious and maybe not had a
resolution. So to the next year.
I must say, I have consulted with the Senator from Michigan. Both of
us have great concern about the IED problem. We are going to have one
more hearing, in all probability a closed hearing, on this subject,
listening to some viewpoints in the private sector. We regularly meet
with those in the Department of Defense who have the primary
jurisdiction over this problem. This is one issue on which I am gravely
concerned and over which I lose sleep at night, as I am sure all of us
do, about the frightful weaponry the insurgents are employing and how
best we can put the entire country to work to resolve this problem.
I thank my good friend.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, if I may very briefly respond.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Michigan.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I commend our chairman for the initiative
which he has shown on the IED issue. We had a hearing a few weeks ago
on this issue which was one of the most fascinating and I think one of
the most important hearings our committee has held, at least that I can
remember, exclusively on the IED issue. It was under the chairman's
leadership that we did this. I think it was a significant hearing.
This committee has been absolutely dedicated to doing everything we
possibly can in addressing this threat. We have done everything we know
how to do, but we still have not solved the problem. As the chairman
mentioned, we are looking for additional technologies, additional ways
in which this problem can be addressed.
I did want to mention that hearing because I thought it was unusually
important.
Mr. WARNER. Mr. President, I thank my good friend; again, a
partnership effort to achieve that.
____________________