[Congressional Record Volume 151, Number 116 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[House]
[Pages H8063-H8064]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RECOGNIZING THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Schiff) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SCHIFF. Mr. Speaker, today, in the Committee on International
Relations a remarkable thing happened. Not one but two resolutions
recognizing the facts of the Armenian genocide passed out of the
committee with strong bipartisan support, indeed with the support of
both the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde), the chairman, and the
gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos), the ranking member.
One of those resolutions I introduced to recognize the first genocide
of the 20th century, the genocide which claimed the lives of 1.5
million Armenian men, women and children. The facts of that genocide
are clear. The facts of genocide are incontrovertible. They are bourne
out in thousands of pages of documents in our own archives. They are
bourne out in the words and the transmitted telegrams of our
Ambassador, Henry Morgenthau, at the time.
The only obstacle that the Congress has faced, and it has been a
formidable one, in recognizing the Armenian genocide is the resistance
of the Republic of Turkey, the well-documented efforts of its powerful
lobbyist, and the feeling of some that, by recognizing what all
historians have recognized, that we will somehow jeopardize our
relations with an ally.
{time} 1800
I have never taken issue with the fact that Turkey is an ally to the
United States. It is an ally. It is at a strategic crossroads. It is an
important member of NATO. At the same time, we cannot equivocate about
the murder of 1.5 million people; and the differences that we have had
with Turkey, and they have been considerable, over a whole host of
issues have not ruptured our relationship.
During the run-up to the Iraq war, many of my colleagues will
remember, we sought the permission of Turkey to allow American and
Coalition ground forces to enter Iraq through Turkey. The Turkish
Parliament voted on that, and they voted against it. That was of
enormous significance to this country.
As a result of that, we could not open that second northern front; as
a result of that, many melted away to the Iraqi population, many of the
insurgents that we now fight with so bitterly. That had enormous
consequences, but it did not end the relationship with the United
States, and recognition of the historic facts of the genocide will not
end the relationship with Ankara, either. There are strong mutual
interests at stake which will transcend the recognition of the historic
facts.
In the past, American leaders have recognized the genocide. Ronald
Reagan spoke eloquently of the facts of the genocide. Winston Churchill
in his memoirs documents the murder of hundreds of thousands of
Armenians in a crime at the time that was unequaled. Yet here we are,
fresh from recognizing, as indeed we should and as indeed we must, the
genocide going on in Darfur, but unwilling to recognize the murder of
1.5 million Armenians.
What does that say about American policy? Can our policy be that we
will recognize genocide when it is committed by the politically
impotent, as in the case of Sudan, but not in the case of the
politically powerful as in the case of the Ottoman Empire and its
Turkish successors? This certainly cannot be the policy of the United
States. We must recognize unequivocally that, beginning in 1915, 1.5
million people were murdered merely because of who they were as a
people, the very definition of genocide.
With the passage of these resolutions, with the support of the chair
and the ranking member, with the overwhelming support on both sides of
the aisle in committee, I hope that we can get a vote on the House
floor, something we have not had in more than a decade, so that we can
once again reestablish the moral authority and clarity
[[Page H8064]]
that comes with recognizing genocide, past or present, foe or friend,
alike. I urge the Members of this House to join in an effort to call
upon the leadership to hear the genocide resolution, and I hope the
leadership will heed that call.
____________________